Executive Session

The jumping off discussion area for the rest of the Deck. All things Lakewood.
Please check out our other sections. As we refile many discussions from the past into
their proper sections please check them out and offer suggestions.

Moderator: Jim O'Bryan

mjkuhns
Posts: 608
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2016 8:43 am
Contact:

Executive Session

Post by mjkuhns »

I often find that "coming up for air," and visiting the world beyond our nano-republic of Lakewood, can provide useful perspective.

To suggest a topical example, running a search on "city council executive session" or some similar words might be useful in evaluating local arguments around open meetings, what should be perceived as normal, who if anyone is acting unreasonably, etc.

Some of the things one might find include:

Many examples of executive session provoking controversy.
Homer, AK: http://homernews.com/homer-news/local-n ... ve-session
Seward, AK: http://sewardcitynews.com/2016/03/city- ... e-session/
Springfield, MA: http://www.masslive.com/news/index.ssf/ ... execu.html

Frank reporting of an executive session as "illegal," based on simple reading of the law, as in this story from Sandy Oaks, TX: "City Council Convenes In Illegal Executive Session" http://sandyoaksnews.com/city-council-c ... e-session/
A Leesville, LA article was somewhat more cautious, but still notified the public that "Council's executive session possibly against state law." http://www.leesvilledailyleader.com/art ... /150529703

Cities which do not even permit executive session. In 2015 Houston, TX was considering whether or not to end its complete prohibition on executive session. http://www.chron.com/news/politics/hous ... 015436.php

There are also plenty of examples of rules around executive session. Most jurisdictions permit similar pretexts, e.g. real estate transactions and legal consultation, but in many cases these are accompanied by stern restrictions. Our state, by contrast, appears to take the position that "In Ohio, no state or local government official has the authority to enforce the Open Meetings Act." Multiple documents indicate that the formally prescribed remedy is… pursue a complaint in court. (See e.g. page 98 of https://ohioauditor.gov/publications/13 ... Manual.pdf)

Perhaps some of this will be of service in deciding what actually constitutes customary and appropriate handling of these issues. This is, meanwhile, extremely quick work; if anyone feels like performing further research I hope that he or she will share its results as well.
:: matt kuhns ::
cameron karslake
Posts: 646
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2015 8:35 am

Re: Executive Session

Post by cameron karslake »

Nice research Matt, thank you.

Also, "nano-republic" of Lakewood? I love it!

So appropriate.
mjkuhns
Posts: 608
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2016 8:43 am
Contact:

Re: Executive Session

Post by mjkuhns »

For any who may not be familiar with it, I recommend the novel assessment of James L Petigru about the state of South Carolina:

"…too small for a republic and too large for a lunatic asylum!"
http://clevelandcivilwarroundtable.com/ ... iable4.htm

:wink:
:: matt kuhns ::
cmager
Posts: 697
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 8:33 am

Re: Executive Session

Post by cmager »

cameron karslake wrote:Nice research Matt, thank you. Also, "nano-republic" of Lakewood? I love it! So appropriate.
Word of the Day: nano-republic
Marguerite Harkness
Posts: 293
Joined: Thu May 14, 2015 10:42 am

Re: Executive Session

Post by Marguerite Harkness »

Cleveland Civil War Round Table meeting is tonight (Wed 2/8).
Post Reply