Shell, Saudi venture to build top U.S. refinery

Open and general public discussions about things outside of Lakewood.

Moderator: Jim O'Bryan

Post Reply
Stephen Eisel
Posts: 3281
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:36 pm

Shell, Saudi venture to build top U.S. refinery

Post by Stephen Eisel »

This is good news for consumers.

Refinery News !!!!! (clicky)

LONDON (MarketWatch) -- Royal Dutch Shell and Saudi Aramco on Friday said they would go ahead with a $7 billion expansion of the Port Arthur, Tex. refinery that would create the largest U.S. refinery and one of the biggest worldwide.
Jim DeVito
Posts: 946
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 7:11 am
Location: Lakewood, Ohio

Re: Shell, Saudi venture to build top U.S. refinery

Post by Jim DeVito »

Stephen Eisel wrote:This is good news for consumers.

Refinery News !!!!! (clicky)

LONDON (MarketWatch) -- Royal Dutch Shell and Saudi Aramco on Friday said they would go ahead with a $7 billion expansion of the Port Arthur, Tex. refinery that would create the largest U.S. refinery and one of the biggest worldwide.


That is not good news. That is just more of the same old crap. Good news would be to spend 7 billion to bring cold fusion :idea: to the masses.
Stephen Eisel
Posts: 3281
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:36 pm

Re: Shell, Saudi venture to build top U.S. refinery

Post by Stephen Eisel »

Jim DeVito wrote:
Stephen Eisel wrote:This is good news for consumers.

Refinery News !!!!! (clicky)

LONDON (MarketWatch) -- Royal Dutch Shell and Saudi Aramco on Friday said they would go ahead with a $7 billion expansion of the Port Arthur, Tex. refinery that would create the largest U.S. refinery and one of the biggest worldwide.


That is not good news. That is just more of the same old crap. Good news would be to spend 7 billion to bring cold fusion :idea: to the masses.
Since it is the equivalent of building the first new refinery in the U.S. in more than 30 years. It is hardly the same old crap. This is good news for those of us who use gasoline. The flux capacitor is just a bit out of my price range.
sharon kinsella
Posts: 1490
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 7:54 am
Contact:

Post by sharon kinsella »

This is not good news, this is foolishness.

Now we go into business with saudis to rape our land of a quickly diminishing resource when that money would be much better being used for renewable energy sources.

Ridiculous.
"When I dare to be powerful -- to use my strength in the service of my vision, then it becomes less and less important whether I am afraid." - Audre Lorde
Stephen Eisel
Posts: 3281
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:36 pm

Post by Stephen Eisel »

sharon kinsella wrote:This is not good news, this is foolishness.

Now we go into business with saudis to rape our land of a quickly diminishing resource when that money would be much better being used for renewable energy sources.

Ridiculous.
Foolishness is posting something out of spite.
Stephen Eisel
Posts: 3281
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:36 pm

Re: Shell, Saudi venture to build top U.S. refinery

Post by Stephen Eisel »

Jim DeVito wrote:
Stephen Eisel wrote:This is good news for consumers.

Refinery News !!!!! (clicky)

LONDON (MarketWatch) -- Royal Dutch Shell and Saudi Aramco on Friday said they would go ahead with a $7 billion expansion of the Port Arthur, Tex. refinery that would create the largest U.S. refinery and one of the biggest worldwide.


That is not good news. That is just more of the same old crap. Good news would be to spend 7 billion to bring cold fusion :idea: to the masses.
Why would company invest $7 billion on cold fusion energy? Currently, how big is the cold fusion market (total revenue)? What potential percentage of the energy market could cold fusion capture in 10 years? What applications are currently working with the cold fusion technology (car engine, furnace, lights and etc)? How would a company like Shell justify this type of investment to its shareholders (long term and short term)? How would cold fusion work with a car and pwoering my house? Just curious...
sharon kinsella
Posts: 1490
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 7:54 am
Contact:

Post by sharon kinsella »

Wow - You are an egomaniac.

I am very well versed on the energy crisis, peak oil etc.

Actually, I don't have to tell you that, you obviously think you know everythig.
"When I dare to be powerful -- to use my strength in the service of my vision, then it becomes less and less important whether I am afraid." - Audre Lorde
Stephen Eisel
Posts: 3281
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:36 pm

Post by Stephen Eisel »

sharon kinsella wrote:Wow - You are an egomaniac.

I am very well versed on the energy crisis, peak oil etc.

Actually, I don't have to tell you that, you obviously think you know everythig.
The subject was about Shell and Aramco increasing refinery capacity in the US with a $7 billion investment.
sharon kinsella
Posts: 1490
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 7:54 am
Contact:

Post by sharon kinsella »

You don't seem to want to get this - a refinery to refine what? WE ARE RUNNING OUT OF OIL!!!!

We need to change the way we live and the way we consume and the way we continue to abuse the planet and purge her basic resources.

No, a new refinery is not good news. Oh and by the way, consider the damage already being done to the gulf because of offshore drilling.

No, not good news.
"When I dare to be powerful -- to use my strength in the service of my vision, then it becomes less and less important whether I am afraid." - Audre Lorde
Stephen Eisel
Posts: 3281
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:36 pm

Post by Stephen Eisel »

sharon kinsella wrote:You don't seem to want to get this - a refinery to refine what? WE ARE RUNNING OUT OF OIL!!!!

We need to change the way we live and the way we consume and the way we continue to abuse the planet and purge her basic resources.

No, a new refinery is not good news. Oh and by the way, consider the damage already being done to the gulf because of offshore drilling.

No, not good news.
To refine 600,000 barrels of oil a day instead of 325,000..
Post Reply