Matthew John Markling wrote:Jim O'Bryan wrote:The entire world understands you are not a fan of Mike Summers, we get it. And I am lucky enough to know the story from both sides.
Jim,
There are not two sides of this story.
You are simply trying to marginalize the discussion so shame on you.
But, I don't like Mike Summers.
And I find it ironic that I'm still among the few who seem to be fighting for the elected mayor position in spite of my dislike for Mike.
I still believe that elections have consequences.
And if the residents of Lakewood like Mike, he will continue to be elected as our mayor.
Frankly, I trust the electorate and the democratic system a lot more than I trust “City Hall and Friends” because we are going to end up with the following
when we go down the unelected city manager route:
Jim O'Bryan wrote:At the same time if City Council does this and hires some of the same people here, they need to be run from office, immediately. From two council members I have heard hints at two names that make me shiver, as their level of expertise is right there or below that of an ex-nun.
*** If they hire a city manager from within, or someone that just fell out of city manager school, they should all be looked at closely in their next election.
You know that the above is the current game plan, Jim.
"City Hall and Friends" have not even thrown Mike off his throne yet and they already have his unelected city manager successor lined up.
I'm still trying to figure out why you are playing the unelected city manager game when you already know the final score.
Matt
Matt
I am willing to trust the process. Had the "Friends of City Hall" not sure who this is, but
plotted back when it was first mentioned, they would still be waiting to deliver the plan
20 years later.
I am more than willing to let the process go through. Last time they put City Manager in
front of council, it was rejected, as was everything else on the review.
Even if it gets through it still needs to go to a vote, and pass. I know of people on both
sides of this willing to fight for or against it right up until the election.
Let's be honest the biggest problem for years was that residents trusted council to do the
right thing about as much as they trusted the mayor. So it became moot.
However I cannot turn every decision by this group at City Hall with the question of City
Manager. Nor does it make sense to turn all threads into a war against Mayor Michael
Summers.
I believe that City Hall has truly lost their way.
I personally believe a City Manager MIGHT correct that.
What I realize is that, it matters little if they appoint a successor, or hire their friends as
it looks now. However this is Lakewood City Council's moment in the sun, and if they are
going to hire a professional based on friendship, they are nice, or for any reason outside
of vision and accomplishments, then they deserved to be removed from elected office.
Right now the same names are being touted by council for both the next mayor and/or
city manager, which indicates to me, Dr. Kellor and Steve have not done a good job in
explaining to council what a great opportunity it could be for them and the city. If it is used
as a way to get incompetent people into secure good paying jobs running our city, then
they will be complicit in downfall.
What I think all of us have come to understand is that the City Charter needs a complete
overhaul, right down to elections and appointments.
We need to break the pattern of Elected officials treating residents like the problem,
instead of the reason for being there in office.
.