The right to not vote.

Open and general public discussions about things outside of Lakewood.

Moderator: Jim O'Bryan

Post Reply
Jim DeVito
Posts: 946
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 7:11 am
Location: Lakewood, Ohio

The right to not vote.

Post by Jim DeVito »

Stemming from my last post "Sad Day For Justice"

Presidential candidate Barack Obama voted against immunity, while Presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton was a no show.


Why is it ok not to show up for any vote? Am I wrong in thinking this should be required? I can not get my head around how anyone can justify not showing up for a vote on anything. For christ's sake this is 2008. Should they not be able to text message yea or nay to vote@senate.gov. (Yes that is not the best way to do it but you get the idea.)

Take Care All.

NOTE: The above was not a slam on Hillary, just used her to make a point.
Bryan Schwegler
Posts: 963
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 4:23 pm
Location: Lakewood

Post by Bryan Schwegler »

I agree. I see no reason why a member of Congress should have to be physically in the chamber to vote. They could call, text, or log on the internet and do it.

However sad that it is, I think all members of Congress miss some. There should be a way to make it easier given the ever connected world we live in now.

EDIT: I'm sure they all have Blackberries. :)
David Lay
Posts: 948
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 8:06 pm
Location: Washington, DC
Contact:

Post by David Lay »

I'm with you. There has to be a way to set up a secure voting system where the members of Congress don't have to be in the chamber to cast a vote.
New Website/Blog: dlayphoto.com
Post Reply