Lakewood HS/City School Disabled Students program

The jumping off discussion area for the rest of the Deck. All things Lakewood.
Please check out our other sections. As we refile many discussions from the past into
their proper sections please check them out and offer suggestions.

Moderator: Jim O'Bryan

Ivor Karabatkovic
Posts: 845
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 9:45 am
Contact:

Lakewood HS/City School Disabled Students program

Post by Ivor Karabatkovic »

Dear Observers,

I'm starting to work on a very interesting piece on the disabled students at Lakewood High School for the Lakewood Times (HS newspaper). I need to get started on researching numbers of funding and test scores and so on... and needed a source where I could dig these things up.

The article is going to be about the NCBL and how it affects the disabled students in our building. It will touch base on the daily life of a student, and how (IMO) they seem to be forgotten about by the student body and the Board. I want it to be a powerful piece, and if anyone has any other suggestions for points to make in this article please do not hesitate to throw in your two cents. I want this article to also point out the good things that the school district, state, and government has done to help schools, students and parents.

Interviews from both sides of the issue would be great too. I want to use my two weeks off from school to get as much research done as possible so I can get right to work on this article once the break is over.

I surfed through the Ohio Dept. of Education website and read the test scores for disabled students, but I don't understand what some of the categories mean.

For example:
Image
"Proficiency Results by Disabled Status (Building)" section has two columns, one labeled "N" and one labeled "Y". What do the N and Y stand for? If anyone can clear that up that would be great. I think the left column represents percentage of the student body, and the left the disabled student percentage? I'm not sure!

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
"Hey Kiddo....this topic is much more important than your football photos, so deal with it." - Mike Deneen
Heidi Hilty
Posts: 197
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2005 8:31 am
Location: Lakewood

Post by Heidi Hilty »

Ivor,
My husband has worked in Special Ed at LHS for several years. He'd be glad to talk to you. Let me know if you're interested.
And Merry Christmas!
Heidi
"from the moment we open our eyes,
there is beauty to behold."
David Anderson
Posts: 400
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 12:41 pm

Post by David Anderson »

Ivor –

While I am not 100 percent sure what “Yâ€Â
Ivor Karabatkovic
Posts: 845
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 9:45 am
Contact:

Post by Ivor Karabatkovic »

[quote]What percentage of Lakewood’s public school student body is classified as “special needs?â€Â
"Hey Kiddo....this topic is much more important than your football photos, so deal with it." - Mike Deneen
Ivor Karabatkovic
Posts: 845
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 9:45 am
Contact:

Post by Ivor Karabatkovic »

Are there other ways to monitor the performance of special needs students besides the Ohio Graduation Test?


yes, students get re-evaluated every three years. so if they pass the evaluation they're let into the general education classrooms. if they fail, they continue their special education IEP (individual education plans)
"Hey Kiddo....this topic is much more important than your football photos, so deal with it." - Mike Deneen
Ivor Karabatkovic
Posts: 845
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 9:45 am
Contact:

Post by Ivor Karabatkovic »

quick question for everyone reading:

how much money do you think is the government spending on education from their budget?

remember, we have several acts promising billions of dollars towards education that have been passed in the past 30 years- put that into account.

any wild guesses?
"Hey Kiddo....this topic is much more important than your football photos, so deal with it." - Mike Deneen
Dan Slife
Posts: 99
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2005 5:58 am
Location: Lakewood, Ohio

Post by Dan Slife »

Ivor,

It's interesting that Lakewood's ratio of disabled students falls between third-ring Bay and inner-core Cleveland, at 14 and 19 percent, respectively.

That may be an interesting line of inquirey for your research.

It may lead to an understanding of the economic dynamics underpinning each family's decisions to locate in this city, as opposed to others with similar proportions of disabled students.

I suggest that the families of disabled students in your building will bring another layer of depth(and soul) to your important, timely analysis.

Good luck with you research. If I can be of assistance, don't hesitate to send me a message.

Best,
Dan
Dan Slife
Ivor Karabatkovic
Posts: 845
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 9:45 am
Contact:

Post by Ivor Karabatkovic »

Dan,

Dr. Kate Foley, who is the head of Student Services and places these special education students into classrooms and programs gave me a few other districts that Lakewood compares to.

Cleveland Heights-University Heights district is at 85.9%, meaning 14.1% of their headcount qualifies as disabled.

North Olmsted High School is at 88.1%, and their student body is very similar to Lakewoods. High headcount and very diverse community. Not as much as Lakewood, but similar.

Bedford is another city that's very close. 86.4%. meaning 13.6% is disabled some way.

It was amazing to sit down with Dr.Foley and listen to her speak about issues concerning NCLB and funding, some of the statistics are so shocking that it had the Times editors going "wait, really?"

I'm getting all these percentages from the Ohio Dept. of Education website, my article is done as far as research is concerned. I cranked out four pages today in about 5 hours of sitting in front of the computer and going through pages and pages of interviews, pamphlets and quotes that I've gotten over the past two days. All I need is an interview from a teacher and I'll be set.

What started out as an article that was going to depict the daily life of a Special Ed teacher and student, but it turned into something more. The numbers are too shocking to leave out, so I had to include them with my other material.

I've learned a ton in the past two days, and I hope the readers will learn something new too. And yet, there's so much to this field and subject that I only know a little fraction. It goes to show how ignorant students and society as a whole is when it comes to special education. As Dr.Foley said, it's not a place, its a service. Education is the place, I think.
"Hey Kiddo....this topic is much more important than your football photos, so deal with it." - Mike Deneen
Kenneth Warren
Posts: 489
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2005 7:17 pm

Post by Kenneth Warren »

Ivor:

I want to supply several critical checkpoints for your inquiry:


1. Are policies for disabled learners the same or different in each district?

2. Are diagnostic tools to identify disabled learners the same or different in each district?

3. Are the levels of public support for disabled learners the same or different in each district?

4. Are the program benefits/payoffs for disabled learners the same or different in each district?

5. Are methods to detect exaggerations in learning disorders the same or different in each district?

6. Does limited income and resources restrict parents of children with learning disorders from moving to more affluent districts? (I would suspect that a range of economic and social factors might be correlated to learning disorders.)

I look forward to reading your report.

Kenneth Warren
Ivor Karabatkovic
Posts: 845
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 9:45 am
Contact:

Post by Ivor Karabatkovic »

5. Are methods to detect exaggerations in learning disorders the same or different in each district?

I can answer this one off the top of my head.

This year is Dr. Kate Foley's first year working as the Head of Student Services. She was brought in because Lakewood was suspected of being lenient on their classification of student disabilities. The Federal Government thought that Lakewood didn't really have as many kids with disabilities as "advertised" or reported. So yeah, methods are different. But Lakewood is part of a first-ring group made up of several districts and they try to figure out ways to best supply students needs. The districts that I can think off off the top of my head are Lakewood, Cleveland Heights-University Heights, Bedford, North Olmsted, Rocky River (?), and that's all I remember.

What kind of policies are you asking about? The government has given every district a point A and B. At the end of every year, every student that started at point A must be at point B or the district is failing.

I'd imagine the public support of these programs is far less than here in Lakewood. This program is a strong point of our community. Families move here for the program (and cost of living, etc) and if Lakewood as a community don't know too much about the great work being done, then I'm positive other communities don't support their programs any different.
just my opinion, though.

Program benefits/payoffs? Every district has one goal, that's to get these students to fit into society and to contribute to society as much as possible. They provide public housing and stick with these students from the day they step into pre-school until they are 21 years of age. Students then either live with their parents and work, or they live in public housing. The sad thing is that parents of these students pass away, as do all parents. Then the students have no one to care for them, and that becomes a problem. Lakewood City Schools works with parents/guardians as early as middle school to get them on a list for group housing where these individuals get taken care of and can live. The waiting period to get one of these group housing appartments is about 10 years, sometimes more. It's heartbreaking.

Lakewood used to bring kids from Rocky River and other neighboring districts to Lakewood for schooling. I think they stopped that due to budget cuts and lack of funding. I remember clearly in middle school at HMMS having hearing impaired students from Rocky River in my science class.

I've been lucky enough to watch the development of a friend of mine that's hearing impaired. He's been a classmate of mine since 6th grade. I've watched him go from the back of a classroom to a excellent artist and great student. He gives speeches in front of classes, which some of the general education students aren't comfortable doing.

The teachers and students are truly remarkable and fascinating. Always smiling and never complaining.
"Hey Kiddo....this topic is much more important than your football photos, so deal with it." - Mike Deneen
Kenneth Warren
Posts: 489
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2005 7:17 pm

Post by Kenneth Warren »

By policy, I suggest asking about any special policy protections, rights or rules a district extends to disabled students that may vary from town to town.

I am most interested in the disciplinary challenges to the administration of the public learning environment that can stem from disability caused disruptions and misconduct.

The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) includes such disabilities as: mental retardation, hearing impairments, speech and language impairments, visual impairments, emotional disturbance, orthopedic impairments, autism, traumatic brain injury, specific learning disabilities, multiple disabilities, developmental delay.

Ammendments to IDEA push the mainstreaming of special education students, impose limits on a school's ability to remove disabled students from the classroom, when misconduct stems from the disability.

I'd be interested in seeing comparisons in suspension and expulsion rates, because "disabled students protected by IDEA and other such laws are seldom suspended or expelled from public schools" (see p. 84, Targeting in Social Programs: Avoiding Bad Bets, Removing Bad Apples by Peter H. Schuck and Richard J. Zeckhauser).

As Schuck and Zeckhauser suggest, Individuals with Disabilities Education Act offers shelter for the disabled from the general disciplinary protocals extended to mainstream students.

That creates a disadvantage to the learning environment.

Kenneth Warren
Ivor Karabatkovic
Posts: 845
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 9:45 am
Contact:

Post by Ivor Karabatkovic »

Mr.Warren,

you do bring up a great point. Never once did expulsion come up. Students just drop out when they get to high school. Junior High School is when behaviorial issues start to come up, and students figure out by high school that if they throw tantrums, they don't have to take "these tests again". Some students get so worried and anxious that they get really sick and miss the tests. So the students have figured out escape mechanisms to get out of testing, or class.

And that to me is a key point. No matter how bad the tantrums are, the school, teachers and parents find alternatives so that the child can still get his/her promised education. I don't think there is one child out there that cannot get his or her education, unless they don't want it.
"Hey Kiddo....this topic is much more important than your football photos, so deal with it." - Mike Deneen
Gary Rice
Posts: 1651
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 9:59 pm
Location: Lakewood

Special Education

Post by Gary Rice »

Hello Ivor,

As a person born with speech, hearing, and orthopedic difficulties, I also went through the Lakewood School District. Additionally, I am a recently retired Special Education teacher with another district. Therefore, I have some strong opinions regarding your posting.

First, a few brief observations. I commend your exploration of this sensitive topic. There are many aspects to this issue. One that you might want to be aware of is the use of the word "disability". Of growing popularity would be the terms "differences" or "challenged".

You might want to review my recent column in the Observer: "No Child Left Behind-Or Else!" You can see it HERE:

http://www.lakewoodobserver.com/pdfs/Ob ... e%2018.pdf

A few years ago, the No Child Left Behind law was passed. On its face, it sounded like a good idea to many folks. The strenuous testing regimen mandated by state and federal regulations, permitted only a very small percentage of the district's special needs students to be excused from regular testing, and to therefore receive an alternate assessment. The alternate assessments are very involved, time consuming, and complex. (In my opinion, they are far too involved and onerous) Special educators are struggling with these regulations and assessments. Special needs students also struggle with the higher and higher pressures and expectations that the politicians have placed upon them. In my opinion, old protections and rules have been trampled on, as more and more children are being expected to jump through the same hoops.

Subjects like Home Skills, Music and the arts are not included in the academic testing, upon which school ratings depend. Second language students new to the country also can reduce the district test score, and therefore, district ratings as well. It is, in my opinion, a horrible pressure for students, parents ,teachers, and districts, to simply improve test scores without having an effective mechanism to address the all too real human costs of this impersonal quantitative-only ratings system.

And the children suffer for it. Some might not be ready to achieve at the speed of their peers. Their self-esteem takes a nose-dive, as does their self-concept, and as always, society pays the price later.

All children can learn, but to expect that all will learn the same thing by a certain date? Or to all be equally proficient in all subjects by a certain grade level? Do you think that is a realistic concept?

And what indeed, shall we do with those who do not succeed?

In my opinion, great and lasting damage is being done in American schools these days to thousands of wonderful children who are in some way, different from their peers. We need greater acceptance of the diversity that we have. We need to recognize that diversity as a gift, rather than a potential liability. A few days ago. our state legislators have again voted to increase high school requirements, raising the bar yet higher for most state college admissions.

Can all of our children achieve these challenges? Could you? Like all students, I had subjects I was better in, than others. I also had subject that took me longer than some to learn.

I would not want to be a student today. I do not know how they are able to cope with these pressures.

Fortunately, there are many great teachers and administrators with the Lakewood schools, who can help. They also can give you a good idea of the daily challenges that they face.

Be sure that you get appropriate permission for your interviews, as schools have their procedures, as well.

As a final precaution for your article, I would suggest that you not use Special Education student names, as confidentiality laws would be involved.
Ivor Karabatkovic
Posts: 845
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 9:45 am
Contact:

Post by Ivor Karabatkovic »

Mr.Rice,

I appreciate your points and tips very much. It is a very very touchy subject to be reporting on, and I will do everything I can do to make this a good article. I thank you for pointing out the confidentiality issue as well because that's something I probably would've looked over.

The passing of the NCLB and making changes to the IDIEA Acts has made it even tougher for special education programs around the country, especially here in Ohio. The passing of the CORE academics act which like you said, raises the high school requirements, also isn't fair.

Every student has their strengths and weaknesses. I passed the OGT tests with flying colors, along with many other tests in the past. For the fourth year in a row, I cannot pass the writing section of a ESL test that the government still makes me take.

The government's idea of turning our students into cookie cutters is absurd and goes against everything we know about human development.

I would like to get one more interview of a teacher in.

Mr.Rice, were you a student at LHS?
did the special education students do garbage duty in the cafeterias during lunch periods every day? I'm trying to find out where this started, and why, and why it still goes on.
"Hey Kiddo....this topic is much more important than your football photos, so deal with it." - Mike Deneen
Ivor Karabatkovic
Posts: 845
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 9:45 am
Contact:

Post by Ivor Karabatkovic »

I have realized that the board has not forgotten about its students. After interviewing the superintendent and the head of student services I have learned just how much is being done for ALL students.

According to the list that I have printed out of the number of students for every "disability" at every school in Lakewood, Ohio- there's 150 students at Lakewood High School that fall under at least one of those categories.

We have over 2,000 students at LHS. Yet we only notice not more than 10 of those students. That says something about the student body. The only students we see are the ones that are picking up students garbage and cleaning out the recycle bins in every classroom. There is a common image when someone says "special education" that I'm trying to prove wrong here. Like you said, it's not just jimmy in the wheelchair, it's the A+ student with a 10.8 GPA sitting next to you too. I want our students to learn more about the daily lives of these students, so that ignorance is watered down. I can't eliminate other peoples prejudices and ignorance to topics, but I can at least inform them with new information that might change their views for the better.

We at the Lakewood High School Times follow every journalistic ethic there is in the book. We win national awards yearly, and have been going strong for over 80 years. We wouldn't publish something that would break any laws, ethics, moral issues, etc. The Lakewood Times is a open forum newspaper/magazine, but we still have an advisor and a panel of 6 editors that are educated in journalism, from legal cases to ethics to how to write a good article and take a good photo. Everyone who has power in the Lakewood Times has had a year long course/class of writing and studying and test taking that makes this paper win the awards that it wins.

As you write a story, you begin with a simple outline and a few ideas. Those ideas change as you get interviews, collect data and quotes, and as you write your piece. In the 2000+ words that I already have written down, I have not said one bad thing about how the Board of Education treats any of its students. I have continuously praised the Board and will continue to do so because they deserve it. My outline has changed, and some things I talked about in my opening post, I don't even think about including in the article. Like the students being forgotten by the board. The student body yes, but not the board. Take it from a LHS senior that has seen this for the past four years, that has heard students talk in classrooms and cafeterias, and that has been in the loop.

When writing an article, you will always get people that disagree. That's why I take photos, you can't disagree with photos. I have done over six hours of in depth research for numbers, laws, and procedures in the special education departments here and around Cleveland. This is on my winter vacation. I have stayed up until 3AM almost every night, actually doing research and reading. I kid you not.

What I've seen is that no one is all right and no one is all wrong on this.


I will publish the article in the Lakewood Times. I might be all right, and I might be all wrong, but I have credible sources and journalistic ethics that will make this article informative. That's all I mean by "powerful piece", it has to be very informative.

I throw in facts like only 1.5% of the federal budget is used toward funding education, when voters who were asked in a poll thought 20% is being used and 37% should be used for funding education in this country. Students don't know that. And that affects the gifted, the general education and the special education classes. Special Education isn't a place in the building, its part of the building. It's just a service. Education is the place, we're all here to get the education we deserve under the same big roof.

The law doesn't allow it.

The same law that has only payed for 17% of the education programs when it promised 50%, leaving its tax payers to come up with over 50% of the 83% left to pay for every year?? the same law that says no matter what the individual case of the student is, (gifted, general education, i'm bad at writing but great at art, dyslexic, ADHD, SBH, Cognitive, Hearing, Vision, and so on) they all need to be at THIS exact point after every school year, and have to be proficient in reading, writing, and math in order to graduate? The same law that now is ordering high schools to increase the graduation requirements for all students? the same law that made congress promise $42 billion towards education this year, but they only gave education $23 billion in this years budget? the same law that costs the state of Ohio 1.447 BILLION dollars on top of what it already costs us to keep these programs running annually?

Are you SURE the law doesn't allow it?

This is where my outline of the article changed drastically. It's not the Board that forgot about its students... it's the government. And while only 1.5% of the budget goes towards K-12 education, they keep implementing new laws that cost the state and local districts more and more to have in place.
"Hey Kiddo....this topic is much more important than your football photos, so deal with it." - Mike Deneen
Post Reply