Issue 4

The jumping off discussion area for the rest of the Deck. All things Lakewood.
Please check out our other sections. As we refile many discussions from the past into
their proper sections please check them out and offer suggestions.

Moderator: Jim O'Bryan

Bill Call
Posts: 3319
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 1:10 pm

Re: Issue 4

Post by Bill Call »

Jim O'Bryan wrote:I will save the lecture on buying things you can afford, .........This post is so disappointing from a person running for the Board of, The Chamber Of Commerce!

.


The City of Lakewood has some of the highest taxes in the entire country. For those high taxes we get no more than people a few miles to the West. In many cases we get less.

More and more people are taking your advice, "on buying things you can afford". They are moving out of town. Is that the new building the brand message? YOU CAN'T AFFORD TO LIVE HERE!!

I see that a member of the school board and the City administration are seeking seats on the Chamber Board. Is that to guarantee two votes to endorse the next round of tax increases?
ryan costa
Posts: 2486
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 10:31 pm

oh

Post by ryan costa »

As I understand it, People in Westlake or Rocky River pay higher taxes, if only because they bought their homes at much higher prices.

In Lakewood you buy a home for a few ten thousand or hundred thousand dollars less. That's a loan you aren't paying interest on, or savings you will earn interest on.

It is taken for granted that everyone should own a home and sell it for a profit everytime they change careers or retire. This is actually a very small window in American history, and this norm will slide away.

Strickland is pushing a property tax break for seniors or retirees. That should ease the tax burden on people with fixed incomes who've already paid their dues and probably don't have kids in school or get police called on them often.
Kate McCarthy
Posts: 481
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 1:25 pm
Location: Lakewood

Post by Kate McCarthy »

Can we all please remember that we will lose the state monies if this does not pass...monies from taxes we have already paid that will not be returned to our community?

And to get back to the nuts and bolts...

This is our family's last year at Lincoln Elementary School. We have had a wonderful experience and will miss the school. But we won't miss sending our children to a school with bathroom facilities only in the basement and outdated classrooms.

The method that the State of Ohio uses to fund education was found to be unconstitutional before George Voinovich became governor and the state government has yet to remedy this problem. Let's work at the state level to lessen our tax burden. Let's not prove some point by voting down an Issue that is truly needed and will only end up punishing our own community. Those state funds will end up somewhere, let's make sure they end up here.
User avatar
Jim O'Bryan
Posts: 14196
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 10:12 pm
Location: Lakewood
Contact:

Re: Issue 4

Post by Jim O'Bryan »

Bill Call wrote:
Jim O'Bryan wrote:I will save the lecture on buying things you can afford, .........This post is so disappointing from a person running for the Board of, The Chamber Of Commerce!

.


The City of Lakewood has some of the highest taxes in the entire country. For those high taxes we get no more than people a few miles to the West. In many cases we get less.

More and more people are taking your advice, "on buying things you can afford". They are moving out of town. Is that the new building the brand message? YOU CAN'T AFFORD TO LIVE HERE!!

I see that a member of the school board and the City administration are seeking seats on the Chamber Board. Is that to guarantee two votes to endorse the next round of tax increases?



Bill


Do you have any facts that support this statement.

I believe Lakewood is leading the area in home sales.


FWIW


.
Jim O'Bryan
Lakewood Resident

"The very act of observing disturbs the system."
Werner Heisenberg

"If anything I've said seems useful to you, I'm glad.
If not, don't worry. Just forget about it."
His Holiness The Dalai Lama
Shawn Juris

Post by Shawn Juris »

So are we trying to become the highest taxed city? Is 2nd highest just not good enough for us? I have heard a variety of visions and goals but this one wasn't identified yet. Imagine the flood of new arrivals that will show up here because of some buildings. If only we could recruit James Earl Jones to produce some commercials to attract the throngs of people who would come here for reasons they don't understand to spend far more tax dollars to receive less in return. Hopefully there will be enough "brain drain" to convince those remaining to drop their stakes and live here.
Now if we could have a plan that showed how these structures were going to create scholars and give reason for others to be a part of it then maybe we would be onto something. I hadn't seen that so far though. While my research has been rather superficial, all that I've seen is Phase II, more money needed. My question is why wasn't this all asked for at one time? If it's because of the misguided state regulations, then fair enough just say it. The further question is why should we expect that there won't be continuous increases requested. The city doesn't seem to have a fix in the works for our financial woes so why would investments in entities that do not produce income make sense?
All that aside the buildings all look very pretty.
Jeff Endress
Posts: 858
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 11:13 am
Location: Lakewood

Post by Jeff Endress »

Now if we could have a plan that showed how these structures were going to create scholars and give reason for others to be a part of it then maybe we would be onto something. I hadn't seen that so far though


It's been out there....did you take a tour? Did you see the improvements geared solely towards education? Did you look? I'll bet not.

Jeff
To wander this country and this world looking for the best barbecue â€â€
Shawn Juris

Post by Shawn Juris »

Oh good more "discourse" (advisory board insulting anyone that disagrees). What I heard was that there would be amazing structures but didn't catch the part where they would be full of students that were miraculously changed because they were in a fancy new building. Boy, if I missed that, then I admit my error. Did the elaborate plan really include a process to create "stepford" students? I'd love to hear more, time is running out to change my mind and vote for this issue. If every vote counts then information would be far more effective.
Bill Call
Posts: 3319
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 1:10 pm

Post by Bill Call »

Considered in its entirety the school construction project is worthy of support. This bond issue and the next should be approved.

While the buildings were generally well maintained they were still going to need substantial updating and improvement in the coming years. That updating won't get any cheaper or easier as time goes by. Remember, we are on our own.

I tried voting twice on the new voting machines but I got an error message.

One election day years ago I was shaking hands with a county commissioner. As he pumped my right hand he asked if I had voted for him that day. I raised my left hand spreading my fingers wide and said "Five times". He stopped pumping.
Ivor Karabatkovic
Posts: 845
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 9:45 am
Contact:

Post by Ivor Karabatkovic »

I liked the projectors that drop out of the ceiling of every room. the wireless internet, the great libraries that will be filled with useful information. While sitting in my government and economics class taking 4 pages of notes, I noticed that the old projectors (which my teacher already had to replace since I've been in the class) just shake and are blurry. I thought to myself "if this issue passes, less kids will have headaches and feel dizzy after taking so many notes."

Everything in these buildings is new and up to date. I went to McKinley for elementary school and remember how rusty, old and disgusting everything was. no more of that. I remember at Horace Mann wiping dust off of the walls of my art class. you dare not lean against the wall in that school. I remember my freshman year at LHS when a cockroach fell from the steel beams onto a girls head and got stuck in her hair. (probably my favorite moment of my freshman year). My sophomore year was full of asbestos. I remember when they closed 2/3 of the new building and had asbestos detection meters at every corner of the hallway. I remember taking a math test and hearing the meters beep, and beep and beep some more. And my junior year we spent the time at lunch in the L-room lobby dodging cockroaches and ants. There will be no more of that, either. No more leaking ceilings, or windows that let in the cold december breeze.

Although the class of 2007 has 12 days of school left, it is in our hands that we vote for this issue so that many classes from this point on have a clean and productive environment to spend 8 hours of their day in.
"Hey Kiddo....this topic is much more important than your football photos, so deal with it." - Mike Deneen
Rick Uldricks

Post by Rick Uldricks »

Can the parents of the Cleveland kids who attend school in Lakewood vote for Issue 4?
Jeff Endress
Posts: 858
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 11:13 am
Location: Lakewood

Post by Jeff Endress »

I had asked Shawn "did you take a tour? Did you see the improvements geared solely towards education? Did you look? I'll bet not. "


His response:

Oh good more "discourse" (advisory board insulting anyone that disagrees). What I heard was that there would be amazing structures but didn't catch the part where they would be full of students that were miraculously changed because they were in a fancy new building. Boy, if I missed that, then I admit my error. Did the elaborate plan really include a process to create "stepford" students? I'd love to hear more, time is running out to change my mind and vote for this issue. If every vote counts then information would be far more effective.


Which I translate as,"No, I did not take a tour" "No, I did not see the improvements geared for education". "No, I did not look".

Hard for me to see where this is insulting.

Jeff
To wander this country and this world looking for the best barbecue â€â€
User avatar
Jim O'Bryan
Posts: 14196
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 10:12 pm
Location: Lakewood
Contact:

Post by Jim O'Bryan »

Shawn Juris wrote:Oh good more "discourse" (advisory board insulting anyone that disagrees).


Shawn

I love it when conversations start off like this. You will be good for the Chamber!

The schools, are set up to do marvelous things. Many of the things you complain about have been covered very well in the new schools had you actually gone through them.

Trouble makers are not kept out of the rooms, and put in special areas where schooling pressures can be applied, and hopefully breakthroughs can be made.

The special Ed rooms are set up with everything special ed students need, from easy to use lockers, to reflected lighting that has been proven to be best for children with Autism.

The wiring for the schools is not only incredible, but easy to service which has huge dividends.

Now I am sure it was all different when you were a kid. NOT. But these are schools we should be proud of. The city we can be proud of. I guess it is only the ones running for the chamber that dislike the city. Go figure, most don't live or work here anyway.

Me I like to finish what I start.


.
Jim O'Bryan
Lakewood Resident

"The very act of observing disturbs the system."
Werner Heisenberg

"If anything I've said seems useful to you, I'm glad.
If not, don't worry. Just forget about it."
His Holiness The Dalai Lama
Kenneth Warren
Posts: 489
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2005 7:17 pm

Post by Kenneth Warren »

Jim:

In fairness to the Lakewood Chamber of Commerce, I would note that executive director Kathy Berkshire sent out an e-mail to members encouraging us to vote Yes on Issue 4.

Yesterday I read something Mayor Harbarger had written in the early 90s on the value of public schools to Lakewood. He noted that Lakewood's property values will stand or fall on three pillars: safety, schools and services. He knew Lakewood's niche, and the slow process of rolling families and incremental investments through vintage starter housing stock.

Turn off the young population which sees hope in new schools and we will ramp up the absentee landlord holdings and difficult caseload?

Stop paying the piper pillars, and there is one certain direction.

When we say, world, you know what, the children inhabiting our city are not worth it, they are hopeless thugs and the ungodly spawn of Section 8, then we are taking both the moral measure of ourselves and value of lifestyles and valuation of real property, and thereby setting the stage for a drop to the bottom.

Kenneth Warren
Justine Cooper
Posts: 775
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 10:12 am
Location: Lakewood

Post by Justine Cooper »

OMG!! I could not believe this post!! After meeting you and seeing that you cared about Lakewood and have a child on the way I could not believe the $2 a month extra would be worth putting out messages against one of the best things going for Lakewood!!!! You want a guarantee that your house will appreciate, well it surely won't without this!!!

The security in the new schools are to be rivaled by all other cities!!! With the school shootings happening in every community, that alone is worth anything!!! The Lakewood High Choir just came back from performing in Carnegie Hall!! The Special Education program starts in pre-school here and is phenomenal!!! No one knows if their child will need those extra services one day! Every teacher my child has had for nine years has been exceptional!

I absolutely cannot think of money better spent and I HATE the high taxes here! Almost as much as the gas bills on these old homes, but I am here because these schools are what I want for my children. And all that aside, the 42 million we WON'T get if this doesn't pass should be incentive enough.

I PRAY the school will do better with residency check-ups, but why wouldn't we want the best regardless? This is not an attack, I am truly shocked and saddened by this post.
"Love and compassion are necessities, not luxuries. Without them humanity cannot survive" Dalai Lama
User avatar
Ryan Salo
Posts: 1056
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 3:11 pm
Location: Lakewood
Contact:

Post by Ryan Salo »

I will start by saying I voted FOR issue 4 today.

The reason I am posting here is to vent a little about how this process has gone. When the first bond was up they mentioned that it was a 3 part phase but really didn’t get into details about how much they would be. From talking with a lot of people many didn’t realize that there were even going to be 3. Most that I have asked even assumed that the third phase will be entirely paid for by the state funds (which I understand has the potential to disappear anyway if the legislature changes anything in the next 4 years). I was told by Geiger that their will be a third phase and it will be a tax increase.

I am OK with paying more for the schools. I really believe they will be beneficial. I also like people being upfront, even if it hurts their cause. My thought is that if the PRO campaign really laid out all the facts during the first phase it would have failed.

We cannot change the past; I just hope that future projects and campaigns will be honest, even at their own expense.
Ryan Salo
Post Reply