Redevelopment FAQ - DEBUNKED

The jumping off discussion area for the rest of the Deck. All things Lakewood.
Please check out our other sections. As we refile many discussions from the past into
their proper sections please check them out and offer suggestions.

Moderator: Jim O'Bryan

Mark Kindt
Posts: 2647
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2016 11:06 am

Redevelopment FAQ - DEBUNKED

Post by Mark Kindt »

My comments to the FAQ recently released by the City:
FAQ DEBUNKED - One-Lakewood-Place-Term-Sheet FAQ 1.jpg
FAQ DEBUNKED - One-Lakewood-Place-Term-Sheet FAQ 1.jpg (364.59 KiB) Viewed 5670 times
FAQ DEBUNKED - One-Lakewood-Place-Term-Sheet FAQ 2.jpg
FAQ DEBUNKED - One-Lakewood-Place-Term-Sheet FAQ 2.jpg (443.77 KiB) Viewed 5670 times
FAQ DEBUNKED - One-Lakewood-Place-Term-Sheet FAQ 3.jpg
FAQ DEBUNKED - One-Lakewood-Place-Term-Sheet FAQ 3.jpg (372.78 KiB) Viewed 5670 times
Bill Call
Posts: 3319
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 1:10 pm

Re: Redevelopment FAQ - DEBUNKED

Post by Bill Call »

Well.

If the City is an investor will the City be receiving a share of the profits?

What are the profits?

How much cash will Carnegie Development be investing in the project?

If this is such a great investment why does Carnegie Development need $6 million from Lakewood?
Nadhal Eadeh
Posts: 144
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 10:51 am

Re: Redevelopment FAQ - DEBUNKED

Post by Nadhal Eadeh »

If this is such a great investment why does Carnegie Development need $6 million from Lakewood?
A good point to highlight.
Mark Kindt
Posts: 2647
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2016 11:06 am

Re: Redevelopment FAQ - DEBUNKED

Post by Mark Kindt »

Debunking continued:
FAQ DEBUNKED - One-Lakewood-Place-Term-Sheet FAQ 4.jpg
FAQ DEBUNKED - One-Lakewood-Place-Term-Sheet FAQ 4.jpg (349.06 KiB) Viewed 5510 times
Mark Kindt
Posts: 2647
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2016 11:06 am

Re: Redevelopment FAQ - DEBUNKED

Post by Mark Kindt »

FAQ DEBUNKED - One-Lakewood-Place-Term-Sheet FAQ 5.jpg
FAQ DEBUNKED - One-Lakewood-Place-Term-Sheet FAQ 5.jpg (417.63 KiB) Viewed 5491 times
Mark Kindt
Posts: 2647
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2016 11:06 am

Re: Redevelopment FAQ - DEBUNKED

Post by Mark Kindt »

FAQ DEBUNKED - One-Lakewood-Place-Term-Sheet FAQ 6.jpg
FAQ DEBUNKED - One-Lakewood-Place-Term-Sheet FAQ 6.jpg (328.68 KiB) Viewed 5480 times
Mark Kindt
Posts: 2647
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2016 11:06 am

Re: Redevelopment FAQ - DEBUNKED

Post by Mark Kindt »

Debunkification

You may be curious as to why I am taking so much time to debunkify the One Lakewood Place FAQ document.

The answer is simple.

I am tired of being continually lied to by local elected and appointed officials in city government.

Now back to more debunkification:
FAQ DEBUNKED - One-Lakewood-Place-Term-Sheet FAQ 7.jpg
FAQ DEBUNKED - One-Lakewood-Place-Term-Sheet FAQ 7.jpg (447.45 KiB) Viewed 5430 times
Bill Call
Posts: 3319
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 1:10 pm

Re: Redevelopment FAQ - DEBUNKED

Post by Bill Call »

Excellent work.

The City spreadsheet ignores:

the $7 million + in demolition costs

and the ongoing charges to the City for the Clinics 'administrative costs"

Is anyone on Council demanding that the LHA and Clinic account for the depletion of the Hospital's cash and investment account?

City Council should not give this land away. The Mayor and his supporters promised that the City would be receiving $24 million in cash by 2018. It is 2018. Where is the money?
Mark Kindt
Posts: 2647
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2016 11:06 am

Re: Redevelopment FAQ - DEBUNKED

Post by Mark Kindt »

If you get your calculator out, you can confirm that the there is NO payback in four years.
Payback Years for City Investment in Project.jpg
Payback Years for City Investment in Project.jpg (159.06 KiB) Viewed 5267 times
Mark Kindt
Posts: 2647
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2016 11:06 am

Re: Redevelopment FAQ - DEBUNKED

Post by Mark Kindt »

Now for a little more debunkery:
FAQ DEBUNKED - One-Lakewood-Place-Term-Sheet FAQ Q13.jpg
FAQ DEBUNKED - One-Lakewood-Place-Term-Sheet FAQ Q13.jpg (406.5 KiB) Viewed 5267 times
Mark Kindt
Posts: 2647
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2016 11:06 am

Re: Redevelopment FAQ - DEBUNKED

Post by Mark Kindt »

Debunkification of FAQ No. 15:

FAQ DEBUNKED - One-Lakewood-Place-Term-Sheet FAQ Q15.jpg
FAQ DEBUNKED - One-Lakewood-Place-Term-Sheet FAQ Q15.jpg (408.37 KiB) Viewed 5208 times
Mark Kindt
Posts: 2647
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2016 11:06 am

Re: Redevelopment FAQ - DEBUNKED

Post by Mark Kindt »

Here are comments to FAQ 16 and FAQ 17:
FAQ DEBUNKED - One-Lakewood-Place-Term-Sheet FAQ Q16 Q17.jpg
FAQ DEBUNKED - One-Lakewood-Place-Term-Sheet FAQ Q16 Q17.jpg (406.66 KiB) Viewed 5207 times
Mark Kindt
Posts: 2647
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2016 11:06 am

Re: Redevelopment FAQ - DEBUNKED

Post by Mark Kindt »

FAQ No. 18 and No. 19 under debunkification:
FAQ DEBUNKED - One-Lakewood-Place-Term-Sheet FAQ Q18 Q19.jpg
FAQ DEBUNKED - One-Lakewood-Place-Term-Sheet FAQ Q18 Q19.jpg (418.13 KiB) Viewed 5161 times
Bridget Conant
Posts: 2896
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 4:22 pm

Re: Redevelopment FAQ - DEBUNKED

Post by Bridget Conant »

No traffic study ever done.

They’ll get to it at some point. Just an afterthought.

I recall the exact same issue with the West End. They claimed they had a study and a plan for the traffic so I went to city hall to get it and guess what?

There wasn’t one!

Just more talk and excuses with nothing behind it.
Mark Kindt
Posts: 2647
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2016 11:06 am

Re: Redevelopment FAQ - DEBUNKED

Post by Mark Kindt »

Note Correction:

"Our independent physician base was transformed into retirement."
Post Reply