It will be rammed down our throats by those that slaughter our city.
The most vibrant cities cater to all aspects of intermodal transportation and make room for them, providing the tools for them to take root and thrive. Not many ride on Madison right now because it will eat a car with no problem... can you imagine riding a bike on it until it is resurfaced? If you build it, they will come.
If one reads and understand Jones's "The Slaughter of Cities" or Jacob's "Life and Death of the American City," this might make more sense. Jones discusses urban renewal as a way of segregating and white washing areas and driving minorities to the exurbs. In Cleveland and the inner ring suburbs, there is a huge population of younger people and lower income people in Cleveland who cannot afford a car. They rely heavily on bicycle or bus transport. So this is not just about the rich guy riding to his law office downtown.
Providing both of bicycling and public transportation modality is actually in direct conflict with moves that would 'slaughter or destroy the city' itself. These types of plans to allow for bike or bus travel actually can help to egalitize the ability to live and be comfortable in a city. They can help to provide safe places for people of all socio economic and ethnic groups to thrive as places like Lakewood did in the past.
Jacob's premise is that places are made and cities thrive because of 100 walkable or equally accessible destinations. Catering to big box, big parking and big car creates nothingness. Cities are made better through smaller community connections.