So, what do you make of the following story...
http://www.cleveland.com/lakewood/index.ssf/2012/07/lakewood_residents_indicted_fo.html
only 2 of the 7 indicted were from Lakewood, so why do they grab the headline?
Suburban bias at Cleveland.com?
Moderator: Jim O'Bryan
-
Bret Callentine
- Posts: 571
- Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 3:18 pm
- Location: Lakewood
Suburban bias at Cleveland.com?
"I met with Bret one on one and found him impossible to deal with." - S.K.
-
Peter Grossetti
- Posts: 1533
- Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2011 10:43 pm
Re: Suburban bias at the Plain Dealer?
Probably because the article is written by a Sun Paper reporter .. and the other folks indicted were not from "Sun communities."
I wouldn't read too much into it.
I wouldn't read too much into it.
"So, let's make the most of this beautiful day.
Since we're together we might as well say:
Would you be mine? Could you be mine?
Won't you be my neighbor?"
~ Fred (Mr. Rogers) Rogers
Since we're together we might as well say:
Would you be mine? Could you be mine?
Won't you be my neighbor?"
~ Fred (Mr. Rogers) Rogers
-
Brian Pedaci
- Posts: 496
- Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 1:17 am
Re: Suburban bias at Cleveland.com?
It was posted to the "Lakewood Community Blog". Here's the same story posted in the Metro section:
http://www.cleveland.com/metro/index.ss ... ed_ag.html
"7 indicted for illegal gambling..."
http://www.cleveland.com/metro/index.ss ... ed_ag.html
"7 indicted for illegal gambling..."