Colleen Wing wrote:As I have stated before, I find it ironic that the people who claim to be the tolerant, open-minded people seem to spew as much venum as those they claim to hate. Most of the discussion is based in stereotypes and prejudices-on the extreme of both sides.
I just refuse to accept that treating people horribly is somehow acceptible when they are running for office or when they generally disagree with you.
We are "politics". We set the standard. And as Dr. Phil would say-How's that working for ya?
I hope for a heck of a lot better than what we have no matter who wins.
Open minded:
Not narrow or conservative in thought, expression, or conduct: broad, broad-minded, liberal, progressive, tolerant. See attitude/good attitude/bad attitude/neutral attitude, wide/narrow.
This is the definition of open-minded that I subscribe to Open minded does not mean to sit back and not voice opinons of who is going to run your country. It does not mean being pushed to believe in a war that you never believed in. It does not mean not fighting for what you believe in, like sexual education for our children to prevent more abortions and diseases. It does not mean not decrying the appointing to top posts in this country FRIENDS instead of educated and experienced people so that the Katrina catastrophe never happens again. It does not mean the absence of fighting and screaming against a government that seems destined to make sure the rich get richer and the poor get poorer. What "open-minded" means to me, is that I have a rich life of very solid and good friends of ALL races, ALL sexualities, ALL relgions, and yes, some even of different poltical parties. Can you say the same Colleen? When you preach about open=mindedness and try to discredit people for not being tolerant of views that are destroying this country, you have the wrong defintion. How tolerant are you of friends with different beliefs? Actions speak louder than words.