Further, any records that Butler refuses to release by claiming that they are "privileged," or records that he has redacted for the same reason, must be indexed and presented to the court along with the justification for claiming they are privileged. Further, actual copies of these "privileged" records must be filed with the court, under seal, which I presume would be to allow the court to judge whether they were withheld legitimately.By May 1, 2017, Lakewood shall comply with Essi¿s requests by preparing and releasing an ¿Index of Records Supplied, Supplied with Redactions, or Withheld¿ along with the appropriate records to Essi and filing a copy of the Index with the court. The Index shall specify by record request each and all records released, released with redactions, or withheld.
Lastly, Lakewood must prove that they actually attempted to locate the records that Essi requested.The Index shall specify by record request each and all records released, released with redactions, or withheld..... Lakewood shall also submit under seal five copies of each of the disputed records as well as four copies of records which indicate partial redactions.
Lakewood shall also certify the steps it undertook to locate the requested records and that they have either released or submitted under seal all records it could find coming within Essi¿s request
Yet another WIN for truth and justice in Lakewood!
The court preserved the First Amendment rights of Lakewood citizens, now it is championing our right to access public records.
WIN! WIN!