The jumping off discussion area for the rest of the Deck. All things Lakewood.
Please check out our other sections. As we refile many discussions from the past into
their proper sections please check them out and offer suggestions.
dl meckes wrote:As long as they pay for the use (ASCAP, etc.), they can play whatever they want.
I believe that allows them a chance to play, but the artist also has a chance to say no. Many an artist has gotten wealthy off of people using their songs without asking, even after paying ASCAP.
I believe and Steve Davis can back me on this that Tom Waits, might be the biggest winner of all time for this.
FWIW
.
Jim O'Bryan
Lakewood Resident
"The very act of observing disturbs the system." Werner Heisenberg
"If anything I've said seems useful to you, I'm glad.
If not, don't worry. Just forget about it." His Holiness The Dalai Lama
I am just stunned and amazed that over the past two weeks we have ALL witnessed history in the making. From a president hopeful that is " of color" to a vice-president hopeful that is "testosterone challenged" I cannot believe this is the best we can do. Pit bull banter and comments on outfits has nothing to do with what we all just witnessed. Regardless of what your political affiliation is (And by the tone of this thread I would guess democratic...) we have all been a part of yet another historical moment which should not be demeaned by idle chatter over song choices and the cost of an outfit because both sides of the street are then open game and in my humble opinion equally culpable. So, if we are going to go down this road then let's do so fairly...if not, let's all take the high one and speak intelligently and stick with the issues at hand. Let the games begin.
jennifer scott wrote:I am just stunned and amazed that over the past two weeks we have ALL witnessed history in the making. From a president hopeful that is " of color" to a vice-president hopeful that is "testosterone challenged" I cannot believe this is the best we can do. Pit bull banter and comments on outfits has nothing to do with what we all just witnessed. Regardless of what your political affiliation is (And by the tone of this thread I would guess democratic...) we have all been a part of yet another historical moment which should not be demeaned by idle chatter over song choices and the cost of an outfit because both sides of the street are then open game and in my humble opinion equally culpable. So, if we are going to go down this road then let's do so fairly...if not, let's all take the high one and speak intelligently and stick with the issues at hand. Let the games begin.
Jennifer,
With all due respect...
Isn't the first woman running for President a bit more historic than the first woman to be nominated for VP?
Where was this post back in March when Ohio faced a challenging primary between the first candidate "of color" and the first "testosterone challenged" candidate?
I didn't see anyone sticking up for Hillary....
"Hey Kiddo....this topic is much more important than your football photos, so deal with it." - Mike Deneen
With all due respect to you Ivor. I am not sticking up nor putting down anyone. That was my point. I can start if you wish. It would not be pretty. My point simply was...history....on both sides of the street. We should all feel proud, not petty.
Again, never said who owned what, just thought the conversation could have been a bit more ...hmmm, well never mind. You are right Steven, it is working!
The GOP presidential candidate attracted roughly the same number of viewers to his convention acceptance speech Thursday as Obama did before the Democrats last week, according to Nielsen Media Research.
It marked the end of an astonishing run where more than 40 million people watched political speeches on three nights by Obama, McCain and Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin. The Republican convention was the most-watched convention on television ever, beating a standard set by the Democrats a week earlier.
It is not the "Republicans" who supported or initiated the pit bull ban.
It is the "We (the government) are way smarter than you (citizen) and we are going to protect you from yourself" crowd. I wish they had a shorter name for that. Oh wait, I think they do.
I laughed at the convention at the pitbull analogy because I knew the LO would be burning up.
well since they called her the pitbull, guess she can't come in to lakewood....she will get sent to the shelter and then put to sleep in the gas chamber at the county pound.
I am in a MOOD today....maybe a good run around the block will help me. LOL.
clicky