Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2008 5:35 pm
If this works...this is Batman (my registered Boxer/English Bulldog mix) The warden called him a lab/bulldog mix


I have a ton more....LOL


I have a ton more....LOL
Neighbors Celebrating Free Speech and Intellectual Diversity While Speaking Over The Digital Fence
https://deck.lakewoodobserver.com/


Lynn, that's a good question and one I've been wondering about too (we all know what the answer is). But this just highlights how ridiculous this whole issue is. Instead of looking at whether a specific dog is vicious, we're talking about doing DNA tests to see if the dog has Staffordshire Terrier in it or whatever. How much makes it dangerous? 10%? 20%? If a dog is 49% "pit" it's a good dog, but 51% will rip your throat out?Lynn Farris wrote:Just a question for Councilman Powers or Bullock who seem to be championing this issue.
Will the burden of proof lie with the city to prove the dog is a pit bull or a pit bull mix or with the homeowner to prove that it isn't?
Historically in this country one is innocent until proven guilty. Has there been any cost considerations of how much it will cost to do DNA testing on these dogs if the owners claim they aren't pit bulls?
Currentlly isn't the cost an issue on people accused of capital crimes to have DNA testing done to exonerate them before they are executed? Certainly if it is so expensive that it is an issue to have these tests done for people accused of serious crimes, do we want to spend that money on a dog?