Posts from the Deck for Print?
Moderator: Jim O'Bryan
-
- Posts: 400
- Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 10:32 pm
- Location: Lakewood, Ohio
Posts from the Deck for Print?
Why couldn't posts from the Deck here, be used for the printed version of the LO?
Mark Allan Crnolatas
Mark Allan Crnolatas
-
- Posts: 324
- Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 3:11 pm
I would hope that if that is even a consideration that the orginal authors would have to agree first.
I often write posts stream-of-consciousness style and rarely re-edit them. This is partly due to the limited amount of time that I have and partly because a more formal post can sometimes come across as more aggressive than one that is written more colloquially.
The article I did write for the paper I took the extra time to proof read, edit, and polish to ensure better readability and a more professional tone that I felt would be appropriate for the paper. This is how I would treat anything that I would want printed.
One thing to remember is that on the forum, if I really messed up a post with pathetic grammar or spelling, I can fix it. If I didnt explain myself well and was misunderstood, I can respond again and explain, restate, etc.
The paper does not allow an author to do either - so another danger would be that posts that might be pulled may be taken out of context and actually misrepresent the author.
JMO
Charyn
I often write posts stream-of-consciousness style and rarely re-edit them. This is partly due to the limited amount of time that I have and partly because a more formal post can sometimes come across as more aggressive than one that is written more colloquially.
The article I did write for the paper I took the extra time to proof read, edit, and polish to ensure better readability and a more professional tone that I felt would be appropriate for the paper. This is how I would treat anything that I would want printed.
One thing to remember is that on the forum, if I really messed up a post with pathetic grammar or spelling, I can fix it. If I didnt explain myself well and was misunderstood, I can respond again and explain, restate, etc.
The paper does not allow an author to do either - so another danger would be that posts that might be pulled may be taken out of context and actually misrepresent the author.
JMO
Charyn
-
- Posts: 1475
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 6:29 pm
- Location: Lakewood
-
- Posts: 324
- Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 3:11 pm
-
- Posts: 1475
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 6:29 pm
- Location: Lakewood
-
- Posts: 324
- Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 3:11 pm
-
- Posts: 1475
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 6:29 pm
- Location: Lakewood
Sorry, I don't want to discourage happy thoughts!
I'm pretty sure there are "Rate This Post" mods and we can look at that in the next iteration.
I just think it feels better when somebody actually writes something like "great post!" That seems more personal.
When you have a "rate this post" feature, anyone, including the author, can give their post high marks. When readers actually take the time to PM or write a reply about a post, it's real.
JMO
I'm pretty sure there are "Rate This Post" mods and we can look at that in the next iteration.
I just think it feels better when somebody actually writes something like "great post!" That seems more personal.
When you have a "rate this post" feature, anyone, including the author, can give their post high marks. When readers actually take the time to PM or write a reply about a post, it's real.
JMO
-
- Posts: 324
- Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 3:11 pm