Obama Refused to Call Benghazi 'Terror,' CBS Covered Up

Open and general public discussions about things outside of Lakewood.

Moderator: Jim O'Bryan

kate e parker

Re: Obama Refused to Call Benghazi 'Terror,' CBS Covered Up

Post by kate e parker »

Funny how selective liberal outrage works.. .. Drone attacks and civilian casualties did not magically stop when Obama took office in 2009..


stephen stephen stephen. don't you get it? the bush card has been played in this thread. game over. bush lied and all i got was this lousy t-shirt.
Stephen Eisel
Posts: 3281
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:36 pm

Re: Obama Refused to Call Benghazi 'Terror,' CBS Covered Up

Post by Stephen Eisel »

O'pointer finger can do no wrong.. what was I thinking..
Stephen Eisel
Posts: 3281
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:36 pm

Re: Obama Refused to Call Benghazi 'Terror,' CBS Covered Up

Post by Stephen Eisel »

http://washingtonexaminer.com/mccain-pu ... le/2513488

“This president — this administration — has either been guilty of colossal incompetence or been engaged in a coverup, neither of which is acceptable to the American people,” McCain said on the Senate floor today. “I speak as a friend of Christopher Stevens, I speak as a person who knows something about warfare, I speak as something of an authority — that this attack could have been prevented if the information on the ground had been taken into consideration.”
kate e parker

Re: Obama Refused to Call Benghazi 'Terror,' CBS Covered Up

Post by kate e parker »

Image
Sandra Donnelly
Posts: 79
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 1:46 am

Re: Obama Refused to Call Benghazi 'Terror,' CBS Covered Up

Post by Sandra Donnelly »

Stephen Eisel wrote:http://washingtonexaminer.com/mccain-punches-back-at-obama-on-benghazi-youre-incompetent-or-corrupt/article/2513488

“This president — this administration — has either been guilty of colossal incompetence or been engaged in a coverup, neither of which is acceptable to the American people,” McCain said on the Senate floor today. “I speak as a friend of Christopher Stevens, I speak as a person who knows something about warfare, I speak as something of an authority — that this attack could have been prevented if the information on the ground had been taken into consideration.”


Ever consider that he speaks as someone who has an axe to grind because he was defeated in the last election and was naive enough to think that teaming up with a moronic VP candidate would seal the female vote? McCain's colossal incompetence was underestimating the intelligence of women. His personal agenda is pathetically obvious.
Stephen Eisel
Posts: 3281
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:36 pm

Re: Obama Refused to Call Benghazi 'Terror,' CBS Covered Up

Post by Stephen Eisel »

Sandra Donnelly wrote:
Stephen Eisel wrote:http://washingtonexaminer.com/mccain-punches-back-at-obama-on-benghazi-youre-incompetent-or-corrupt/article/2513488

“This president — this administration — has either been guilty of colossal incompetence or been engaged in a coverup, neither of which is acceptable to the American people,” McCain said on the Senate floor today. “I speak as a friend of Christopher Stevens, I speak as a person who knows something about warfare, I speak as something of an authority — that this attack could have been prevented if the information on the ground had been taken into consideration.”


Ever consider that he speaks as someone who has an axe to grind because he was defeated in the last election and was naive enough to think that teaming up with a moronic VP candidate would seal the female vote? McCain's colossal incompetence was underestimating the intelligence of women. His personal agenda is pathetically obvious.

LOL... not John McCain
User avatar
Jim O'Bryan
Posts: 14196
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 10:12 pm
Location: Lakewood
Contact:

Re: Obama Refused to Call Benghazi 'Terror,' CBS Covered Up

Post by Jim O'Bryan »

kate e parker wrote:
Funny how selective liberal outrage works.. .. Drone attacks and civilian casualties did not magically stop when Obama took office in 2009..


stephen stephen stephen. don't you get it? the bush card has been played in this thread. game over. bush lied and all i got was this lousy t-shirt.


Kate

Not that simple.

My point is two fold.

Let's take this nightmares in order. Not to see GWB in jail, but to understand what is going
on. For 8 years many of us spoke of the outrage of starting the war, moving it to Iraq, at
the war profiteering by companies GWB, Cheney and family members had major ownership
of, and of course the trillions that went to him.

Then there is the 250,000+ innocent deaths over there and the 4,000+ American
servicemen and women that died, and the 2,000+ hired Americans that have been killed.
All over 2,000 Americans killed in the World Trade Center bombing.

Would it not be nice to understand how GWB fooled the entire right and some of the left?

What were the lies, where did they start?

I think to call for inquiries into this, by people that fluff off, the other is ridiculous.

When it comes from people that demanded respect for the office of the presidency, but
not need to roast the black man, is disgusting.

Fluff away, my dear Kate and Stephen.

.
Jim O'Bryan
Lakewood Resident

"The very act of observing disturbs the system."
Werner Heisenberg

"If anything I've said seems useful to you, I'm glad.
If not, don't worry. Just forget about it."
His Holiness The Dalai Lama
Stephen Eisel
Posts: 3281
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:36 pm

Re: Obama Refused to Call Benghazi 'Terror,' CBS Covered Up

Post by Stephen Eisel »

Jim never let the facts stand in the way of a rant.... :roll: The subject of this thread is the Benghazi terror attack on 9-11. Why are you trying to change the subject? Why are you trying to put the focus on Bush in this thread? Do you have BDS? Bush Derangement Syndrome....
Stephen Eisel
Posts: 3281
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:36 pm

Re: Obama Refused to Call Benghazi 'Terror,' CBS Covered Up

Post by Stephen Eisel »

Jim, you can recite numbers but do you actually understand how these people died or who was ultimately responsible for their untimely deaths? You obvious do not. And if you truly cared about the numbers you recite then you would have taken the time to investigate. And not just post them in such a casual matter to make a cheap political point.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog ... eport-data
kate e parker

Re: Obama Refused to Call Benghazi 'Terror,' CBS Covered Up

Post by kate e parker »

When it comes from people that demanded respect for the office of the presidency, but not need to roast the black man, is disgusting.


wow obama's black? thanks for pointing that out obryan.

not sure what you're trying to say there. well, actually i am. your bush argument barely holds water so you went for the next best straw man...if one is against obama he/she must therefore be racist.

again predictable with a side of disgusting (your word).
Stephen Eisel
Posts: 3281
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:36 pm

Re: Obama Refused to Call Benghazi 'Terror,' CBS Covered Up

Post by Stephen Eisel »

When it comes from people that demanded respect for the office of the presidency, but not need to roast the black man, is disgusting.



says the man
Fluff away, my dear Kate and Stephen.




when all else fails and you do not have a logical argument then play the race card.. Funny, how Jim's fellow left wingers in the press did not support Herman Cain.. So maybe it is not about color.. just sayin
Stephen Eisel
Posts: 3281
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:36 pm

Re: Obama Refused to Call Benghazi 'Terror,' CBS Covered Up

Post by Stephen Eisel »

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/11/ ... -petraeus/


The evidence that Gen. David Petraeus, formerly the commander of US troops in Afghanistan, the author of the current Army field manual, Princeton Ph.D. and, until last week, the director of the Central Intelligence Agency, was forced to resign from the CIA to silence him is far stronger than is the version of events that the Obama administration has given us.

The government would have us believe that because the FBI confronted Petraeus with his emails showing a pattern of inappropriate personal private behavior, he voluntarily departed his job as the country’s chief spy to avoid embarrassment. The government would also have us believe that the existence of the general’s relationship with Paula Broadwell, an unknown military scholar who wrote a book about him last year, was recently and inadvertently discovered by the FBI while it was conducting an investigation into an alleged threat made by Broadwell to another woman. And the government would as well have us believe that the president learned of all this at 5 p.m. on Election Day.
Stephen Eisel
Posts: 3281
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:36 pm

Re: Obama Refused to Call Benghazi 'Terror,' CBS Covered Up

Post by Stephen Eisel »

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2012 ... da-Element

Petraeus Testified al-Qaeda Element Removed From Rice's CIA Talking Points
User avatar
Jim O'Bryan
Posts: 14196
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 10:12 pm
Location: Lakewood
Contact:

Re: Obama Refused to Call Benghazi 'Terror,' CBS Covered Up

Post by Jim O'Bryan »

Kate, Stephen

I know you realize Obama is black, the first thing you probably noticed.

AS for argument about Bush not holding water. It would seem only the hard core Rs like you
and Stephen have this "we cannot talk about that" (Bush rapping the country, Romeny's
religion, failure o the Rs to spend the money Clinton asked for to build up protection of
embassies, Romeny's flip flopping, Cheney's depleting the USA of billions for his own
interest.

Nope, can't talk about that. Let's pick on the black president for another 4 years, while we
prove to the world we are hypocrites about everything we claim to stand for.

Please investigate Benghazi, then please announce the investigation into the Iraq War both
1 and 2. All of this has got to be understood.

My gripe with the other haters in the R party, do not tell me for one second you care about
the death of four Americans, while you turn your back on genocide caused by Bush.

It is just disingenuous and hypocritical which is quickly becoming the brand call Republican.

And to Kate and Stephen our hardcore Rs, can't you see the hypocrisy?

.
Jim O'Bryan
Lakewood Resident

"The very act of observing disturbs the system."
Werner Heisenberg

"If anything I've said seems useful to you, I'm glad.
If not, don't worry. Just forget about it."
His Holiness The Dalai Lama
Stephen Eisel
Posts: 3281
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:36 pm

Re: Obama Refused to Call Benghazi 'Terror,' CBS Covered Up

Post by Stephen Eisel »

Kate, Stephen

I know you realize Obama is black, the first thing you probably noticed.



When it comes from people that demanded respect for the office of the presidency, but not need to roast the black man, is disgusting.



The only person pointing out color or race in this thread is you Jim.. Do you have a problem with race?

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.p ... e%20baiter

race baiter


One who insinuates that racism or bigotry is a dominant factor with regards to an event that either does not involve race or in which diverse cultures are involved are simply a minor element.

Not race baiting (race was a primary factor): The U.S. Civil War was fought by white supremacists who wanted to maintain slavery.
-
Not race baiting (statement of facts): A white kid and a black kid got into a fight at school today.

Race baiter (insinuating race): A person of color was abused by a white at school today, just another day in the U.S. of K.K.K.A.
-
Not race baiting: When the Europeans came to America, vast differences in culture led to numerous conflicts with Native Americans on a broad number of issues, most of which the Europeans won.

Race baiter: When the pilgrims landed, they proceeded to exterminate the defenseless Indians from the land.
Post Reply