Matthew John Markling wrote:Bill Call wrote:Each of those devices in Lakewood has an address. Shouldn't they be paying property taxes?
Have we all just be "Called" again?
And, just to play along, why would AT&T pay property taxes when City Hall just loves tax abatements?
Come on, Bill!
Bill
I am working on various tax rates that should b paid to Lakewood, based on the square
footage as measured.
Let's see, I figure, lose $50,000 with AT&T, $350,000 with our trees, $100,000 letting
private schools use Lakewood Rec stuff, and we are talking real money pretty soon.
Hell if the head of the Public Works Committee paid any attention to facts, he would have
seen almost $500,000 slip through the fingers of the people he was supposed to be
overseeing and that would have paid for backyard trash collection for 15 years!
I think it is a good "Call"
Some should revisit,
http://lakewoodobserver.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=2696&hilit=uverse
Where Lakewood City Council rolled over for AT&T violating contracts with others in a rush
to help one ex-Lakewoodite and ex-councilman whose education at Havard was basically
paid for by AT&T get this though Lakewood council.
Talk about grabbing one's ankles!
.