Pae & Defendant O'Leary's Council Take $2.1M From Hospital Fund to Cover General Fund Shortfalls

The jumping off discussion area for the rest of the Deck. All things Lakewood.
Please check out our other sections. As we refile many discussions from the past into
their proper sections please check them out and offer suggestions.

Moderator: Jim O'Bryan

Brian Essi
Posts: 2421
Joined: Thu May 07, 2015 11:46 am

Pae & Defendant O'Leary's Council Take $2.1M From Hospital Fund to Cover General Fund Shortfalls

Post by Brian Essi »

Here comes the consequences of Dreaming BIg....

ORDINANCE NO. 41 -16 -

$2.1M transferred out of the Lakewood Hospital Fund and into the General Fund

"In the event the General Fund needs fiscal year-end support"

What happens when they run out of the pennies they got from the sale of Lakewood Hospital?

Tax increases?

Hmmm
David Anderson has no legitimate answers
Bill Call
Posts: 3319
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 1:10 pm

Re: Pae & Defendant O'Leary's Council Take $2.1M From Hospital Fund to Cover General Fund Shortfalls

Post by Bill Call »

Brian Essi wrote:Here comes the consequences of Dreaming BIg....

ORDINANCE NO. 41 -16 -

$2.1M transferred out of the Lakewood Hospital Fund and into the General Fund

"In the event the General Fund needs fiscal year-end support"

What happens when they run out of the pennies they got from the sale of Lakewood Hospital?

Tax increases?

Hmmm

Selling City assets to fund operating expenses is never a good idea.

But, that's the plan.
User avatar
Jim O'Bryan
Posts: 14196
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 10:12 pm
Location: Lakewood
Contact:

Re: Pae & Defendant O'Leary's Council Take $2.1M From Hospital Fund to Cover General Fund Shortfalls

Post by Jim O'Bryan »

Bill Call wrote:
Brian Essi wrote:Here comes the consequences of Dreaming BIg....

ORDINANCE NO. 41 -16 -

$2.1M transferred out of the Lakewood Hospital Fund and into the General Fund

"In the event the General Fund needs fiscal year-end support"

What happens when they run out of the pennies they got from the sale of Lakewood Hospital?

Tax increases?

Hmmm

Selling City assets to fund operating expenses is never a good idea.

But, that's the plan.


Selling assets to handle bad management is even worse.

Let's not forget, the Mayor has spent over $2 million to get elected, "Solstice Steps" and another mill on crisis management because he would not tell the truth to the people that trusted him enough to elect him.

.
Jim O'Bryan
Lakewood Resident

"The very act of observing disturbs the system."
Werner Heisenberg

"If anything I've said seems useful to you, I'm glad.
If not, don't worry. Just forget about it."
His Holiness The Dalai Lama
Bridget Conant
Posts: 2896
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 4:22 pm

Re: Pae & Defendant O'Leary's Council Take $2.1M From Hospital Fund to Cover General Fund Shortfalls

Post by Bridget Conant »

This doesn't look good.

So when Jenn Pae says the city can weather the loss of the million plus in income tax from the hospital employees, she lied?
cmager
Posts: 697
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 8:33 am

Re: Pae & Defendant O'Leary's Council Take $2.1M From Hospital Fund to Cover General Fund Shortfalls

Post by cmager »

You've been Pae'd.
Lori Allen _
Posts: 2550
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2015 2:37 pm

Re: Pae & Defendant O'Leary's Council Take $2.1M From Hospital Fund to Cover General Fund Shortfalls

Post by Lori Allen _ »

Come on, let's just relax. I hear the money was sent out to be laundered! But, who will pick it up? :roll:
Dan Alaimo
Posts: 2140
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 8:49 am

Re: Pae & Defendant O'Leary's Council Take $2.1M From Hospital Fund to Cover General Fund Shortfalls

Post by Dan Alaimo »

cmager wrote:You've been Pae'd.
Nice one, Bill.
“Never let a good crisis go to waste." - Winston Churchill (Quote later appropriated by Rahm Emanuel)
Meg Ostrowski
Posts: 466
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 10:42 am

Re: Pae & Defendant O'Leary's Council Take $2.1M From Hospital Fund to Cover General Fund Shortfalls

Post by Meg Ostrowski »

Brian Essi wrote:Here comes the consequences of Dreaming BIg....

ORDINANCE NO. 41 -16 -

$2.1M transferred out of the Lakewood Hospital Fund and into the General Fund

"In the event the General Fund needs fiscal year-end support"

What happens when they run out of the pennies they got from the sale of Lakewood Hospital?

Tax increases?

Hmmm
It could just be a housekeeping measure. Now that the city has assured the permanent closure of Lakewood Hospital, perhaps there is no longer a need for the hospital fund? Although I do recall it being used to support EMS, which we'll now need more than ever.

Like you, I am concerned about the long term consequences of this administration's "big dream." I would have preferred a more pragmatic approach to Lakewood's future.
“There could be anywhere from 1 to over 50,000 Lakewoods at any time. I’m good with any of those numbers, as long as it’s just not 2 Lakewoods.” -Stephen Davis
Brian Essi
Posts: 2421
Joined: Thu May 07, 2015 11:46 am

Re: Pae & Defendant O'Leary's Council Take $2.1M From Hospital Fund to Cover General Fund Shortfalls

Post by Brian Essi »

Meg Ostrowski wrote:
Brian Essi wrote:Here comes the consequences of Dreaming BIg....

ORDINANCE NO. 41 -16 -

$2.1M transferred out of the Lakewood Hospital Fund and into the General Fund

"In the event the General Fund needs fiscal year-end support"

What happens when they run out of the pennies they got from the sale of Lakewood Hospital?

Tax increases?

Hmmm
It could just be a housekeeping measure. Now that the city has assured the permanent closure of Lakewood Hospital, perhaps there is no longer a need for the hospital fund? Although I do recall it being used to support EMS, which we'll now need more than ever.

Like you, I am concerned about the long term consequences of this administration's "big dream." I would have preferred a more pragmatic approach to Lakewood's future.
This is not likely a housekeeping measure. Pae & the city audits booked all proceeds from "the sale of Lakewood Hospital to the Cleveland Clinic" as contributions to the Lakewood Hospital Fund (a city fund on the city's books that was set up years ago to handle rent received by the city from the hospital and the EMS squads.).

In the 2015 CAFR, the Hospital Fund increased roughly over $9.6M and $11M based upon cash and accrual methods, respectively.

So taking out such a round number like $2.1M from the greater sum of the fund seems to have a purpose. We are left with Pae's states purpose in the Ordinance unless the public record of the COW or Council Meeting shows otherwise. I was unable to attend the meetings and have not yet reviewed the entire record.

In the end, we are left with the written record and the lip service---which we all know may only be part of the story or a head fake by the public officials and the shadow "leaders" of the government.
David Anderson has no legitimate answers
Post Reply