Court Filing: FitzGerald/Summers Plotted Hospital Closing in 2010 to “Feather Political Nests”-Butler Key Player in Plot

[Brian Essi]

An internal CCF document revealed in the Court filing shows that CCF knew it was legally liable under the 1996 Agreements to cover capital improvements and operating losses through 2026 and that that liability was estimated at 279.5M. This one document completely undermines Kevin Butler’s erroneous and fraudulent legal “opinion” claiming that CCF was not contractually liable for the losses. WOW!

10 5 2106 Taxpayer Motion to Compel.pdf

It is really interesting that we have heard nothing from anyone at City Hall about this court filing and its implications.

There has been no denial of any of the facts.

Hmmm.

[Brian Essi]

I overlooked the criminal allegations contained in this court filing.

I'm surprised Mr. Rossen didn't pick up on that.

[Bridget Conant]

And as usual, this thread now appears in court documents.

In response to the Motion to Compel Brian linked to, CCF and Delos Cosgrove's attorneys filed a response that points to this thread as "proof" that the motion to compel was meant to be used for "political posturing."

I have never in my life seen so many court filings and motions that link to and copy threads from a public discussion forum.

Obviously, the Lakewood Observer scares a lot of people. It allows everyone to speak about city issues and bring forward documents that might otherwise be kept out of the public eye. I suppose when you want to hide things from people, that freedom to speak can be frightening.

Again, court documents are PUBLIC RECORDS.

Why is it that the people in charge don't want you to see certain things and don't want you to talk about it, either?

Why are attorneys, who should understand the law, pointing to public discussion forums and claiming that free speech is a bad thing?

Something is rotten in Lakewood.

[Brian Essi]

And as usual, this thread now appears in court documents.

In response to the Motion to Compel Brian linked to, CCF and Delos Cosgrove's attorneys filed a response that points to this thread as "proof" that the motion to compel was meant to be used for "political posturing."

I have never in my life seen so many court filings and motions that link to and copy threads from a public discussion forum.

Obviously, the Lakewood Observer scares a lot of people. It allows everyone to speak about city issues and bring forward documents that might otherwise be kept out of the public eye. I suppose when you want to hide things from people, that freedom to speak can be frightening.

Again, court documents are PUBLIC RECORDS.

Why is it that the people in charge don't want you to see certain things and don't want you to talk about it, either?

Why are attorneys, who should understand the law, pointing to public discussion forums and claiming that free speech is a bad thing?

Something is rotten in Lakewood.

CCF's chief legal counsel admitted to me that he reads the Deck--they can't get around my facts.

[Bridget Conant]

Brian

EVERYONE reads the Deck. In and out of Lakewood.

As much as they like to deny it, all the haters read the deck. All the attorneys read the Deck. CCF people read the Deck.

It's the great equalizer. That's why they fear it so.

[Corey Rossen]

It sounds like the Deck is providing opposing attorneys with great material to use against you. Keep it up, you're doing great!

Public forum, right. Keep it up, the material is boundless.

[Bridget Conant]

Like all the rest, Corey has NO idea of how the First Anendment protects your right to speak out against government and corruption.

But keep on with YOUR rants, Corey. You're really moving your name up there on Google.

[Brian Essi]

Deliberate Sabotage

Messrs. Austin and Kindt,

Please note the three documents below from separate releases by the City (and CCF under court Order in the Taxpayer Lawsuit) .

The first document was released in 2015 via the City Website and the Summers/Subsidium dog and pony forums in 2015--It suggests, that after Summers spent a years studying the problem and spent $750K Subsidium's fees doing so, they somehow did not know (in 2015) that the Clinic was liable under the 1996 Agreements for $158M-$214M of projected losses (caused by the Clinic's own conduct).

The second second was released in August 2017 (after a Court Order) and clearly shows that Summers and Subsidium not only believed the Clinic was liable for the same projected losses ($150M-$200M), but they built their negotiating strategy upon that liability.

The third document is an internal CCF document revealed in the Court filing shows that CCF knew it was legally liable under the 1996 Agreements to cover capital improvements and operating losses through 2026 and that that liability was estimated at 279.5M. This one document completely undermines Kevin Butler’s erroneous and fraudulent legal “opinion” claiming that CCF was not contractually liable for the losses.

Doesn't the evidence suggest that Summers, Subsidium, and CCF's Tom Gable and Brian Donnelly (who all spoke at the coordinated forum where the first document was presented all engaged in more than deliberate sabotage---didn't they proactively mislead the public in 2015 by suggesting there was ambiguity about the Clinic losses that they knew was false?

See also http://lakewoodobserver.com/forum/posti ... 7&p=170945

Slide below is from city Website since 2015:

scan0321.jpg (341.23 KiB) Viewed 2037 times

Page below was produced August 16, 2017 under Court Order

scan0322.jpg (415.65 KiB) Viewed 2037 times