An alternative future for Lakewood Hospital

The jumping off discussion area for the rest of the Deck. All things Lakewood.
Please check out our other sections. As we refile many discussions from the past into
their proper sections please check them out and offer suggestions.

Moderator: Jim O'Bryan

Bill Call
Posts: 3319
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 1:10 pm

An alternative future for Lakewood Hospital

Post by Bill Call »

The Cleveland Clinic has made it quite clear that they have no intention of allowing the Hospital to compete with Clinic owned properties. The price of that policy is the underutilization of Lakewood Hospital and the loss of medical jobs and medical service in Lakewood.

Why should Lakewood residents have to drive to Avon for medical treatment?

Perhaps it’s time to cut the cord and let the Clinic go. Perhaps it's time for Lakewood Hospital to declare its independence.

There are still doctors out there who want to practice medicine; there are specialist who want to keep their independence and medical professionals who are eager to achieve independence.

http://www.surgerycenterok.com/
http://samaritanministries.org/surgery- ... t-pricing/

Fixed prices?
Listed prices?
Free market health care?

It works in Canada:
http://www.city-journal.org/html/17_3_c ... hcare.html

The seed money could come from the $1 billion in damages the Clinic has done to Lakewood by its willful and systematic dismantling of Lakewood Hospital.
User avatar
Jim O'Bryan
Posts: 14196
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 10:12 pm
Location: Lakewood
Contact:

Re: An alternative future for Lakewood Hospital

Post by Jim O'Bryan »

Bill Call wrote:The seed money could come from the $1 billion in damages the Clinic has done to Lakewood by its willful and systematic dismantling of Lakewood Hospital.


Bill

According to you, it is the negligence of the landlord that allowed this to happen.

But you do raise an interesting question.

IF we were to lose the hospital, could it even be saved?

The city has no funds for Basketball Courts or keeping parks open. They are now asking us
to park on other streets so that we can handle recycling at the same efficiency level as
now, as pointed out by Matthew Lee, to save $40,000.

Where would the city find any funds to even keep the services here in any scope?

When does our community investment in "Downtown Renaissance" pay its dividend?

.
Jim O'Bryan
Lakewood Resident

"The very act of observing disturbs the system."
Werner Heisenberg

"If anything I've said seems useful to you, I'm glad.
If not, don't worry. Just forget about it."
His Holiness The Dalai Lama
Matthew Lee
Posts: 533
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:15 am

Re: An alternative future for Lakewood Hospital

Post by Matthew Lee »

This raises another good point. I saw that Lakewood wants to spend $400,000 on Madison Park.

Not that I oppose spending money on parks, but where is THAT money coming from?
User avatar
Jim O'Bryan
Posts: 14196
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 10:12 pm
Location: Lakewood
Contact:

Re: An alternative future for Lakewood Hospital

Post by Jim O'Bryan »

Matthew Lee wrote:This raises another good point. I saw that Lakewood wants to spend $400,000 on Madison Park.

Not that I oppose spending money on parks, but where is THAT money coming from?



Matthew

And how can they spend that kind of money on a park they closed early because they was
not enough funding to keep the parks open past "dusk" even though they are lit and used
way past "dusk?"

Where does that money come from, yet others are told, we are broke. We need to save
$40,000.

Something is not adding up, again.

.
Jim O'Bryan
Lakewood Resident

"The very act of observing disturbs the system."
Werner Heisenberg

"If anything I've said seems useful to you, I'm glad.
If not, don't worry. Just forget about it."
His Holiness The Dalai Lama
Post Reply