New Rules For The Deck Needed? Discussion

The jumping off discussion area for the rest of the Deck. All things Lakewood.
Please check out our other sections. As we refile many discussions from the past into
their proper sections please check them out and offer suggestions.

Moderator: Jim O'Bryan

Corey Rossen
Posts: 1663
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 12:09 pm

Re: New Rules For The Deck Needed?

Post by Corey Rossen »

Jim O'Bryan wrote:
Corey Rossen wrote: I have read them. Repeatedly. I wonder if you or moderators have.

I get it, everything is your/moderators discretion. This includes profanity, bumps, harassment, bullying, etc.

Enough discussion on this, nothing will change as we all can see. Someone just slipped in the word "pissed" into a post and nothing was done - see, nothing changes. Your discretion, I get it.

Corey

I went back and looked, no one has registered a complaint on profanity, bumps(? really), harassment, or bullying.

NO ONE, not even you, EVER.

Are you telling me, that you want me to take actions on my own? I get total discretion. You would support that every time?

Corey, you can't have it both ways.

As I have said, time and time again, read the rules you agreed too, read the new rules we are considering/trying.

.
Enough already, this is getting, and has been, old for all of us. Jim = Observer/Deck. Jim may or may not = Moderator. Therefore Jim is either one or both, but either way Jim is an "us." See below.
Jim O'Bryan wrote:

The rule the Deck has been under since day one.
Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned, with notification of your Internet Service Provider if deemed required by us.

You agree that “The Observation Deck” have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time should we see fit.

Potential New Rules

By registering at the Lakewood Observer Message Boards, users agree that any post deemed inappropriate may be removed at the sole discretion of the Lakewood Observer. Lakewood Observer also has the right, at its sole discretion, to revoke board privileges at any time without notice or reason.


Flaming, Bashing, Trolling, and Spam
Determination of flaming, trolling, and spam posts will be made at the discretion of mods.

Hacking, Scripting, and Altering Board Code
Accessing or using someone else's account is strictly prohibited. Hmmm. These actions are grounds for an immediate and permanent ban. Hmmm.

Bans
We only will discuss the nature, reason, and length of a ban with the user banned.

Questionable Content
Since we can't have a rule to cover everything, this is the rule to, well, cover everything.

These issues are left to the discretion of individual moderators, but may include any material that is knowingly false and/or defamatory, misleading, spammy, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, sexist, obscene, racist, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, that otherwise violates any law, or that encourages conduct constituting a criminal offense.

There are hundreds of of posts each day on the Lakewood Observer message boards, so we can't always promise you'll receive a warning every time action has to be taken. By registering at the Lakewood Observer Message Boards, users agree that any post deemed inappropriate may be removed at the sole discretion of Lakewood Observer.
These are the rules you wrote, or wrote in collaboration, or agreed to, or signed off on. I have read them. There is nothing wrong with the rules, they protect the business as they should. I think the business forgets what is in the rules. Or the business has an identity crisis while changing between hats. either way, the business is trying to have it all. Whoever the business is.

Discretion. Lakewood Observer. We.

Now, enough already. Move along.
Corey Rossen

"I have neither aligned myself with SLH, nor BL." ~ Jim O'Bryan

"I am not neutral." ~Jim O'Bryan

"I am not here to stir up anything." ~Jim O'Bryan
cmager
Posts: 697
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 8:33 am

Re: New Rules For The Deck Needed?

Post by cmager »

Corey Rossen wrote:
cmager wrote:Mr. Rossen,
This is truly heart-rending. Here's the difference.

You are talking about various aspects of being a victim, and/or purposely blowing up threads with which you and your team disagree. You can't seem to get unstuck from doing so, or it is indeed your purpose.

Most others on The Deck are talking about and sharing pictures of clouds, fauna, and nature. Most others are talking about community issues like trash, politics, hospitals, schools and high schools, athletics, city services, city hall, people in the city, businesses, roads and traffic, restaurants and food, weather, the performing arts, music, history, trees, parks, signs, homes, events...shared experiences. These are things of interest, often vital to the community of Lakewood. I have frequently referred to this as content.

I honestly don't think you'll get the distinction.
Hmm...this interested you enough to post.
Move along.

Enough already, move along and talk about your picture of clouds with fauna on the trees over a pile of trash near the hospital and down the street from a school athletic field that is being poorly serviced by the city services of City Hall while your business is suffering due to bad roads and traffic because of bad weather...because from I can tell, you lack content by your own definition. Check your posts again. Every. Single. One. Of. Them. While you are at it, check to see who is calling themselves victims time and time again. Then check again to see if those same people are trying to halt the freedom of speech. Then check again to see who is blowing up threads, or even more unoriginal - bumping and then bumping and then bumping again. I believe that is stuck in a rut by sheer repetition alone.

I have no purpose, what is yours? Please do tell, because apparently you have one in all of your mundane posts about nothing - you're like Seinfeld of Lakewood.

Move along.
I honestly don't think you'll get the distinction. << So, this is confirmed.
But by all means make sure you get the last word.
Corey Rossen
Posts: 1663
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 12:09 pm

Re: New Rules For The Deck Needed?

Post by Corey Rossen »

cmager wrote:
Corey Rossen wrote:
cmager wrote:Mr. Rossen,
This is truly heart-rending. Here's the difference.

You are talking about various aspects of being a victim, and/or purposely blowing up threads with which you and your team disagree. You can't seem to get unstuck from doing so, or it is indeed your purpose.

Most others on The Deck are talking about and sharing pictures of clouds, fauna, and nature. Most others are talking about community issues like trash, politics, hospitals, schools and high schools, athletics, city services, city hall, people in the city, businesses, roads and traffic, restaurants and food, weather, the performing arts, music, history, trees, parks, signs, homes, events...shared experiences. These are things of interest, often vital to the community of Lakewood. I have frequently referred to this as content.

I honestly don't think you'll get the distinction.
Hmm...this interested you enough to post.
Move along.

Enough already, move along and talk about your picture of clouds with fauna on the trees over a pile of trash near the hospital and down the street from a school athletic field that is being poorly serviced by the city services of City Hall while your business is suffering due to bad roads and traffic because of bad weather...because from I can tell, you lack content by your own definition. Check your posts again. Every. Single. One. Of. Them. While you are at it, check to see who is calling themselves victims time and time again. Then check again to see if those same people are trying to halt the freedom of speech. Then check again to see who is blowing up threads, or even more unoriginal - bumping and then bumping and then bumping again. I believe that is stuck in a rut by sheer repetition alone.

I have no purpose, what is yours? Please do tell, because apparently you have one in all of your mundane posts about nothing - you're like Seinfeld of Lakewood.

Move along.
I honestly don't think you'll get the distinction. << So, this is confirmed.
But by all means make sure you get the last word.
Long-winded "bump?"
Jim O'Bryan wrote:Exploiting loopholes to circumvent rules will also result in a ban.
:wink:
Corey Rossen

"I have neither aligned myself with SLH, nor BL." ~ Jim O'Bryan

"I am not neutral." ~Jim O'Bryan

"I am not here to stir up anything." ~Jim O'Bryan
Brian Essi
Posts: 2421
Joined: Thu May 07, 2015 11:46 am

Re: New Rules For The Deck Needed?

Post by Brian Essi »

Irony

The evidence establishes that this thread was started due to conduct by two people.

It had been perpetuated by one of those two people while that same person continues to suggest that the thread should end ...yet that same person cannot let anyone else have the last word to end the thread.

Truly ironic.
David Anderson has no legitimate answers
cmager
Posts: 697
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 8:33 am

Re: New Rules For The Deck Needed?

Post by cmager »

Said individual has this long-running signature (below), yet claims no ill will towards The LO and The Deck. Clearly acting as a provocateur to damage The LO and the public service it performs. Enough already. #lastword

"I have neither aligned myself with SLH, nor BL." ~ Jim O'Bryan
"I am not neutral." ~Jim O'Bryan
"I am not here to stir up anything." ~Jim O'Bryan
Bridget Conant
Posts: 2896
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 4:22 pm

Re: New Rules For The Deck Needed?

Post by Bridget Conant »

If you read between the lines of his "messages," he's trying to get certain people to say or "admit" things that he and his team believe are true, but are in fact, falsehoods.

Why don't you grow some cojones, Corey, and tell whoever is pulling your strings to get a pair of their own?
Corey Rossen
Posts: 1663
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 12:09 pm

Re: New Rules For The Deck Needed?

Post by Corey Rossen »

Bridget Conant wrote:If you read between the lines of his "messages," he's trying to get certain people to say or "admit" things that he and his team believe are true, but are in fact, falsehoods.

Why don't you grow some cojones, Corey, and tell whoever is pulling your strings to get a pair of their own?
Huh?

ps You are ruining your team's stance that I want last word by asking me to respond. :wink:
Corey Rossen

"I have neither aligned myself with SLH, nor BL." ~ Jim O'Bryan

"I am not neutral." ~Jim O'Bryan

"I am not here to stir up anything." ~Jim O'Bryan
Corey Rossen
Posts: 1663
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 12:09 pm

Re: New Rules For The Deck Needed?

Post by Corey Rossen »

Brian Essi wrote:Irony

The evidence establishes that this thread was started due to conduct by two people.

It had been perpetuated by one of those two people while that same person continues to suggest that the thread should end ...yet that same person cannot let anyone else have the last word to end the thread.

Truly ironic.
If I always must be on the defensive it is hard to allow others the last word. Isn't that why the antagonist or agitator always wants the last word, to win, right? Stop trying to win and I can stop posting. Had you left it where it was and not mention me, so that you are forcing me to come back on and post, who is really at fault? Hint: think mirror.

Technically, this should be the last word because, through experience, I have learned that you view questions and question marks as irrelevant.

Go ahead, have last word - I don't care. Just don't do it in a fashion where I don't need to come back and post something. I triple-dog-dare you to pull that off.
Corey Rossen

"I have neither aligned myself with SLH, nor BL." ~ Jim O'Bryan

"I am not neutral." ~Jim O'Bryan

"I am not here to stir up anything." ~Jim O'Bryan
Dan Alaimo
Posts: 2140
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 8:49 am

Re: New Rules For The Deck Needed?

Post by Dan Alaimo »

period. (?)
“Never let a good crisis go to waste." - Winston Churchill (Quote later appropriated by Rahm Emanuel)
cmager
Posts: 697
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 8:33 am

Re: New Rules For The Deck Needed?

Post by cmager »

cmager wrote:Said individual has this long-running signature (below), yet claims no ill will towards The LO and The Deck. Clearly acting as a provocateur to damage The LO and the public service it performs. Enough already. #lastword

"I have neither aligned myself with SLH, nor BL." ~ Jim O'Bryan
"I am not neutral." ~Jim O'Bryan
"I am not here to stir up anything." ~Jim O'Bryan
Contriving a reason, and then insisting on having the #lastword is amongst the behaviors to which you appear to be blind. Enough already.
Corey Rossen
Posts: 1663
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 12:09 pm

Re: New Rules For The Deck Needed?

Post by Corey Rossen »

cmager wrote:
cmager wrote:Said individual has this long-running signature (below), yet claims no ill will towards The LO and The Deck. Clearly acting as a provocateur to damage The LO and the public service it performs. Enough already. #lastword

"I have neither aligned myself with SLH, nor BL." ~ Jim O'Bryan
"I am not neutral." ~Jim O'Bryan
"I am not here to stir up anything." ~Jim O'Bryan
Contriving a reason, and then insisting on having the #lastword is amongst the behaviors to which you appear to be blind. Enough already.
I hope this amuses you as much as it amuses me. Stop already, you are breaking the #lastword rules of engagement. Apparently, you just don't get it.

Stop!
Corey Rossen

"I have neither aligned myself with SLH, nor BL." ~ Jim O'Bryan

"I am not neutral." ~Jim O'Bryan

"I am not here to stir up anything." ~Jim O'Bryan
Bridget Conant
Posts: 2896
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 4:22 pm

Re: New Rules For The Deck Needed?

Post by Bridget Conant »

Your repeated nonsensical, childish, whiny posts are doing far more damage to your reputation than anyone calling your sponsors (if it even happened.) Did you ever hear of Google?
Corey Rossen
Posts: 1663
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 12:09 pm

Re: New Rules For The Deck Needed?

Post by Corey Rossen »

Bridget Conant wrote:Your repeated nonsensical, childish, whiny posts are doing far more damage to your reputation than anyone calling your sponsors (if it even happened.) Did you ever hear of Google?
Again. It is very simple...leave me out of it and I stay away.
Corey Rossen

"I have neither aligned myself with SLH, nor BL." ~ Jim O'Bryan

"I am not neutral." ~Jim O'Bryan

"I am not here to stir up anything." ~Jim O'Bryan
Bridget Conant
Posts: 2896
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 4:22 pm

Re: New Rules For The Deck Needed?

Post by Bridget Conant »

No, you interject yourself repeatedly of your own accord.

Anyone reading these threads and viewing your posts gets a good picture of your personality.

Have at it. Google loves it.
Corey Rossen
Posts: 1663
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 12:09 pm

Re: New Rules For The Deck Needed?

Post by Corey Rossen »

Bridget Conant wrote:No, you interject yourself repeatedly of your own accord.
Nope.
Corey Rossen

"I have neither aligned myself with SLH, nor BL." ~ Jim O'Bryan

"I am not neutral." ~Jim O'Bryan

"I am not here to stir up anything." ~Jim O'Bryan
Post Reply