It seems he has no big problem with it:
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la- ... 2063.story
Or maybe he hates terrorism but loves the terrorist. Or maybe vide versa.
Does Eric Holder Support Terrorism?
Moderator: Jim O'Bryan
-
- Posts: 3317
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 1:10 pm
-
- Posts: 946
- Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 7:11 am
- Location: Lakewood, Ohio
-
- Posts: 2486
- Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 10:31 pm
-
- Posts: 672
- Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 3:31 pm
- Location: Lakewood
It's hard to believe that FALN didn't make some kind of financial contribution to Clinton and Democrats, like Marc Rich's wife.
Some say Holder was used in these pardons. I disagree. He knew full well what he was doing and didn't care. You think he'd be where he is today if did the right thing back then?
He doesn't support terrorists as much as he supports furthering his own political career.
Some say Holder was used in these pardons. I disagree. He knew full well what he was doing and didn't care. You think he'd be where he is today if did the right thing back then?
He doesn't support terrorists as much as he supports furthering his own political career.
I was going to sue her for defamation of character but then I realized I had no character – Charles Barkley
-
- Posts: 3317
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 1:10 pm
k
Charlie Page wrote:He doesn't support terrorists as much as he supports furthering his own political career.
I think that says it best.
For some reason this issue really bugs me. Those who think Holder and Clinton did nothing wrong should consider this:
If instead of the FLN terrorist being pardoned by a Democrat you had Republicans pardoning:
KKK members who planted bombs in black churches and killed ten children.
Abortion clinic bombers who killed ten doctors.
or
People who killed ten congressman because they wanted an independent Michigan.
would:
They be nominated for attorney general?
Would the media pretend the problem didn't exist?
Would the candidate have any chance of being confirmed?
-
- Posts: 2486
- Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 10:31 pm
ok
that is a very good point about federal legislators and their appointees taking money from the KKK or similar organizations.
Strom Thurmond probably ended up taking some money from the KKK - or similar organization - by default. that metaphorical statute of limitations on those kind of "Oops"es has probably worn out.
Strom Thurmond probably ended up taking some money from the KKK - or similar organization - by default. that metaphorical statute of limitations on those kind of "Oops"es has probably worn out.
"Is this flummery” — Archie Goodwin