Is The City’s Community Bulletin, Issue No. 5 Misleading?

The jumping off discussion area for the rest of the Deck. All things Lakewood.
Please check out our other sections. As we refile many discussions from the past into
their proper sections please check them out and offer suggestions.

Moderator: Jim O'Bryan

Bill Call
Posts: 3319
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 1:10 pm

Is The City’s Community Bulletin, Issue No. 5 Misleading?

Post by Bill Call »

I am going to submit a version of this for publication:

Citizens of Lakewood have received Community Bulletins in their water bills that contain information about the new Master Agreement between the City and the Cleveland Clinic. Is that information accurate?

Let’s examine the statements made in Issue No. 5.

The following is the relevant content of Issue No. 5 followed by my comments.

CITY OF LAKEWOOD…will receive

• $19.7 million in cash, including $7 million in rehab demo fund, $8.2 million for sale of Columbia Rd facility, $2.88 million in lease payments through June 2018 and $1.7 million in land sale to Cleveland Clinic.

My response:

The Clinic has agreed to pay $7 million in rehab/demo funds, however, the Clinic will only pay if the CITY EXPENDS 100% OF ALL OF THE HOSPITALS $84 MILLION IN CASH AND INVESTMENTS. Since the City anticipates having money left over to fund a new Foundation then the City must also anticipate that the Clinic WILL NOT pay the $7 million.

The City will receive $8.2 million for Columbia Road over a number of years. However, the property was appraised at nearly $15 million and the City had an offer from another interested party for a lot more than $8.2 million. The Columbia Road facility was also home to a business that once generated substantial profits for the Hospital. Why did the City give the Clinic such a sweet deal?

The City will receive $2.88 million in lease payments. However, the Master Agreement states that the lease payments are considered WIND DOWN COSTS and that all wind down costs will be paid by the LHA. Since ALL of LHA assets are City assets the City will pay itself the $2.88 million in lease payments.

• Between $40 million and $80 million in potential development at the former Hospital site.

My response:

Well, I am a little suspicious of an estimate of $40 to $80 million. That’s a big range. The City has been planning the Hospitals closure for 5 years and they still have no plans for the Hospital site. The City has agreed to preserve the Curtis Building and to give the Clinic the use of the current ER parking lot. The land that is left will be shoe horned between the Hospital façade to the North and the parking lot to the South. How much development will actually take place in the little space that is left?

• Full ownership of the Community Health Center on Belle, nine rental homes, the Curtis Block and ownership of the Hospital site.

My response:

The City already owns all of those things. This is worth repeating. The LHA was just the tenant.

The 1996 Lease and Definitive Agreement were quite clear:
ALL OF THE ASSETS OF ANY KIND INCLUDING CASH, INVESTMENTS, BUILDINGS, IMPROVEMENTS, EQUIPMENT, LICENSES AND EVERTHING ELSE WERE TO BE RETURNED TO THE CITY AT THE END OF THE LEASE TERM.

The original agreement also required the LHA and Clinic to return the Hospital in substantially the same condition as an ongoing concern. Did they do that?

LAKEWOOD HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION

• Is contributing $24.2 million toward the community wellness foundation… and $7 million toward rehab and demolition and $8.2 million for the sale of Columbia Road.

My response:

The LHA is contributing nothing. All of the assets of the Hospital belong to the City. LHA is just the tenant.

CLEVELAND CLINIC

• Will invest $36 million of its own money for the development of the land and building at the southwest corner of Belle and Detroit for a 3 story 62,000 square foot medical office building will a full service emergency department.

My response:

That’s partially true. The dollar value in the Master Agreement is $34 million.

However, the new building will be about 33% smaller than the current office building at that site. One floor will house the Clinics Family Residency program, the second floor will house the LGBT Clinic and the first floor will house the emergency department, lab, pharmacy and medical offices.

The City will have to pay for the demolition of the current parking garage and the City will have to pay $2.5 million to build a new parking facility for the Clinic.

• The Clinic is contributing $8 million to the new community wellness foundation, assuming $7 million in transition costs and paying $2.88 million in lease payments.

My response:

The Clinic owes at least $10 million in lease payments.

The Clinic will not pay $7 million in transition costs unless 100% of the Hospitals assets are depleted.

Since the lease payments are considered wind down costs the $2.88 million will be paid for by the City and NOT by the Clinic

What they are not telling you:

“All of LHA’s property of every nature and description, and any and all personal property, equipment and fixtures at the Hospital, shall be transferred to the Clinic.” WITHOUT COMPENSATION TO THE CITY.

AND

The agreement includes a restrictive covenant on the current Hospital Site and that no Care System Provider will be permitted to operate or manage health care on that site. We already know that the Mayor and the Clinic worked to exclude other health care providers from the process. Now we know that they also want to prohibit other health providers from operating in the City.

AND

According to the Master agreement the Hospital had profit of nearly $6 million in 2014.

FINAL THOUGHTS

One of the items not included in the transfer of assets is the City’s beneficial interest in the Lakewood Hospital Foundation. The assets had a value of $33.5 million at the end of 2014. The Lakewood Hospital Foundation has been repurposed to support healthcare and development throughout Northeast Ohio.

At 12/31/2014 the Hospital had cash and long term investments of $84 million. That does not include the value of real estate, equipment, fixtures and licenses valued at $42 million and the City’s beneficial interest in the Lakewood Hospital Foundation valued at $33.5 million.

That accounting does not include the value of 1,500 high paying medical jobs in a region where the only growth industry is the medical industry.

What does the City really receive for the Hospital and its assets? What did the City really lose?
User avatar
Jim O'Bryan
Posts: 14196
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 10:12 pm
Location: Lakewood
Contact:

Re: Is The City’s Community Bulletin, Issue No. 5 Misleading?

Post by Jim O'Bryan »

Bill Call wrote: What does the City really receive for the Hospital and its assets? What did the City really lose?

Bill

As reported in my earliest conversations with Ken Haber, of LHF and LHA.

"Ken is any money coming back to Lakewood that did not start here?"

"No, none."


At that point the term "sale" seems like BS too.

This is a simple money laundering scheme, for a select few, to get land and money to develop.

No matter what it cost the rest of us.

Bill, who on the list of players, doesn't get little woodies on the thought of developing anything?

West End strip mall, get rid of 1,500 humans for cheesecake development. Ironically same group were using pets to get census over 50,000.

LakewoodAlive, nothing more than a move to DowntowN for their shallow development dreams. Same people promised high end, delivered 5 Guys, Dollar General, Quaker Steak.

Told us we needed to pour millions into Downtown to keep hospital here, when they were working to close it. Wanted it all for themselves.

Now that they are in their 60s, 70s and 80s, they have decided to sell of our largest assets for some magic beans before they go.

A truer statement would be, "We leverage $350 million in assets over 10 years, for $19.7 million now, and we also get to keep the money you gave to LHF for running the hospital."

pitiful.

.
.
Jim O'Bryan
Lakewood Resident

"The very act of observing disturbs the system."
Werner Heisenberg

"If anything I've said seems useful to you, I'm glad.
If not, don't worry. Just forget about it."
His Holiness The Dalai Lama
Bill Call
Posts: 3319
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 1:10 pm

Re: Is The City’s Community Bulletin, Issue No. 5 Misleading?

Post by Bill Call »

Tom Bullock is telling people that the Clinic will spend $20 million in transition costs. That is not mentioned anywhere in the Master Agreement. It certainly is not mentioned anywhere in the Community Bulletin.

Are they lying to themselves as well as everone else?
Bridget Conant
Posts: 2896
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 4:22 pm

Re: Is The City’s Community Bulletin, Issue No. 5 Misleading?

Post by Bridget Conant »

Tom Bullock is telling people that the Clinic will spend $20 million in transition costs. That is not mentioned anywhere in the Master Agreement. It certainly is not mentioned anywhere in the Community Bulletin.
They talk out of their arse.

Every time they tell the story the numbers change. The FHC was $36 million, no it's $50 million!!!! What next, $70 million?

They are like used car dealers - the deal changes every few minutes.

What is wrong with people that they are so gullible? They cannot deal with numbers? More than a few sentences are too hard to digest?
Missy Limkemann
Posts: 551
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 2:13 pm
Location: Lakewood
Contact:

Re: Is The City’s Community Bulletin, Issue No. 5 Misleading?

Post by Missy Limkemann »

Maybe they are using "new math".....
Time is precious, waste is wisely
Brian Essi
Posts: 2421
Joined: Thu May 07, 2015 11:46 am

Re: Is The City’s Community Bulletin, Issue No. 5 Misleading?

Post by Brian Essi »

100 BILLION DOLLARS!!

https://youtu.be/jTmXHvGZiSY?t=5s
David Anderson has no legitimate answers
Bill Call
Posts: 3319
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 1:10 pm

Re: Is The City’s Community Bulletin, Issue No. 5 Misleading?

Post by Bill Call »

If the truth is so great why do they lie?
User avatar
Jim O'Bryan
Posts: 14196
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 10:12 pm
Location: Lakewood
Contact:

Re: Is The City’s Community Bulletin, Issue No. 5 Misleading?

Post by Jim O'Bryan »

Bill Call wrote:If the truth is so great why do they lie?
Bill

I am convinced they can't stop.

It has cost this city everything. They lied during the West End, as they knew what was best. They lied during aspects of the schools buildings, like with Grant. Because they could not tell the truth.

Imagine Lakewood today, had they told the truth. Instead of building Grant, we could have built it at Kauffman Park, which would have left the School Board building and Grant property up for development. But to tell us the truth there, they would have told the truth about running the hospital out of town, and maybe lost control of the money. Oh wait their are "secret plans" for Kauffman Park. Well somewhere.

With DowntowN and "wayfinding" another proven scheme and lie, had they said we are making major changes, it would have made sense. Even DowntowN would have made more sense had they not lied every inch of the way on every aspect.

All of these things happened during the planning of closing the hospital, BUT, they can't tell the truth.

City Hall, and their minions cannot be trusted, nearly every time they prove they cannot be honest.

It is crazy!
Jim O'Bryan
Lakewood Resident

"The very act of observing disturbs the system."
Werner Heisenberg

"If anything I've said seems useful to you, I'm glad.
If not, don't worry. Just forget about it."
His Holiness The Dalai Lama
Bill Call
Posts: 3319
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 1:10 pm

Re: Is The City’s Community Bulletin, Issue No. 5 Misleading?

Post by Bill Call »

Misleading is the polite term for...
Bill Call
Posts: 3319
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 1:10 pm

Re: Is The City’s Community Bulletin, Issue No. 5 Misleading?

Post by Bill Call »

Did anyone notice that the City is counting the $7 million demo contribution twice? Once from the Clinic and once from the LHA.

If the truth is so great why do they lie?
Lori Allen _
Posts: 2550
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2015 2:37 pm

Re: Is The City’s Community Bulletin, Issue No. 5 Misleading?

Post by Lori Allen _ »

The demolition that we, the tax payers, are paying for? I bet I can guess who the demolition company will be. C and J Demolition? I recall that this company has been tearing down a lot of the properties that Summers and Extended family are allegedly stealing from Lakewood citizens, especially the elderly, terminally ill and the minorities. Hmmmmmmm!
Bill Call
Posts: 3319
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 1:10 pm

Re: Is The City’s Community Bulletin, Issue No. 5 Misleading?

Post by Bill Call »

If the truth is so wonderful why all the lies?
Post Reply