In short, on what date will we know if there will, or won't be a hospital.
What determined, or determines that date?
Thanks,
Corey
Hospital timeframe question
Moderator: Jim O'Bryan
-
Corey Rossen
- Posts: 1663
- Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 12:09 pm
Hospital timeframe question
Corey Rossen
"I have neither aligned myself with SLH, nor BL." ~ Jim O'Bryan
"I am not neutral." ~Jim O'Bryan
"I am not here to stir up anything." ~Jim O'Bryan
"I have neither aligned myself with SLH, nor BL." ~ Jim O'Bryan
"I am not neutral." ~Jim O'Bryan
"I am not here to stir up anything." ~Jim O'Bryan
- Jim O'Bryan
- Posts: 14196
- Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 10:12 pm
- Location: Lakewood
- Contact:
Re: Hospital timeframe question
Corey
I would say we certainly should know between now and 2026.
Seriously, it depends on so many different things and different scenarios.
Things like the lawsuit are not even dependent on who is mayor or on council
as it is dealing with past history and actions.
There is the reading of the agreements and leases. Some say no control others read it as
control. Some say no ownership others say ownership.
Lawyers on all sides reading the same documents many ways.
As we both know this is why courts deal in "opinions" and "decisions."
People on all sides are still trying to figure out every aspect of this.
This is what I find amazing about so much of the controversy, and even more with the
facts as presented by both sides. What on earth are we building with or on? What on
earth are we saving??? It will be nice when there is actually a hint of the deal.
I have to believe that even if a deal was presented at the next council meeting, it could
take 3 months or more to move it through. Then there will be referendums on both sides
presented no matter what is decided or voted on. That could take it deep into 2016.
On the horizon a couple new offers are possible, and some more lawsuits based on what
has been discovered.
Your guess is as good as mine.
.
I would say we certainly should know between now and 2026.
Seriously, it depends on so many different things and different scenarios.
Things like the lawsuit are not even dependent on who is mayor or on council
as it is dealing with past history and actions.
There is the reading of the agreements and leases. Some say no control others read it as
control. Some say no ownership others say ownership.
Lawyers on all sides reading the same documents many ways.
As we both know this is why courts deal in "opinions" and "decisions."
People on all sides are still trying to figure out every aspect of this.
This is what I find amazing about so much of the controversy, and even more with the
facts as presented by both sides. What on earth are we building with or on? What on
earth are we saving??? It will be nice when there is actually a hint of the deal.
I have to believe that even if a deal was presented at the next council meeting, it could
take 3 months or more to move it through. Then there will be referendums on both sides
presented no matter what is decided or voted on. That could take it deep into 2016.
On the horizon a couple new offers are possible, and some more lawsuits based on what
has been discovered.
Your guess is as good as mine.
.
Jim O'Bryan
Lakewood Resident
"The very act of observing disturbs the system."
Werner Heisenberg
"If anything I've said seems useful to you, I'm glad.
If not, don't worry. Just forget about it."
His Holiness The Dalai Lama
Lakewood Resident
"The very act of observing disturbs the system."
Werner Heisenberg
"If anything I've said seems useful to you, I'm glad.
If not, don't worry. Just forget about it."
His Holiness The Dalai Lama
-
Corey Rossen
- Posts: 1663
- Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 12:09 pm
Re: Hospital timeframe question
Jim O'Bryan wrote:Corey
I would say we certainly should know between now and 2026.
Seriously, it depends on so many different things and different scenarios.
Things like the lawsuit are not even dependent on who is mayor or on council
as it is dealing with past history and actions.
There is the reading of the agreements and leases. Some say no control others read it as
control. Some say no ownership others say ownership.
Lawyers on all sides reading the same documents many ways.
As we both know this is why courts deal in "opinions" and "decisions."
People on all sides are still trying to figure out every aspect of this.
This is what I find amazing about so much of the controversy, and even more with the
facts as presented by both sides. What on earth are we building with or on? What on
earth are we saving??? It will be nice when there is actually a hint of the deal.
I have to believe that even if a deal was presented at the next council meeting, it could
take 3 months or more to move it through. Then there will be referendums on both sides
presented no matter what is decided or voted on. That could take it deep into 2016.
On the horizon a couple new offers are possible, and some more lawsuits based on what
has been discovered.
Your guess is as good as mine.
.
Thanks
Corey
Corey Rossen
"I have neither aligned myself with SLH, nor BL." ~ Jim O'Bryan
"I am not neutral." ~Jim O'Bryan
"I am not here to stir up anything." ~Jim O'Bryan
"I have neither aligned myself with SLH, nor BL." ~ Jim O'Bryan
"I am not neutral." ~Jim O'Bryan
"I am not here to stir up anything." ~Jim O'Bryan
-
Brian Essi
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: Thu May 07, 2015 11:46 am
Re: Hospital timeframe question
Corey,
It will be determined by the people and when the people decide.
Of course, CCF, LHA, Summers, Madigan and Bullock are racing to destroy the hospital in violation of law and against the will of the people before the people are given a chance to decide.
So, like Jim says it depends.
It will be determined by the people and when the people decide.
Of course, CCF, LHA, Summers, Madigan and Bullock are racing to destroy the hospital in violation of law and against the will of the people before the people are given a chance to decide.
So, like Jim says it depends.
David Anderson has no legitimate answers