something he is infamous for.
Yeah this group is positive.
So much for fact finding, so much for truth, so much for positive looking forward.
One week and they are in the gutter lower then low.
.
Moderator: Jim O'Bryan
Bridget Conant wrote:Hysterical! Sounds like RU Irish Eyes is a wee bit jealous of Mr O'Bryan.
Brian Essi wrote:They actually think that Jim limits users on the Deck.
How do they explain that the Observer let's almost anyone's opinions be printed?
These people turn facts and logic on their heads.
They are losing the debate so they hide behind fake names and phony fantasy world ideas.
If they weren't afraid of the truth, they would not be jealous of Jim to the point they feel the need to attack him.
Another case of the "victim bully shoot the messenger syndrome"!
Jim O'Bryan wrote:Brian Essi wrote:They actually think that Jim limits users on the Deck.
How do they explain that the Observer let's almost anyone's opinions be printed?
These people turn facts and logic on their heads.
They are losing the debate so they hide behind fake names and phony fantasy world ideas.
If they weren't afraid of the truth, they would not be jealous of Jim to the point they feel the need to attack him.
Another case of the "victim bully shoot the messenger syndrome"!
Brian
This is an illusion, the work of one psychopath brought in to be the thug, and they knew it.
Two people have been limited on the Deck, one for copyright, the other because he is a
psychopath, dangerous to people that disagree, and we were not comfortable continuing
giving him full access to member list, etc.
One moved away, the other refuses to talk about the very real things we caught him doing
before letting him back.
This city, has a sickness, caused by a very small handful of people that are control freaks.
They are about to give the city a black eye that will hurt this city for a long time.
I wish they could grow up, tell the truth, and treat residents like adults.
AND THAT IS WHY SOME HATE ME?
That is all I have ever asked from them. Seems logical and easy.
Maybe psychopath should be psychopaths?
Kids doing it are one thing, 40,50 60 year olds, they should seek help.
.
Corey Rossen wrote:Who? Please use their real name and their job title when making your statements. Thank you. Enough circling the bush, just say who it is if you know. Reading this thread without you using actual names and titles is worthless.
Can you prove who it actually is? If so, prove it and get past these innuendos.
Thank you.
Corey
Jim O'Bryan wrote:Corey Rossen wrote:Who? Please use their real name and their job title when making your statements. Thank you. Enough circling the bush, just say who it is if you know. Reading this thread without you using actual names and titles is worthless.
Can you prove who it actually is? If so, prove it and get past these innuendos.
Thank you.
Corey
Corey
Sorry, just got back online here.
Of course as you know when people use fake names on websites it is hard to dig and find
facts because usually those people have other issues to hide as well.
But, it is hard to hide on the net.
Working on two papers, and photos from a great day yesterday.
.
.
Corey Rossen wrote:[
So...how do you know it is a member, let alone founding member? How can you accuse without knowing for certain who it is? You pride yourself on using real names on this site, I get it but how can you accuse someone of something without any facts, proof, or anything to fall back on.
Names please. Thank you.
Otherwise I see this as just spinning, or Marketing 101 but without proof or facts.
Corey
Jim O'Bryan wrote:Corey Rossen wrote:[
So...how do you know it is a member, let alone founding member? How can you accuse without knowing for certain who it is? You pride yourself on using real names on this site, I get it but how can you accuse someone of something without any facts, proof, or anything to fall back on.
Names please. Thank you.
Otherwise I see this as just spinning, or Marketing 101 but without proof or facts.
Corey
Corey
All you are doing is throwing out you assumptions, without looking at the big picture. It
would be wrong to let any of these groups continue without seeing the proof. Do you
know that was not done?
Legal things take time, some days, some weeks, some months. When people hide it can
take years, but over the course of years people say things slips are made, even good
folks like you help add to the picture.
I am trying to figure out your connection as we have spoken of this in person many times,
you were the one who said, "go to the police" which I did.
Now it is up to them, and I hope those who know, clean up their groups as it would be sad
to see all this get thrown away because of sideshows and others issues.
Just like so many things we will let the police do their magic, let the courts do their magic,
and let time do its magic.
Over and out for today. Back to the paper.
.
who do you suspect it is? You did start this thread so, who are you accusing?Jim O'Bryan wrote:Thanks Corey,
I take that under advisement.
Hard to use real names, when the person in question doesn't.
But it does not make it impossible.
.
.
cameron karslake wrote:Could this be Lakewood building inspector and BL founding member Rick Uldricks?
The profile written about in this thread fits with his profile mentioned in an earlier thread concerning cyber attacks and fake names.
http://lakewoodobserver.com/forum/viewt ... =7&t=13604