Ryan Salo wrote:dl meckes wrote:Not a very big area, but they have a bench.
I guess this depends on your definition of a "big area".
The distance from the side of the building to the edge of the curb in front of Sullivan's is 14 1/2 ft.
The distance from the edge of the building where 2 dad's is on Detroit to the edge of the curb is only 8 ft and the south side of the street only has 9 ft.
I am not trying to be a pain, but to suggest there is enough room for benches on most of Detroit is just not possible without creating other risks.
Maybe some of these active folks that want to walk but can't physically do it for long should consider a walker with a seat. Here is a Google search with quite a few options.
http://www.google.com/search?gcx=w&sour ... 80&bih=989
Maybe the facilities where they live could invest in a couple and everyone could share, I am sure they don't all go out at the same time.
Ryan
While much of this post make sense it does underline many of the real issues in this city.
Is there a plan and what is it. What is the city trying to be. I know that there is a vast
majority on council that sees Lakewood as a vibrant town for young people. I know that
there are others on council that respect and want to make sure those that have been here
both in Lakewood and on Earth the longest want to be taken care of. And so the issues
start. Hanging out at the Root or on Detroit, followed by no loitering signs. It plays out
in so many places. Kaufman Park and the neighbors, etc..
Since day one of it's existence it has always been a wonderful bedroom community for
both young and old, and all levels of middle class. So if the city is willing to spend money
grant or not on senior busing, then a skatepark seems like a fair trade. Bring hoops back
(have they put up the new hoops at Lakewood Park? ), and bike racks, then maybe more
benches for seniors and others who have been known to sit occasionally is a fair request.
BUT ARE WE A WALKABLE CITY? ARE WE A GREEN CITY? ARE WE TRYING T BE OR IS IT
JUST HYPE?
We continuously build building right on the sidewalk with very little green space. We are
missing choices to build back, giving us more space for green space, for benches, for
outside dining and living. Why? There was a slightly psychotic plan to build up DowntowN
closing Detroit Ave. and allowing for a ring road around the DowntowN area. Which would
finally give DowntowN the green space and gazebo a few have dreamed of since signing
on to the "MainStreet Program." It would also fulfill the fantasy of another small handful
of people to finally have a "mall" worth talking about!
Recently I read where a very green council person wanted to grow the areas of commerce
on Detroit and Madison while also respecting the residents in the neighborhoods. Just the
structure of the comment shows, COMMERCIAL FIRST, screw the bedroom community,
though we will try to respect them. I take this to mean, we will get cab fair home, and
maybe a call next time they run for office, for another date, to tell us how pretty our eyes are.
So what are we walkable? Bikeable? Liveable? For who? Those that have invested in this
community deserve and need to know. Do I live 10 houses off Detroit, or next to the new
ring-road bringing people to the Detroit Chow Line Food Court? If the middle of Lakewood
gives up its heart, soul and peace and quiet, what sacrifices are made to the north and
south? Common sense and millions of examples would show us it makes more sense to
develop along i-90. Or the entire city could cash in and enjoy the benefits of developing
the Gold Coast west, and along the lake and river. (Yes, I am talking of where I live) Why
are these areas never discussed or studied in development ideas? It would seem ideal,
working around a state route has massive limitations.
Yeah we still struggle with who and what we are and more importantly what we want to be.
I was reading report after report from other cities. They all mention "Their brand..." "What
we are looking for..." Just last week I sat through an Annual Report for Campus District, Inc.
where we have our newest paper. The discussion up to Lee Fischer's comments, was about
needing to define the brand, tell the story, finding like minded people that fit into the future
they have planned for the District. Addressing these topics were Lakewood's Ned Hill, Dean
of the Levin College of Urban Affairs, and Paul Velope of City Architecture, the group that
did our Detroit Avenue Streetscape.
If they feel that is important, then maybe we should to.
Ryan, Benches, placed throughout the city is not an evil idea, I think we can agree on that.
How many, who pays, what style, open for discussion, but for what we have given kids,
parents, we can kick the seniors a couple benches. Unless city hall no longer wants them
around, which many think. Then the city should tell them that.
Random thoughts.
.
