I've been wrong before, although I'm not sure that I'm seeing anything in my post above that could be interpreted as such.
That point made,,,just a few constructive thoughts here.
I think it would be probably safe to assume that we are all fairly sure about how you feel towards the Mayor, (smile) but putting that aside for a moment, I think there is a larger issue.
As you, and many Lakewoodites are aware, I've written probably close to two hundred columns about our city in the Lakewood Observer paper over the years. Like you, I've seen many sides of Lakewood and again, like you, I've seen a good number of issues that I've felt needed improving. Indeed, I often addressed those in my columns and here on the 'Deck. Still, there were probably a dozen or so columns that I either did not finish, or that I thought would do more harm than good to our city. No one told me not to publish those, and no one tried to twist my arm when I discussed those topics with others. I just felt that they might end up hurting all of us; that is, Lakewood's public image. I was always reluctant to cross that line, and I suppose that when I consider this trash stuff, that sort of question comes to my mind.
Are we only hurting ourselves, our property values, our city's reputation, and our relations towards each other when we bring stuff like this up? I always wondered about whether the end justified the means before I published a controversial column, and trust me, I'm trying not to judge this thread either. (and I know that you did not even start this particular thread!) I am however, watching and wondering at what the long-term fallout of all this might be for the city as a whole.
Not that we ever want to sweep issues under the rug or out to the tree lawn either.
Back to the banjo...