Shell, Saudi venture to build top U.S. refinery
Moderator: Jim O'Bryan
-
- Posts: 3281
- Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:36 pm
Shell, Saudi venture to build top U.S. refinery
This is good news for consumers.
Refinery News !!!!! (clicky)
LONDON (MarketWatch) -- Royal Dutch Shell and Saudi Aramco on Friday said they would go ahead with a $7 billion expansion of the Port Arthur, Tex. refinery that would create the largest U.S. refinery and one of the biggest worldwide.
Refinery News !!!!! (clicky)
LONDON (MarketWatch) -- Royal Dutch Shell and Saudi Aramco on Friday said they would go ahead with a $7 billion expansion of the Port Arthur, Tex. refinery that would create the largest U.S. refinery and one of the biggest worldwide.
-
- Posts: 946
- Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 7:11 am
- Location: Lakewood, Ohio
Re: Shell, Saudi venture to build top U.S. refinery
Stephen Eisel wrote:This is good news for consumers.
Refinery News !!!!! (clicky)
LONDON (MarketWatch) -- Royal Dutch Shell and Saudi Aramco on Friday said they would go ahead with a $7 billion expansion of the Port Arthur, Tex. refinery that would create the largest U.S. refinery and one of the biggest worldwide.
That is not good news. That is just more of the same old crap. Good news would be to spend 7 billion to bring cold fusion

-
- Posts: 3281
- Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:36 pm
Re: Shell, Saudi venture to build top U.S. refinery
Since it is the equivalent of building the first new refinery in the U.S. in more than 30 years. It is hardly the same old crap. This is good news for those of us who use gasoline. The flux capacitor is just a bit out of my price range.Jim DeVito wrote:Stephen Eisel wrote:This is good news for consumers.
Refinery News !!!!! (clicky)
LONDON (MarketWatch) -- Royal Dutch Shell and Saudi Aramco on Friday said they would go ahead with a $7 billion expansion of the Port Arthur, Tex. refinery that would create the largest U.S. refinery and one of the biggest worldwide.
That is not good news. That is just more of the same old crap. Good news would be to spend 7 billion to bring cold fusionto the masses.
-
- Posts: 1490
- Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 7:54 am
- Contact:
This is not good news, this is foolishness.
Now we go into business with saudis to rape our land of a quickly diminishing resource when that money would be much better being used for renewable energy sources.
Ridiculous.
Now we go into business with saudis to rape our land of a quickly diminishing resource when that money would be much better being used for renewable energy sources.
Ridiculous.
"When I dare to be powerful -- to use my strength in the service of my vision, then it becomes less and less important whether I am afraid." - Audre Lorde
-
- Posts: 3281
- Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:36 pm
-
- Posts: 3281
- Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:36 pm
Re: Shell, Saudi venture to build top U.S. refinery
Why would company invest $7 billion on cold fusion energy? Currently, how big is the cold fusion market (total revenue)? What potential percentage of the energy market could cold fusion capture in 10 years? What applications are currently working with the cold fusion technology (car engine, furnace, lights and etc)? How would a company like Shell justify this type of investment to its shareholders (long term and short term)? How would cold fusion work with a car and pwoering my house? Just curious...Jim DeVito wrote:Stephen Eisel wrote:This is good news for consumers.
Refinery News !!!!! (clicky)
LONDON (MarketWatch) -- Royal Dutch Shell and Saudi Aramco on Friday said they would go ahead with a $7 billion expansion of the Port Arthur, Tex. refinery that would create the largest U.S. refinery and one of the biggest worldwide.
That is not good news. That is just more of the same old crap. Good news would be to spend 7 billion to bring cold fusionto the masses.
-
- Posts: 1490
- Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 7:54 am
- Contact:
Wow - You are an egomaniac.
I am very well versed on the energy crisis, peak oil etc.
Actually, I don't have to tell you that, you obviously think you know everythig.
I am very well versed on the energy crisis, peak oil etc.
Actually, I don't have to tell you that, you obviously think you know everythig.
"When I dare to be powerful -- to use my strength in the service of my vision, then it becomes less and less important whether I am afraid." - Audre Lorde
-
- Posts: 3281
- Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:36 pm
-
- Posts: 1490
- Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 7:54 am
- Contact:
You don't seem to want to get this - a refinery to refine what? WE ARE RUNNING OUT OF OIL!!!!
We need to change the way we live and the way we consume and the way we continue to abuse the planet and purge her basic resources.
No, a new refinery is not good news. Oh and by the way, consider the damage already being done to the gulf because of offshore drilling.
No, not good news.
We need to change the way we live and the way we consume and the way we continue to abuse the planet and purge her basic resources.
No, a new refinery is not good news. Oh and by the way, consider the damage already being done to the gulf because of offshore drilling.
No, not good news.
"When I dare to be powerful -- to use my strength in the service of my vision, then it becomes less and less important whether I am afraid." - Audre Lorde
-
- Posts: 3281
- Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:36 pm
To refine 600,000 barrels of oil a day instead of 325,000..sharon kinsella wrote:You don't seem to want to get this - a refinery to refine what? WE ARE RUNNING OUT OF OIL!!!!
We need to change the way we live and the way we consume and the way we continue to abuse the planet and purge her basic resources.
No, a new refinery is not good news. Oh and by the way, consider the damage already being done to the gulf because of offshore drilling.
No, not good news.