Betsy Voinovich wrote:Well now I've been stuck behind people at Mars and at Manor Park who didn't realize the lights would be gone and who had the notion that they would be turning left-- when I was on Mars yesterday I was late for picking up one of my kids and it was agonizing, so I made a mental note: Never go down that street again, even if I am turning right, because the person in front of me might want to turn left. So that's less traffic there, I guess. More at Arthur. more at Elmwood? At that hour Elmwood is full of cars turning into Grant, so that one's also not going to work. The traffic isn't going to go away. I wonder if when they do the studies they think about the alternate routes that cars will be forced to take, and whether if they eliminate enough signals, cars will be lined up across the train tracks-- stuff like that-- I guess we'll see how it goes.J Hrlec wrote:For me, these changes make Lakewood no less walkable... if anything it encourages me to walk a block more to end up generally in the same area across the street.
I'm more concerned about people getting electrocuted when trying to trigger lights to use existing cross-walks:
Hi J--
Yeah that looks pretty scary. Which intersection is that?
And you're right, pedestrians will all get to do a lot more walking-- as they head to whatever light is available, which might be pleasant when the weather is good and the streets are shoveled, and this has been a good winter for it. I guess by walkable I meant that it was easy to get around the city on foot, efficiently, but more exercise is good. I think the interesting thing to do will be to observer whether pedestrian and car traffic can absorb these changes-- our population is lower than last time our traffic signal situation was evaluated. It will be interesting to see if it makes getting around easier or better.
Betsy Voinovich
The pic is from the cross walk by 5 guys that goes across to Marc's plaza. Haven't been there in the last week so not sure if this was a "temp" problem.
