Tom Bullock Says Issue 64 is anti Gay.

The jumping off discussion area for the rest of the Deck. All things Lakewood.
Please check out our other sections. As we refile many discussions from the past into
their proper sections please check them out and offer suggestions.

Moderator: Jim O'Bryan

Bill Call
Posts: 3319
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 1:10 pm

Tom Bullock Says Issue 64 is anti Gay.

Post by Bill Call »

What won't they think of next?
Matthew Lee
Posts: 533
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:15 am

Re: Tom Bullock Says Issue 64 is anti Gay.

Post by Matthew Lee »

Hi Bill,

Could you please post a link? If you are going to post something this inflammatory, it would help to be able to read the actual post in context rather than guessing. Thanks!
Kate McCarthy
Posts: 481
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 1:25 pm
Location: Lakewood

Re: Tom Bullock Says Issue 64 is anti Gay.

Post by Kate McCarthy »

Brian Essi
Posts: 2421
Joined: Thu May 07, 2015 11:46 am

Re: Tom Bullock Says Issue 64 is anti Gay.

Post by Brian Essi »

Bullock is shameless and is playing a HOAX on the LGBT community.

The Master Agreement gave lip service to the LGBT health center features---there is nothing specific--there is nothing legally enforceable.

After 12 months of ignoring the LGBT "features" of the Master Agreement, Bullock and the Insiders Club this weekend claim that's a reason to vote "For 64."

If they cared so much about the LGBT community, why didn't the Insiders PAC put that on their campaign literature?

It's another hoax that the LGBT community should see right through.
David Anderson has no legitimate answers
Matthew Lee
Posts: 533
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:15 am

Re: Tom Bullock Says Issue 64 is anti Gay.

Post by Matthew Lee »

Hi Kate, thank you very much for the link. Appreciate it.
Matthew Lee
Posts: 533
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:15 am

Re: Tom Bullock Says Issue 64 is anti Gay.

Post by Matthew Lee »

Brian Essi wrote:Bullock is shameless and is playing a HOAX on the LGBT community.

The Master Agreement gave lip service to the LGBT health center features---there is nothing specific--there is nothing legally enforceable.

After 12 months of ignoring the LGBT "features" of the Master Agreement, Bullock and the Insiders Club this weekend claim that's a reason to vote "For 64."

If they cared so much about the LGBT community, why didn't the Insiders PAC put that on their campaign literature?

It's another hoax that the LGBT community should see right through.
Hi Brian, that is, indeed, an odd link to what is going on. Appreciate your thoughts on this. Cheers,

Matt
Michael Deneen
Posts: 2133
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 4:10 pm

Re: Tom Bullock Says Issue 64 is anti Gay.

Post by Michael Deneen »

A cynical attempt to pit the gay community against the poor and elderly.
Not a surprise.....as I've said before, Bullock is the most dishonest politician I've met during my 25 years of community activity.
T Peppard
Posts: 119
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2015 12:49 am

Re: Tom Bullock Says Issue 64 is anti Gay.

Post by T Peppard »

Bill Call wrote:What won't they think of next?
I thought the same thing when I saw that article. They are really reaching... talk about sheer desparation. :roll: There is absolutely nothing positive or LGBT friendly about issue 64.
Michael Deneen wrote:A cynical attempt to pit the gay community against the poor and elderly.
Not a surprise.....as I've said before, Bullock is the most dishonest politician I've met during my 25 years of community activity.
....well stated, Mike.
mjkuhns
Posts: 608
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2016 8:43 am
Contact:

Re: Tom Bullock Says Issue 64 is anti Gay.

Post by mjkuhns »

Stay classy*, For 64 campaign.

* Yes, that's sarcasm.
:: matt kuhns ::
Amy Martin
Posts: 549
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2014 9:30 am

Re: Tom Bullock Says Issue 64 is anti Gay.

Post by Amy Martin »

Bullock needs to give us gays more credit. We are not gullible as he apparently believes.
Brian Essi
Posts: 2421
Joined: Thu May 07, 2015 11:46 am

Re: Tom Bullock Says Issue 64 is anti Gay.

Post by Brian Essi »

Throughout all of 2015-2016, we've heard on numerous occasions at press conferences and public forums from CCF's:
1. Dr. Toby Cosgrove
2. Dr. Brian Donely
3. Dr. Stephen Jones
4. Dr. Judith Welsch
5. Shannon Ritchie
6. Ankit Chaabra
7. Tom Gable
8. Bill Gorton
9. Numerous captive LHA trustees, etc.

No once did even one of them mention the LGBT features of the "new sate of the art specialty referral center" designed to divert the "premium payer mix" out of Lakewood.

Now CCF's captive stooge, Tom Bullock, plays that "card."

Hmmm
David Anderson has no legitimate answers
Bridget Conant
Posts: 2896
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 4:22 pm

Re: Tom Bullock Says Issue 64 is anti Gay.

Post by Bridget Conant »

Amy Martin wrote:Bullock needs to give us gays more credit. We are not gullible as he apparently believes.

It's called PANDERING.
Lori Allen _
Posts: 2550
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2015 2:37 pm

Re: Tom Bullock Says Issue 64 is anti Gay.

Post by Lori Allen _ »

Pathetic. I suspect Nickie Antonio is out there spreading this nonsense for Summers & Co. as well. After all, she is siding with Summers & Co. now, right?
cameron karslake
Posts: 646
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2015 8:35 am

Re: Tom Bullock Says Issue 64 is anti Gay.

Post by cameron karslake »

Lori Allen _ wrote:Pathetic. I suspect Nickie Antonio is out there spreading this nonsense for Summers & Co. as well. After all, she is siding with Summers & Co. now, right?
That's correct, the turncoat knows no shame.

Shame on her.
Bill Call
Posts: 3319
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 1:10 pm

Re: Tom Bullock Says Issue 64 is anti Gay.

Post by Bill Call »

Matthew Lee wrote:Hi Bill,

Could you please post a link? If you are going to post something this inflammatory, it would help to be able to read the actual post in context rather than guessing. Thanks!
Sometimes I wait just to see if there is any interest. I also waited to see if anyone else had seen the Patch article.

The addition of the LGBT clinic was an after thought added at the last minute by the Cleveland Clinic. It is more a political and campaign gimmick that anything else.

Bullock has made an odd accusation.

So... Lakewood loses a hospital, access to health care, 1,500 jobs, tens of millions in cash and investments and hundreds of millions in economic activity and if you think the City made a bad deal then Tom Bullock says you must hate gay people. Is this the best they can do? Maybe it will work. We will find out tomorrow.

One of the things I find interesting is that the City and the Clinic haven't spent any time at all bragging about all of the new services that will be offered in the new medical office building. Is it because there is nothing to brag about?
Post Reply