More anti-64 ads than pro-Summers ads?

The jumping off discussion area for the rest of the Deck. All things Lakewood.
Please check out our other sections. As we refile many discussions from the past into
their proper sections please check them out and offer suggestions.

Moderator: Jim O'Bryan

Dan Alaimo
Posts: 2140
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 8:49 am

More anti-64 ads than pro-Summers ads?

Post by Dan Alaimo »

In this day of targeted advertising it's hard to tell what's going on in the big picture, but it seems like I'm seeing a lot more firepower going against issue 64 than for Mike Summers. Is anybody else seeing this? And if so, what do you think their reasoning is?
“Never let a good crisis go to waste." - Winston Churchill (Quote later appropriated by Rahm Emanuel)
cameron karslake
Posts: 646
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2015 8:35 am

Re: More anti-64 ads than pro-Summers ads?

Post by cameron karslake »

Seems to me that Issue 64 is what the administration and LHA is most afraid of. The crazy thing is is that while they say that Issue 64 will "doom" the hospital (which is BS), that is the EXACT thing Summers has been trying to do this whole year but has yet to accomplish for his buddies at CCF. If Issue 64 passes, it's the LHA money that will run out and they certainly don't want that. What will be left for the new "Wellness Foundation"? Nothing left for Summers' friends...awwww.

The whole city would be in much better shape if Summers courted real offers to run the hospital instead of turning a blind eye/ear to them. The people would not be divided and he would probably be a shoe-in for another term. Only negotiating with the rapacious CCF will be his and Lakewood's downfall should it come to pass.
Bill Call
Posts: 3319
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 1:10 pm

Re: More anti-64 ads than pro-Summers ads?

Post by Bill Call »

cameron karslake wrote:Seems to me that Issue 64 is what the administration and LHA is most afraid of. The crazy thing is is that while they say that Issue 64 will "doom" the hospital (which is BS), that is the EXACT thing Summers has been trying to do this whole year but has yet to accomplish for his buddies at CCF.
The Clinic is telling employees of the Hospital that if issue 64 passes they will close the Hospital immediately.

I did find it amusing and annoying that the LHA and Mayor are telling us the Hospital must be closed but if issue 64 passes it will be bad for Lakewood because it will force the Hospital to close. :lol:

I think there is more at stake than people realize. The Clinic intends to pull out next year. Why do they care if 64 passes or fails? Why do they care if we don't let them build their small medical office building?

Maybe they realize that if the court case continues:

the court orders the Clinic to provide releases to other interested parties and someone will be very interested in a $140 million business within a five minute drive of 150,000 people.

the documents the Clinic is forced to provide will prove fraud on the part of the Clinic.

A successful independent hospital in Lakewood would put the Clinics entire business plan at risk.
Dan Alaimo
Posts: 2140
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 8:49 am

Re: More anti-64 ads than pro-Summers ads?

Post by Dan Alaimo »

Bill Call wrote:
cameron karslake wrote:Seems to me that Issue 64 is what the administration and LHA is most afraid of. The crazy thing is is that while they say that Issue 64 will "doom" the hospital (which is BS), that is the EXACT thing Summers has been trying to do this whole year but has yet to accomplish for his buddies at CCF.
The Clinic is telling employees of the Hospital that if issue 64 passes they will close the Hospital immediately.
If that's the case, why don't they go public with it as it is a far scarier scenario that will sway the election?
“Never let a good crisis go to waste." - Winston Churchill (Quote later appropriated by Rahm Emanuel)
Bridget Conant
Posts: 2896
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 4:22 pm

Re: More anti-64 ads than pro-Summers ads?

Post by Bridget Conant »

The Clinic is telling employees of the Hospital that if issue 64 passes they will close the Hospital immediately.
Bully tactics.
Michael Deneen
Posts: 2133
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 4:10 pm

Re: More anti-64 ads than pro-Summers ads?

Post by Michael Deneen »

Dan Alaimo wrote:In this day of targeted advertising it's hard to tell what's going on in the big picture, but it seems like I'm seeing a lot more firepower going against issue 64 than for Mike Summers. Is anybody else seeing this? And if so, what do you think their reasoning is?
That's a question for Team Summers.

I have what I think is a pretty good theory...but I'll hold it until after the election.
Dan Alaimo
Posts: 2140
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 8:49 am

Re: More anti-64 ads than pro-Summers ads?

Post by Dan Alaimo »

I'm guessing that they think they have at least some chance of influencing a new administration - the major power brokers aren't on the ballot - but that will be impossible if 64 is in place.
Also I'm guessing they have some idea which way the mayoral election will go and think 64 is a better use of their money.
“Never let a good crisis go to waste." - Winston Churchill (Quote later appropriated by Rahm Emanuel)
Missy Limkemann
Posts: 551
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 2:13 pm
Location: Lakewood
Contact:

Re: More anti-64 ads than pro-Summers ads?

Post by Missy Limkemann »

Scrolling thru Facebook this morning and see this.... Seriously.... (and yes I purposely put it next to a pittie ad because we all know how everyone loves pitties....)
Attachments
64ad.jpg
64ad.jpg (232.91 KiB) Viewed 1655 times
Time is precious, waste is wisely
christopher dan
Posts: 60
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2015 4:48 pm
Location: ohio
Contact:

Re: More anti-64 ads than pro-Summers ads?

Post by christopher dan »

whos telling employees that if 64 passes the hospital will close immediately?


i work their and have heard non of this...still saying trying to make it till avon opens
Growing your own food that is pesticide and NON GMO-(genetically modified) is the key to health- www.cdan.towergarden.com :D
kate e parker

Re: More anti-64 ads than pro-Summers ads?

Post by kate e parker »

I can't wait til Tuesday.

vote no on 64!

am I allowed to say that?
Bridget Conant
Posts: 2896
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 4:22 pm

Re: More anti-64 ads than pro-Summers ads?

Post by Bridget Conant »

I can't wait til Tuesday!

VOTE YES ON 64!
Post Reply