Grant, Lincoln To Be Rebuilt 7 not 6, State To Pay $50 Mill

The jumping off discussion area for the rest of the Deck. All things Lakewood.
Please check out our other sections. As we refile many discussions from the past into
their proper sections please check them out and offer suggestions.

Moderator: Jim O'Bryan

User avatar
Jim O'Bryan
Posts: 14196
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 10:12 pm
Location: Lakewood
Contact:

Grant, Lincoln To Be Rebuilt 7 not 6, State To Pay $50 Mill

Post by Jim O'Bryan »

Image
Then Lakewood Board of Education President in 2005, Ed Favre commences ground breaking.

Master Facility Plan Announced: Lakewood Will Have Seven Elementary Schools And A Finished High School

The signs were up at schools all over town at the end of last week: “Community Meeting, Grant School, Tuesday Night.” Robo-calls went out: Superintendent Patterson was inviting us to a brief but important meeting at Grant Elementary School. The purpose? An update on the District’s School Construction project, to bring the community up to speed on the latest development in the Master Facilities Plan.

For those of us with kids in the school system, this was a big meeting. Lakewood High School parents wondered when the high school building would be completed, along with Middle School parents whose children will be on their way to high school soon.

Elementary school parents who have been trying to figure out the best elementary school for their children, given the fact that a 2009 decision put Lakewood as a six-school District, wondered whether the time had come for one of our schools to close.

This decision had been updated as our enrollment increased. A June 2012 decision to announce an elementary school closure the following Fall was suspended as the enrollment figures made clear that all seven of our elementary schools were pretty full.

But we all awaited the Ohio Facilities Construction Committee’s (formerly the Ohio School Facilities Commission) final study of Lakewood’s population and its school buildings.

As people filed in, the buzz filled the room. Had Grant School been chosen as the location for this important meeting to honor it for its service, as its closure became final? Or had it been chosen to celebrate the fact that it was going to stay in service as a school? And, had the time come to finally FINISH Lakewood High School?

The room became silent as Superintendent Patterson took the podium. Since becoming Lakewood City Schools’ Superintendent, Mr. Patterson has been very forthcoming with the citizens of Lakewood, conducting meeting after meeting to engage with the community, and to understand what we value. He has been very thorough when describing the ins and outs, dollars and cents, of the Administration’s decisions affecting our children.

Tuesday night was no different. Mr. Patterson opened his speech reminding us of the community input given in over 30 meetings which made a 4 million dollar reduction in future expenditures possible along with the recent passage of a 3.9 mil operating levy by a majority of nearly 69%.

He then turned to the matter at hand: Our school system will soon have “a tremendous opportunity to complete our Master Facility Plan…” he said. He quoted Winston Churchill saying, “We shape our buildings, thereafter they shape us.” He explained how important our school buildings are to Lakewood’s future: “The design decisions we make today,” he said, “will help or haunt the educational process in Lakewood for the next 50 to 75 years. We must do so much more than cobble together rectangular classrooms in an efficient configuration. We must do our best to envision the needs of the future and ensure that our new facilities complement the efforts of the students and staff housed in them. I am convinced we can accomplish this challenge by working together.”

And then the big news was upon us. Superintendent Patterson explained that in mid-July the OFCC would in all probability declare our district eligible to receive $47 million to complete our Master Plan. in order to qualify for state funds the board will act upon the revised Master Facility Plan on June 3rd.

And finally, Mr. Patterson described what the June 3rd resolution would say: “I am excited to report that the resolution will provide for rebuilding ALL THREE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (Roosevelt, Grant and Lincoln) as well as completing the eastern end of Lakewood High School.”

The room erupted in applause.

How did this happen?

Patterson described how, working with OFCC, the Administration went after enrollment numbers and projections in several different ways, and stood their ground regarding their faith in Lakewood’s future, and its need for walkable schools. Currently, two independent sets of ten-year enrollment projections show that Lakewood is expected to grow an average of 35.8 students a year, each year, for ten years, for a total increase of 358 students. With those figures in hand, decisions could be made.

Mr. Patterson went on-- proving how well he understands Lakewood-- by describing how pleased he is that this plan will allow us to preserve what he described as our “treasured Lakewood tradition” of providing neighborhood schools.

The next task we must accomplish together is passing a bond to fund our portion of the project, he said. He expressed his appreciation for the knowledge, experience and collective wisdom brought to this process by the community, saying in conclusion, “Together we will complete the final phase of the Facility Master Plan.”

Board President Edward Favre then complimented Mr. Patterson and his administrative team for their continuing hard work and diligence in preparing for the OFCC's decision process.

As attendees took in the news, and prepared to ask questions (Superintendent Patterson is a big fan of feedback) the buzz in the room echoed his words. “This is great news for our school district, as more and more people are seeing Lakewood as a destination rather than a stepping stone. People are realizing what we have known for a long time. Lakewood is a great place to raise a family.”

More photos and info here:
http://lakewoodobserver.com/read/2013/05/28/master-facility-plan-announced-lakewood-will-have-seven-elementary-schools

.
Jim O'Bryan
Lakewood Resident

"The very act of observing disturbs the system."
Werner Heisenberg

"If anything I've said seems useful to you, I'm glad.
If not, don't worry. Just forget about it."
His Holiness The Dalai Lama
Michael Deneen
Posts: 2133
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 4:10 pm

Re: Grant, Lincoln To Be Rebuilt 7 not 6, State To Pay $50 M

Post by Michael Deneen »

Unless I'm mistaken, this is all dependent on a bond levy passing.

How soon does the levy need to pass in order to ensure the state funds?
Although the operating levy passed by a strong margin, I think it will be tough to pass another school issue so soon after the previous vote.
Kristine Pagsuyoin
Posts: 339
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 9:28 am

Re: Grant, Lincoln To Be Rebuilt 7 not 6, State To Pay $50 M

Post by Kristine Pagsuyoin »

Don't forget Roosevelt Elementary will also be rebuilt.

The district will need to pass the bond, along with the required permanent levy intended to maintain our new schools, 13 months after we get the go ahead from Ohio. They are set to meet in July and so at the latest the district would have until August 2014. However, I believe the goal is to have the bond on the ballot this November. The district will be asking taxpayers for something between 3 and 4 mil.
Tim Liston
Posts: 752
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 3:10 pm

Re: Grant, Lincoln To Be Rebuilt 7 not 6, State To Pay $50 M

Post by Tim Liston »

I would presume that the LCS Board got the news from the OFCC after the recent “operating” levy went on the ballot. I would also presume that the upcoming levy will go on the November ballot. Which means it can’t be passed in a clandestine fashion like the last one, when it was the only issue/candidate on the ballot, and prospective “no” votes probably didn’t even know it was on the ballot.

But whenever, I will be voting FOR the upcoming levy. And I will encourage the other three voting-age members of my family, and others I know, to vote for it. Because unlike the levy that just passed, it will (1) make a difference in educational outcomes here in Lakewood, (2) help cement Lakewood’s unique “neighborhood” school status, and of course (3) by doing so we garner an additional $50 million from the State. The recently-passed levy will achieve no useful outcomes that I can think of, at least insofar as Lakewood students are concerned….

Congrats and thanks to those responsible for this very positive development. What’s not to like?
Grace O'Malley
Posts: 680
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2005 8:31 pm

Re: Grant, Lincoln To Be Rebuilt 7 not 6, State To Pay $50 M

Post by Grace O'Malley »

Finally!

The high school MUST be completed!
Betsy Voinovich
Posts: 1261
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 9:53 am

Re: Grant, Lincoln To Be Rebuilt 7 not 6, State To Pay $50 M

Post by Betsy Voinovich »

What a meeting!

I don't think it's often that Jeff Patterson gets spontaneous applause-- he usually is delivering such serious news.

This was serious also but seriously good.

The crowd clapped at: "Seven schools! Grant staying open!" Eye to eye high fives around the room.

The crowd clapped at: "The high school will be finished!"

The crowd even clapped at: "Can we pass a bond so soon after a levy?"

When it was made clear that all three remaining elementary schools will be completely torn down and new schools built in their place--- there was some confused applause, which then stopped.

I sympathized with those in the crowd who love their old school buildings, Lincoln and Roosevelt. Now that I have a student at Lincoln (and one still at Grant) I understand the specialness of the white elephant Lincoln building with its hundreds of chimneys and other unique architectural details-- it's gorgeous and rambling. Some of it is air conditioned, some of it isn't-- you can get lost in some of its hallways. I think kids like the whole "Hogwarts" aspect of it, I know I do. I've never been in Roosevelt, but I know there are those who love that building too. Not too many in love with the 1969 Grant school building-- many in love with its staff, but the old Grant school stands proudly and gorgeously behind it, still serving the Board of Ed and functioning as one of the most historical buildings in Ohio.

From the time I spent on the Phase 3 Committee, I know that the "rebuilds" actually cost less than the "renovates" and of course, above all, the most important thing is preserving neighborhood schools. (Which preserve neighborhoods, which preserves our city. Because people know each other and they care.) Jeff Patterson referred to real neighborhood schools (schools actually in the neighborhoods where the children who attend live) as "a treasured Lakewood tradition."

Favorite moments from the meeting-- particularly if you compare this meeting to the meeting at which Grant was announced as the school that would be closed:

From Ahmie Yeung: "Can I get an 'I told you so'?"

From Jay Foran: "Hats off to you guys, this is really great news."

And finally, from our every day more beloved Superintendent, explaining that they really really have the statistics (the criteria) to prove that we need seven elementary schools, when he made a joke about how two independent sets of ten-year enrollment projections show that Lakewood is expected to grow an average of 35.8 students a year, each year, for ten years, for a total increase of 358 students-- his joke being about the ".8 student" we were left with. "Not sure how we ended up with the .8 student" -- and then as is his way, he patiently explained that the .8 came from averaging the two different studies.

Even the .8 student will be able to go to a neighborhood school.

Great job Superintendent Patterson, for having the courage, wisdom and patience to approach the state of Ohio again, and to dig in and get this thing done right. Great job to all in the Administration who came together to make this work. (Mr. Patterson made frequent references to his team last night, yielding the microphone to them when they had the specifics to answer questions posed by the group. They clearly work very well together.) And to our mostly long-time Board of Education for hanging in there steadfastly throughout this ever-changing process. This will make a big difference for a long time.

Thank you.

Betsy Voinovich

Jeff.jpg
Jeff.jpg (211.52 KiB) Viewed 2801 times

Lakewood City Schools' Superintendent Jeff Patterson makes sure every person in the packed house understands the Final Phase of the School Facilities plan.

Roxanne.jpg
Roxanne.jpg (216.12 KiB) Viewed 2801 times

Roxanne Ramsey, principal of Grant Elementary School looks on as the numbers spell out the situation. Grant will stay.

Christina.jpg
Christina.jpg (182.24 KiB) Viewed 2801 times

Co-chair of the successful levy committee and Lakewood supermom Christina McCallum sends eye-to-eye high fives to another parent further down her row.
Meg Ostrowski
Posts: 466
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 10:42 am

Re: Grant, Lincoln To Be Rebuilt 7 not 6, State To Pay $50 M

Post by Meg Ostrowski »

Such wonderful news for Lakewood!

Betsy Voinovich wrote:Not too many in love with the 1969 Grant school building--


...but with the inherent barriers increasing technology use is placing between us, spaces without walls may become a more valuable teaching tool than even the architects of that 1969 building ever imagined.

Betsy Voinovich wrote:the "rebuilds" actually cost less than the "renovates"


Grant may be an exception given its youth and steel construction.

Betsy Voinovich wrote:Great job Superintendent Patterson, for having the courage, wisdom and patience to approach the state of Ohio again, and to dig in and get this thing done right. Great job to all in the Administration who came together to make this work. (Mr. Patterson made frequent references to his team last night, yielding the microphone to them when they had the specifics to answer questions posed by the group. They clearly work very well together.) And to our mostly long-time Board of Education for hanging in there steadfastly throughout this ever-changing process. This will make a big difference for a long time.


A wonderful example of leadership. How lucky we are.
“There could be anywhere from 1 to over 50,000 Lakewoods at any time. I’m good with any of those numbers, as long as it’s just not 2 Lakewoods.” -Stephen Davis
Stan Austin
Contributor
Posts: 2465
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 12:02 pm
Contact:

Re: Grant, Lincoln To Be Rebuilt 7 not 6, State To Pay $50 M

Post by Stan Austin »

Meg Ostrowski wrote

[quote
...but with the inherent barriers increasing technology use is placing between us, spaces without walls may become a more valuable teaching tool than even the architects of that 1969 building ever imagined][/quote]
true enough Meg but let's face it,, Grant is just plain old plug ugly!!!!
Stan
Betsy Voinovich
Posts: 1261
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 9:53 am

Re: Grant, Lincoln To Be Rebuilt 7 not 6, State To Pay $50 M

Post by Betsy Voinovich »

Meg Ostrowski wrote:
Betsy Voinovich wrote:Not too many in love with the 1969 Grant school building--


...but with the inherent barriers increasing technology use is placing between us, spaces without walls may become a more valuable teaching tool than even the architects of that 1969 building ever imagined.

Betsy Voinovich wrote:the "rebuilds" actually cost less than the "renovates"


Meg Ostrowski wrote:Grant may be an exception given its youth and steel construction.


Hi Meg---

Yes! In fact, even with different architects, Grant would still be the exception, because of its youth and its steel construction. I'm not sure how the figures update for 2013 but back in 2009, it was under 5 million to renovate Grant. (And we were assured it could be a lovely school, without open walls, a new school built around its 1969 skeleton.) At the time it was around 12 million to rebuild Grant?

Unfortunately renovating Lincoln was over 20 million, rebuilding it was.. 16?

I'll have to look at the paperwork.

As we go forward with a bond issue in front of us, I'm sure all of this info will be vetted and shared as Superintendent Patterson mentioned the other night. Those are community meetings I will be happy to attend.

Meg Ostrowski wrote:Such wonderful news for Lakewood!


Yes-- really wonderful news for Lakewood.

Betsy Voinovich
Bret Callentine
Posts: 571
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 3:18 pm
Location: Lakewood

Re: Grant, Lincoln To Be Rebuilt 7 not 6, State To Pay $50 M

Post by Bret Callentine »

Personally, I'd love to see them renovate the education building and turn that into Grant, then level the old building and turn it into a legitimate playground for the school.

move the administrative offices to somewhere else temporarily and you can do the entire renovations without any disruption to the school year.

it's not whether or not I think the 60's structure is appealing or not, I just think that turning the other building into the school would keep the classic lakewood look going.
"I met with Bret one on one and found him impossible to deal with." - S.K.
Peter Grossetti
Posts: 1533
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2011 10:43 pm

Re: Grant, Lincoln To Be Rebuilt 7 not 6, State To Pay $50 M

Post by Peter Grossetti »

Bret Callentine wrote:move the administrative offices to somewhere else temporarily...


Well, we certainly have plenty of empty storefronts and office space to chose from! :(

:!:
"So, let's make the most of this beautiful day.
Since we're together we might as well say:
Would you be mine? Could you be mine?
Won't you be my neighbor?"

~ Fred (Mr. Rogers) Rogers
Kristine Pagsuyoin
Posts: 339
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 9:28 am

Re: Grant, Lincoln To Be Rebuilt 7 not 6, State To Pay $50 M

Post by Kristine Pagsuyoin »

The question was asked at the meeting if the board building could be addressed as part of the construction plan. Ohio prohibits any of the funds to be used to rebuild/renovate administration buildings. That would be a project that the district or taxpayers would have to fund.
Bret Callentine
Posts: 571
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 3:18 pm
Location: Lakewood

Re: Grant, Lincoln To Be Rebuilt 7 not 6, State To Pay $50 M

Post by Bret Callentine »

If the administration building is to become the new Grant Elementary, then we wouldn't be spending any money on an administration building, just a school. we're going to be renovating a building one way or the other, why not end up with another gem that shows off Lakewood.
"I met with Bret one on one and found him impossible to deal with." - S.K.
Kristine Pagsuyoin
Posts: 339
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 9:28 am

Re: Grant, Lincoln To Be Rebuilt 7 not 6, State To Pay $50 M

Post by Kristine Pagsuyoin »

True, Bret. And, maybe that can happen if the two are combined, or maybe only admin portion would not be covered by the state. I have often imagined how great it would be if the middle of our city was an education hub. U of A is right across the street. Yet, the admin building has to go somewhere and if that moves to another location in the city the state wouldn't pay for that. During Phase 3 we heard that to move the board building would cost in the neighborhood of 6 million dollars. I have no idea how accurate that statement was then or now (current treasurer at the time shared that cost).

I am hoping the district goes with an architect that is visionary and grasps the wonderful opportunities that developing the Grant area could offer. Another trend has been to provide human services right in the school to easier target families/kids who need the help. This really makes the school a neighborhood school allowing for better collaboration and paths to meaningful community building. I hope that many different types of people are consulted for these projects. Really, it could be a wonderful opportunity for many new ideas!
Bret Callentine
Posts: 571
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 3:18 pm
Location: Lakewood

Re: Grant, Lincoln To Be Rebuilt 7 not 6, State To Pay $50 M

Post by Bret Callentine »

6 million?!?!?!?! to move some personnel, switch some phone and data lines, and move a bunch of file cabinets? Who pitched THAT number, because I'd say the county corruption investigation might have missed a couple people.
"I met with Bret one on one and found him impossible to deal with." - S.K.
Post Reply