This deck needs some poetry

Open and general public discussions about things outside of Lakewood.

Moderator: Jim O'Bryan

Mark Moran
Posts: 177
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 7:20 am

This deck needs some poetry

Post by Mark Moran »

Truth By Repetition
by Calvin Trilling

I told them thanks, but no thanks, Palin said.
We'd rather pay for it ourselves instead.

But here's a tape on which you clearly say
You're for the bridge. The federals should pay.

I told them thanks, but no thanks, Palin said.
We'd rather pay for it ourselves instead.

You weren't opposed at all until the day
That Congress made that project DOA.

I told them thanks, but no thanks, Palin said.
We'd rather pay for it ourselves instead.

And then you thought it perfectly OK
For you to take the money anyway.

I told them thanks, but no thanks, Palin said.
We'd rather pay for it ourselves instead.

But... oh, skip it.
Stephen Eisel
Posts: 3281
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:36 pm

Post by Stephen Eisel »

Hate
Hate
Hate
Hate
The United States is full of hate...
Jim DeVito
Posts: 946
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 7:11 am
Location: Lakewood, Ohio

Post by Jim DeVito »

I would not call it hate. I would call it dissalusionment.
ryan costa
Posts: 2486
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 10:31 pm

rough

Post by ryan costa »

http://www.time.com/time/nation/article ... 24,00.html

As if it couldn't support itself, Alaska also ranks No. 1, year after year, in money it sucks in from Washington. In 2005 (the most recent figures), according to the Tax Foundation, Alaska ranked 18th in federal taxes paid per resident ($5,434) but first in federal spending received per resident ($13,950). Its ratio of federal spending received to federal taxes paid ranks third among the 50 states, and in the absolute amount it receives from Washington over and above the amount it sends to Washington, Alaska ranks No. 1.


Her major legislative accomplishment has been to revamp Alaska's windfall-profits tax in order to increase the state's take. Alaska calls it a "clear and equitable share" tax. The state assumes that extracting oil from the tundra costs about $25 per bbl. and takes as much as 75% of the difference between that and the sale price.



Maybe these are good policies for Governor Palin to pursue for Alaska, as Governor of Alaska. If I'm keeping up with the slogans correctly, she would be more honest doing this as a Democrat.

It is ok to hate being lied to by politicians and party leaders. The alaskans are making us pay more for oil: they must hate our Freedom: just like Saddam Hussein?!?
"Is this flummery” — Archie Goodwin
Stephen Eisel
Posts: 3281
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:36 pm

Re: rough

Post by Stephen Eisel »

ryan costa wrote:http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1839724,00.html

As if it couldn't support itself, Alaska also ranks No. 1, year after year, in money it sucks in from Washington. In 2005 (the most recent figures), according to the Tax Foundation, Alaska ranked 18th in federal taxes paid per resident ($5,434) but first in federal spending received per resident ($13,950). Its ratio of federal spending received to federal taxes paid ranks third among the 50 states, and in the absolute amount it receives from Washington over and above the amount it sends to Washington, Alaska ranks No. 1.


Her major legislative accomplishment has been to revamp Alaska's windfall-profits tax in order to increase the state's take. Alaska calls it a "clear and equitable share" tax. The state assumes that extracting oil from the tundra costs about $25 per bbl. and takes as much as 75% of the difference between that and the sale price.



Maybe these are good policies for Governor Palin to pursue for Alaska, as Governor of Alaska. If I'm keeping up with the slogans correctly, she would be more honest doing this as a Democrat.

It is ok to hate being lied to by politicians and party leaders. The alaskans are making us pay more for oil: they must hate our Freedom: just like Saddam Hussein?!?


Liar Liar pants on fire
burned his butt on a telephone wire
who was governor in 2005
all you can do is lie
Stephen Eisel
Posts: 3281
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:36 pm

Post by Stephen Eisel »

Jim DeVito wrote:I would not call it hate. I would call it dissalusionment.



truth
truth
truth
truth
you would not know the truth
even if it bit you in the butt
ryan costa
Posts: 2486
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 10:31 pm

Re: rough

Post by ryan costa »

Stephen Eisel wrote:
ryan costa wrote:http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1839724,00.html

As if it couldn't support itself, Alaska also ranks No. 1, year after year, in money it sucks in from Washington. In 2005 (the most recent figures), according to the Tax Foundation, Alaska ranked 18th in federal taxes paid per resident ($5,434) but first in federal spending received per resident ($13,950). Its ratio of federal spending received to federal taxes paid ranks third among the 50 states, and in the absolute amount it receives from Washington over and above the amount it sends to Washington, Alaska ranks No. 1.


Her major legislative accomplishment has been to revamp Alaska's windfall-profits tax in order to increase the state's take. Alaska calls it a "clear and equitable share" tax. The state assumes that extracting oil from the tundra costs about $25 per bbl. and takes as much as 75% of the difference between that and the sale price.



Maybe these are good policies for Governor Palin to pursue for Alaska, as Governor of Alaska. If I'm keeping up with the slogans correctly, she would be more honest doing this as a Democrat.

It is ok to hate being lied to by politicians and party leaders. The alaskans are making us pay more for oil: they must hate our Freedom: just like Saddam Hussein?!?


Liar Liar pants on fire
burned his butt on a telephone wire
who was governor in 2005
all you can do is lie


The article mentions Governor Palin vetoed approximately 2 percent of Alaska's state budget over four years. the 2005 numbers couldn't have changed that much since then. the ratio of federal taxes paid to federal expenditures received could not have changed that greatly since then. Alaska is a welfare state. it is unpopulated enough and has enough federal money and oil money coming in for folks to enjoy sports, fishing and hunting....therefore they must like small government?

The article mentions Governor Palin did approve increases in the taxes Alaska levies on Oil during her term as Governor Palin of Alaska. That seems pretty significant. it happened before 2005. She did not lower taxes, she increased them.
"Is this flummery” — Archie Goodwin
Stephen Eisel
Posts: 3281
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:36 pm

Re: rough

Post by Stephen Eisel »

ryan costa wrote:
Stephen Eisel wrote:
ryan costa wrote:http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1839724,00.html

As if it couldn't support itself, Alaska also ranks No. 1, year after year, in money it sucks in from Washington. In 2005 (the most recent figures), according to the Tax Foundation, Alaska ranked 18th in federal taxes paid per resident ($5,434) but first in federal spending received per resident ($13,950). Its ratio of federal spending received to federal taxes paid ranks third among the 50 states, and in the absolute amount it receives from Washington over and above the amount it sends to Washington, Alaska ranks No. 1.


Her major legislative accomplishment has been to revamp Alaska's windfall-profits tax in order to increase the state's take. Alaska calls it a "clear and equitable share" tax. The state assumes that extracting oil from the tundra costs about $25 per bbl. and takes as much as 75% of the difference between that and the sale price.



Maybe these are good policies for Governor Palin to pursue for Alaska, as Governor of Alaska. If I'm keeping up with the slogans correctly, she would be more honest doing this as a Democrat.

It is ok to hate being lied to by politicians and party leaders. The alaskans are making us pay more for oil: they must hate our Freedom: just like Saddam Hussein?!?


Liar Liar pants on fire
burned his butt on a telephone wire
who was governor in 2005
all you can do is lie


The article mentions Governor Palin vetoed approximately 2 percent of Alaska's state budget over four years. the 2005 numbers couldn't have changed that much since then. the ratio of federal taxes paid to federal expenditures received could not have changed that greatly since then. Alaska is a welfare state. it is unpopulated enough and has enough federal money and oil money coming in for folks to enjoy sports, fishing and hunting....therefore they must like small government?

The article mentions Governor Palin did approve increases in the taxes Alaska levies on Oil during her term as Governor Palin of Alaska. That seems pretty significant. it happened before 2005. She did not lower taxes, she increased them.
drool drool let us all hop in the hate pool.
Danielle Masters
Posts: 1139
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 12:39 am
Location: Lakewood, OH

Post by Danielle Masters »

I am confused about this hate Stephen, since when is the truth hate?
sharon kinsella
Posts: 1490
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 7:54 am
Contact:

Post by sharon kinsella »

There ya go Dannielle, looking for Stephen to make sense.
"When I dare to be powerful -- to use my strength in the service of my vision, then it becomes less and less important whether I am afraid." - Audre Lorde
Stan Austin
Contributor
Posts: 2465
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 12:02 pm
Contact:

Post by Stan Austin »

:lol: back to the poemm----- I liked the chorus line :D

that is a poetic term, isn't it :?
Brian Pedaci
Posts: 496
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 1:17 am

Post by Brian Pedaci »

Reality has a well-known liberal bias.
Stephen Eisel
Posts: 3281
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:36 pm

Post by Stephen Eisel »

Danielle Masters wrote:I am confused about this hate Stephen, since when is the truth hate?



left eye
right eye
blind eye
Stephen Eisel
Posts: 3281
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:36 pm

Post by Stephen Eisel »

$1billion
more than a million
but less than a zillion
your eye is blind
because your head is stuck in your own behind
dl meckes
Posts: 1475
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 6:29 pm
Location: Lakewood

Post by dl meckes »

Stephen,

I love your spirit and mind. You have been real treat and inspiration for me. I treasure that. You talents and gifts are absolutely wonderful! Your many writings are absolutely fascinating. Of all the people I have met in my entire life, you surely stand out on top. It is incredible how little I knew about all your wonderful work, certainly a life well lived and I hope that you are well rewarded in the next life. Thank you so much for your enlightenment and wisdom. I wish to go on the permanent record on this matter, you are one of a kind.
Post Reply