Condoleezza Rice is pursuing the VP spot
Moderator: Jim O'Bryan
-
- Posts: 3281
- Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:36 pm
Condoleezza Rice is pursuing the VP spot
VP Rice
[quote]ABC News' Mary Bruce Reports: Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice is actively courting the vice presidential nomination, Republican strategist Dan Senor said.
“Condi Rice has been actively, actually in recent weeks, campaigning for this,â€
[quote]ABC News' Mary Bruce Reports: Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice is actively courting the vice presidential nomination, Republican strategist Dan Senor said.
“Condi Rice has been actively, actually in recent weeks, campaigning for this,â€
-
- Posts: 2486
- Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 10:31 pm
wow
I had lost so much interest I forgot she was Secretary of State.
No pro-Iraq invasion player has any business meeting with intellectually valid Tax Reform clubs. it must be one of those pretend Tax Reform clubs. because the words sound positive and engaging.
I am officially against Condaleeza Rice.
No pro-Iraq invasion player has any business meeting with intellectually valid Tax Reform clubs. it must be one of those pretend Tax Reform clubs. because the words sound positive and engaging.
I am officially against Condaleeza Rice.
-
- Posts: 3281
- Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:36 pm
Re: wow
That would definitely give McCain a better chance of winning....ryan costa wrote:I had lost so much interest I forgot she was Secretary of State.
No pro-Iraq invasion player has any business meeting with intellectually valid Tax Reform clubs. it must be one of those pretend Tax Reform clubs. because the words sound positive and engaging.
I am officially against Condaleeza Rice.

-
- Posts: 2486
- Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 10:31 pm
grover norquist
Whoever seeks the backing of Grover Norquist does not deserve to win. Whoever Grover Norquist backs does not deserve to win.
Like many liberterians, Grover Norquist confuses Freedom with having half a continent and only a few million people. However, the wikipedia bio states he is for no new taxes. That sounds pretty reasonable. The eisenhower taxes were pretty high before he was even born, although taxes were much lower for 95 percent of Americans. Tariffs were also a pretty high tax. they averaged between 30 to 40 percent for much of American history. Considering most of the distance intercontinental goods travelled then was by sail boat and then in a wagon pulled by an animal, eliminating income taxes would require even higher tariffs than then.
Condi Rice would have to run on the platform of being a tool for military contractors and freedom contractors. The modern understanding of Freedom is having cheap oil and cheap roads for living as far away from work as possible.
Like many liberterians, Grover Norquist confuses Freedom with having half a continent and only a few million people. However, the wikipedia bio states he is for no new taxes. That sounds pretty reasonable. The eisenhower taxes were pretty high before he was even born, although taxes were much lower for 95 percent of Americans. Tariffs were also a pretty high tax. they averaged between 30 to 40 percent for much of American history. Considering most of the distance intercontinental goods travelled then was by sail boat and then in a wagon pulled by an animal, eliminating income taxes would require even higher tariffs than then.
Condi Rice would have to run on the platform of being a tool for military contractors and freedom contractors. The modern understanding of Freedom is having cheap oil and cheap roads for living as far away from work as possible.
-
- Posts: 604
- Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 8:09 am
By Glenn Kessler
Condoleezza Rice wants it known: She is still not interested in being vice president.
Sean McCormack, her spokesman, today tried to dampen speculation that erupted Sunday after Dan Senor, a GOP political operative, claimed on ABC's "This Week" that Rice was "actively, actually in recent weeks, campaigning" for the job. Peppered with questions at the regular State Department briefing, McCormack reiterated that Rice wants to return to Stanford University, where she is a tenured professor.
"I think what she is considering is focusing on her work as Secretary of State because -- you may have missed it -- but there's actually quite a bit to do," McCormack said. "There's quite a bit left to do here as secretary of State."
Rice, in a recent interview with The Washington Times, claimed no interest in being vice president after nearly eight years in Washington and a year as a campaign adviser to then Governor George W. Bush. She said it was time for "new blood."
Speculation has centered on Rice because as a prominent African American woman, she would help balance out a GOP ticket that otherwise might appear too bland next to the excitement generated by either the first major-party black or female candidate.
However, as Bush's national security adviser in the first term, she is closely identified with the Iraq war -- at a time when Sen. John McCain, a war supporter, is trying to distance himself from the administration's foreign policy approach.
Senor cited as one piece of evidence the fact that Rice recently spoke at a conservative salon hosted by GOP activist Grover Norquist. Political eyebrows were also raised when Rice posed for a feature last week in Fitness magazine on her workout regimen.
McCormack dismissed both as perfectly ordinary. "I think if you look back at her tenure, in terms of her activities, you will find all of these activities perfectly normal and consistent with the way she has done her job over the past three years or so," he said. "If she is actively seeking the vice presidency, then she's the last one to know about it."
In fact, actively seeking a job would be out of character for Rice. Throughout her career, she has found herself unexpectedly chosen for high-level posts by powerful patrons, such as when she was named provost of Stanford without ever being a department head or even full professor.
Rice has mused about returning to the faculty at Stanford and perhaps writing a sober political science book that only policy wonks would want to read. But would the very ambitious Secretary really be able to resist a history-making bid for the vice presidency if McCain came knocking on her door?
That's unclear. But first McCain would have to ask.
The presumptive Republican nominee professed surprise on Sunday about the reports that Rice was seeking the job. "I missed those signals," he told reporters Sunday, though he called Rice a "great American."
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trai ... or_vp.html
Condoleezza Rice wants it known: She is still not interested in being vice president.
Sean McCormack, her spokesman, today tried to dampen speculation that erupted Sunday after Dan Senor, a GOP political operative, claimed on ABC's "This Week" that Rice was "actively, actually in recent weeks, campaigning" for the job. Peppered with questions at the regular State Department briefing, McCormack reiterated that Rice wants to return to Stanford University, where she is a tenured professor.
"I think what she is considering is focusing on her work as Secretary of State because -- you may have missed it -- but there's actually quite a bit to do," McCormack said. "There's quite a bit left to do here as secretary of State."
Rice, in a recent interview with The Washington Times, claimed no interest in being vice president after nearly eight years in Washington and a year as a campaign adviser to then Governor George W. Bush. She said it was time for "new blood."
Speculation has centered on Rice because as a prominent African American woman, she would help balance out a GOP ticket that otherwise might appear too bland next to the excitement generated by either the first major-party black or female candidate.
However, as Bush's national security adviser in the first term, she is closely identified with the Iraq war -- at a time when Sen. John McCain, a war supporter, is trying to distance himself from the administration's foreign policy approach.
Senor cited as one piece of evidence the fact that Rice recently spoke at a conservative salon hosted by GOP activist Grover Norquist. Political eyebrows were also raised when Rice posed for a feature last week in Fitness magazine on her workout regimen.
McCormack dismissed both as perfectly ordinary. "I think if you look back at her tenure, in terms of her activities, you will find all of these activities perfectly normal and consistent with the way she has done her job over the past three years or so," he said. "If she is actively seeking the vice presidency, then she's the last one to know about it."
In fact, actively seeking a job would be out of character for Rice. Throughout her career, she has found herself unexpectedly chosen for high-level posts by powerful patrons, such as when she was named provost of Stanford without ever being a department head or even full professor.
Rice has mused about returning to the faculty at Stanford and perhaps writing a sober political science book that only policy wonks would want to read. But would the very ambitious Secretary really be able to resist a history-making bid for the vice presidency if McCain came knocking on her door?
That's unclear. But first McCain would have to ask.
The presumptive Republican nominee professed surprise on Sunday about the reports that Rice was seeking the job. "I missed those signals," he told reporters Sunday, though he called Rice a "great American."
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trai ... or_vp.html
-
- Posts: 604
- Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 8:09 am
-
- Posts: 3281
- Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:36 pm
-
- Posts: 946
- Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 7:11 am
- Location: Lakewood, Ohio
Stephen Eisel wrote:not all mantras are trueValerie Molinski wrote:FWIW, I think if McCain is going to have a chance to win this election, he needs to distance himself further from this administration.... and NOT hire someone directly from it who has had such a hand in the failed policies of the last eight years.
Except that one

-
- Posts: 3281
- Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:36 pm
ok Michael MooreJim DeVito wrote:Stephen Eisel wrote:not all mantras are trueValerie Molinski wrote:FWIW, I think if McCain is going to have a chance to win this election, he needs to distance himself further from this administration.... and NOT hire someone directly from it who has had such a hand in the failed policies of the last eight years.
Except that one

-
- Posts: 946
- Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 7:11 am
- Location: Lakewood, Ohio
Stephen Eisel wrote:ok Michael MooreJim DeVito wrote:Stephen Eisel wrote:not all mantras are trueValerie Molinski wrote:FWIW, I think if McCain is going to have a chance to win this election, he needs to distance himself further from this administration.... and NOT hire someone directly from it who has had such a hand in the failed policies of the last eight years.
Except that one
Man even that hurts me.

-
- Posts: 3281
- Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:36 pm
I am sorryJim DeVito wrote:Stephen Eisel wrote:ok Michael MooreJim DeVito wrote:Stephen Eisel wrote:not all mantras are trueValerie Molinski wrote:FWIW, I think if McCain is going to have a chance to win this election, he needs to distance himself further from this administration.... and NOT hire someone directly from it who has had such a hand in the failed policies of the last eight years.
Except that one
Man even that hurts me.
