Pae & Defendant O'Leary's Council Take $2.1M From Hospital Fund to Cover General Fund Shortfalls
Moderator: Jim O'Bryan
-
Brian Essi
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: Thu May 07, 2015 11:46 am
Pae & Defendant O'Leary's Council Take $2.1M From Hospital Fund to Cover General Fund Shortfalls
Here comes the consequences of Dreaming BIg....
ORDINANCE NO. 41 -16 -
$2.1M transferred out of the Lakewood Hospital Fund and into the General Fund
"In the event the General Fund needs fiscal year-end support"
What happens when they run out of the pennies they got from the sale of Lakewood Hospital?
Tax increases?
Hmmm
ORDINANCE NO. 41 -16 -
$2.1M transferred out of the Lakewood Hospital Fund and into the General Fund
"In the event the General Fund needs fiscal year-end support"
What happens when they run out of the pennies they got from the sale of Lakewood Hospital?
Tax increases?
Hmmm
David Anderson has no legitimate answers
-
Bill Call
- Posts: 3319
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 1:10 pm
Re: Pae & Defendant O'Leary's Council Take $2.1M From Hospital Fund to Cover General Fund Shortfalls
Brian Essi wrote:Here comes the consequences of Dreaming BIg....
ORDINANCE NO. 41 -16 -
$2.1M transferred out of the Lakewood Hospital Fund and into the General Fund
"In the event the General Fund needs fiscal year-end support"
What happens when they run out of the pennies they got from the sale of Lakewood Hospital?
Tax increases?
Hmmm
Selling City assets to fund operating expenses is never a good idea.
But, that's the plan.
- Jim O'Bryan
- Posts: 14196
- Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 10:12 pm
- Location: Lakewood
- Contact:
Re: Pae & Defendant O'Leary's Council Take $2.1M From Hospital Fund to Cover General Fund Shortfalls
Bill Call wrote:Brian Essi wrote:Here comes the consequences of Dreaming BIg....
ORDINANCE NO. 41 -16 -
$2.1M transferred out of the Lakewood Hospital Fund and into the General Fund
"In the event the General Fund needs fiscal year-end support"
What happens when they run out of the pennies they got from the sale of Lakewood Hospital?
Tax increases?
Hmmm
Selling City assets to fund operating expenses is never a good idea.
But, that's the plan.
Selling assets to handle bad management is even worse.
Let's not forget, the Mayor has spent over $2 million to get elected, "Solstice Steps" and another mill on crisis management because he would not tell the truth to the people that trusted him enough to elect him.
.
Jim O'Bryan
Lakewood Resident
"The very act of observing disturbs the system."
Werner Heisenberg
"If anything I've said seems useful to you, I'm glad.
If not, don't worry. Just forget about it."
His Holiness The Dalai Lama
Lakewood Resident
"The very act of observing disturbs the system."
Werner Heisenberg
"If anything I've said seems useful to you, I'm glad.
If not, don't worry. Just forget about it."
His Holiness The Dalai Lama
-
Bridget Conant
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 4:22 pm
Re: Pae & Defendant O'Leary's Council Take $2.1M From Hospital Fund to Cover General Fund Shortfalls
This doesn't look good.
So when Jenn Pae says the city can weather the loss of the million plus in income tax from the hospital employees, she lied?
So when Jenn Pae says the city can weather the loss of the million plus in income tax from the hospital employees, she lied?
-
cmager
- Posts: 697
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 8:33 am
-
Lori Allen _
- Posts: 2550
- Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2015 2:37 pm
Re: Pae & Defendant O'Leary's Council Take $2.1M From Hospital Fund to Cover General Fund Shortfalls
Come on, let's just relax. I hear the money was sent out to be laundered! But, who will pick it up? 
-
Dan Alaimo
- Posts: 2140
- Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 8:49 am
Re: Pae & Defendant O'Leary's Council Take $2.1M From Hospital Fund to Cover General Fund Shortfalls
Nice one, Bill.cmager wrote:You've been Pae'd.
“Never let a good crisis go to waste." - Winston Churchill (Quote later appropriated by Rahm Emanuel)
-
Meg Ostrowski
- Posts: 466
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 10:42 am
Re: Pae & Defendant O'Leary's Council Take $2.1M From Hospital Fund to Cover General Fund Shortfalls
It could just be a housekeeping measure. Now that the city has assured the permanent closure of Lakewood Hospital, perhaps there is no longer a need for the hospital fund? Although I do recall it being used to support EMS, which we'll now need more than ever.Brian Essi wrote:Here comes the consequences of Dreaming BIg....
ORDINANCE NO. 41 -16 -
$2.1M transferred out of the Lakewood Hospital Fund and into the General Fund
"In the event the General Fund needs fiscal year-end support"
What happens when they run out of the pennies they got from the sale of Lakewood Hospital?
Tax increases?
Hmmm
Like you, I am concerned about the long term consequences of this administration's "big dream." I would have preferred a more pragmatic approach to Lakewood's future.
“There could be anywhere from 1 to over 50,000 Lakewoods at any time. I’m good with any of those numbers, as long as it’s just not 2 Lakewoods.” -Stephen Davis
-
Brian Essi
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: Thu May 07, 2015 11:46 am
Re: Pae & Defendant O'Leary's Council Take $2.1M From Hospital Fund to Cover General Fund Shortfalls
This is not likely a housekeeping measure. Pae & the city audits booked all proceeds from "the sale of Lakewood Hospital to the Cleveland Clinic" as contributions to the Lakewood Hospital Fund (a city fund on the city's books that was set up years ago to handle rent received by the city from the hospital and the EMS squads.).Meg Ostrowski wrote:It could just be a housekeeping measure. Now that the city has assured the permanent closure of Lakewood Hospital, perhaps there is no longer a need for the hospital fund? Although I do recall it being used to support EMS, which we'll now need more than ever.Brian Essi wrote:Here comes the consequences of Dreaming BIg....
ORDINANCE NO. 41 -16 -
$2.1M transferred out of the Lakewood Hospital Fund and into the General Fund
"In the event the General Fund needs fiscal year-end support"
What happens when they run out of the pennies they got from the sale of Lakewood Hospital?
Tax increases?
Hmmm
Like you, I am concerned about the long term consequences of this administration's "big dream." I would have preferred a more pragmatic approach to Lakewood's future.
In the 2015 CAFR, the Hospital Fund increased roughly over $9.6M and $11M based upon cash and accrual methods, respectively.
So taking out such a round number like $2.1M from the greater sum of the fund seems to have a purpose. We are left with Pae's states purpose in the Ordinance unless the public record of the COW or Council Meeting shows otherwise. I was unable to attend the meetings and have not yet reviewed the entire record.
In the end, we are left with the written record and the lip service---which we all know may only be part of the story or a head fake by the public officials and the shadow "leaders" of the government.
David Anderson has no legitimate answers