Infanticide - The New Abortion Right

Bill Call · Post by **Bill Call** » Wed May 06, 2009 12:27 pm

It seems abortion rights advocates are trying to beat the court to the punch on the new abortion right. Under the proposed legislation the killing of an infant under the age of one would be no big deal.

Brian Pedaci · Post by **Brian Pedaci** » Wed May 06, 2009 2:27 pm

Link?

Valerie Molinski · Post by **Valerie Molinski** » Wed May 06, 2009 2:36 pm

Bill Call wrote:It seems abortion rights advocates are trying to beat the court to the punch on the new abortion right. Under the proposed legislation the killing of an infant under the age of one would be no big deal.

You are ridiculous. Brian, he's not going to have a link because there isn't one. :roll:

Jim DeVito · Post by **Jim DeVito** » Wed May 06, 2009 2:39 pm

Bill you are getting a bit ridiculous on this one.

Phil Florian · Post by **Phil Florian** » Wed May 06, 2009 4:19 pm

Rush Limbaugh kills and eats one baby a year. Sorry, I don't have a link for that, either. :-)

Jim O'Bryan · Post by **Jim O'Bryan** » Wed May 06, 2009 4:43 pm

Bill Call wrote:It seems abortion rights advocates are trying to beat the court to the punch on the new abortion right. Under the proposed legislation the killing of an infant under the age of one would be no big deal.

Bill

I am confused. Does this mean you are not backing the president's health care plan, so that we can continue to lead the Western Hemisphere in early childhood deaths?

.

Bill Call · Post by **Bill Call** » Thu May 07, 2009 6:28 am

Jim O'Bryan wrote:I am confused. Does this mean you are not backing the president's health care plan, so that we can continue to lead the Western Hemisphere in early childhood deaths?

Infant mortality in the US is not much worse than in any other country. The higher rate in the United States is due to the increase in the number of premature births. Babies that were once still born or who died shortly after birth are now receiving enhanced health care. Some countries don't count short lived premies as live births and some have those premies killed as part of their eugenics programs.

http://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexch ... tality.cfm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_co ... rate_(2005)

Obama's plans will lead to increased death rates, more expensive health care, the end of medical innovation, rationing, the end of free choice in medicine and the enslavement of the medical profession. Other than that I guess it's OK.

Jim DeVito · Post by **Jim DeVito** » Thu May 07, 2009 7:00 am

Bill,

Why is it that anytime you provide a link to something it has the word "blog" or "opinion" in it?

It is ok Bill one day you will wake up in our new socialist paradise and kick yourself for being so negative. ;-)

If one day I wake up and you are right and it all goes to hell... Then perhaps that is the way it was meant to be. ;-)

Tim Liston · Post by **Tim Liston** » Thu May 07, 2009 8:31 am

Should the opinion of a pediatric cardiologist on matters of infant mortality be offhandedly dismissed simply because Bill brings them to our attention?

Brian Pedaci · Post by **Brian Pedaci** » Thu May 07, 2009 9:04 am

In other news, could the "Bill" character in the "Lakewoodites" comic strip featured in the latest Observer be based on our own resident curmudgeon and conspiracy theorist?

Valerie Molinski · Post by **Valerie Molinski** » Thu May 07, 2009 9:31 am

Brian Pedaci wrote:In other news, could the "Bill" character in the "Lakewoodites" comic strip featured in the latest Observer be based on our own resident curmudgeon and conspiracy theorist?

I was wondering the same exact thing.

sharon kinsella · Post by **sharon kinsella** » Thu May 07, 2009 9:45 am

Bill - Shame on you.

Jim DeVito · Post by **Jim DeVito** » Thu May 07, 2009 9:48 am

Tim Liston wrote:Should the opinion of a pediatric cardiologist on matters of infant mortality be offhandedly dismissed simply because Bill brings them to our attention?

It should be dismissed because I fail to see how it is relevant to Bill's claim...

Obama's plans will lead to increased death rates, more expensive health care, the end of medical innovation, rationing, the end of free choice in medicine and the enslavement of the medical profession. Other than that I guess it's OK.

I am sure I am missing something... Could some one enlighten me... (Note that was not sarcasm)

Bill Call · Post by **Bill Call** » Thu May 07, 2009 11:22 am

Valerie Molinski wrote:
Bill Call wrote:It seems abortion rights advocates are trying to beat the court to the punch on the new abortion right. Under the proposed legislation the killing of an infant under the age of one would be no big deal.

You are ridiculous. Brian, he's not going to have a link because there isn't one.

If a women kills a child under the age of one the "crime" would be punishable by two years in prison if the child was killed because the women was "depressed".

It is unclear whether or not the law would apply to women who kill someone else's child. It is also unclear if the law should be expanded to include men. Don't men get depressed? And anyway, if partial birth abortion is ok why not infanticide? How is partial birth abortion different than infanticide?

http://www.nbcdfw.com/news/local/Texas- ... e-Law.html

Jim DeVito · Post by **Jim DeVito** » Thu May 07, 2009 11:32 am

If you really cared about children you would be more concerned with the number of uninsured children.

http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www ... 10583.html

Infanticide - The New Abortion Right

Infanticide - The New Abortion Right

Re: Infanticide - The New Abortion Right

Re: Infanticide - The New Abortion Right

Re: Infanticide - The New Abortion Right

Re: Infanticide - The New Abortion Right