Ed Dickson wrote:So, Bill, what you are saying is that if education exists to avoid the need to tazer this dog in the future, we shouldn't take the opportunity to have that education happen? We should continue "status quo" even though we could better ourselves from something like this?.
I agree. Additional training for police officers in the area of animal behaviour is a good idea. I also think animal owners should be required to attend a training class on the responsiblities of dog ownership before they are allowed to get a dog license. An insurance requirement is also a good idea.
Ed Dickson wrote:It's really a pointless argument with you as I know how much fear clouds judgement and ability to be rational. .
Fear has not clouded my judgement. I happen to like dogs. However, I understand that a dog is a dog is an animal and that you should always be aware of that.
Ed Dickson wrote:I will also challenge you, Bill, to show me the statitics that state "hundreds" of cases exist as you say. That is just factually incorrect. .
Dog attack FATALITIES are increasing. There are an average of 26 FATALITIES per year:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dog_attack
Ed Dickson wrote:Finally, the dog in question was not showing aggressive signals in any way. It has no history of bites or even scratches. I wouldn't expect the officers to know that (I am a sensible person, after all) . .
I agree. I wouldn't expect the officer to know that either. Did the dog attack its owner? Is the dog a stray? Is the dog violent? Is the dog deseased? Will that dog attack? If the dog bolts will it attack or kill that child across the street? In that context the officer acted appropriately and should be commended.
Ed Dickson wrote:Again, I am gathering the educational programs, some of which are free, that exist that will help curb this from happening in the future. I will present them to the proper people and hope the city will take this seriously. .
Hopefully you will agree with me on this one thing: An educational requirement for dog owners.