stephen davis wrote:We sure expect a lot from our Mayors and Councilpersons in this town, as we should, but let’s be realistic.Jim O'Bryan wrote:…I am not sure Lakewood needs a monarchy, where everything is laid out by succession. I like being able to vote for my representatives.
Jim,
Monarchy?
You’re going to have to get over it. You DO get to vote, but sometimes a seat is going to open up. The rules for succession and appointments are spelled out in our citizen created, and voter approved, City Charter.
The Council appointments, that I remember, have worked out fine. Unscientifically, I might suggest that, given the percentages, Council appointees may have better performance records than those initially voted in by the public.
Steve
.
Steve
As always thank you for the pearls of wisdom.
I would say that there is a huge difference between the occasional shuffling and needs
of an appointment now and then, and the long term changes and appointments that are
actually becoming woven into the fabric of this city as the normal process.
Our past two elections have been filled with "it is easier to elect an incumbent, then
step down, and we will put X into that seat."
While you point out, that while unscientific, we end up with higher quality than those elected.
I still prefer that old fashion system of voting, and that person staying on through
the term until then end and then moving on, up or out.
While one can argue that it only makes sense for a public official to plan their successors.
One can equally argue that it does work around the democratic system, especially in
what has quickly become the revolving door of Lakewood politics.
Of course we all know that this county wide shake-up will see many seats vacant, and
leave us with the need to fill many seats with good people quickly.
But then we all know what the bible says about pearls of wisdom.
.