Insiders Rebrand As Voters For Progress To Raise "Dark Money" at Rozi's Event

[cmager]

It appears she may have removed herself from the board. You cannot click on her name any longer. But she made one last post!

That she was motivated to think of me, in what may be her farewell, is quite moving. Pardon me while I reflect upon our good times.

[Brian Essi]

https://youtu.be/PHQLQ1Rc_Js?t=8s

[m buckley]

It appears she may have removed herself from the board. You cannot click on her name any longer.
But she made one last post!

Maybe she was banned.

I doubt she was banned. I think it's more likely that she was benched by Build Lakewood.
Having her in the rotation as we lead up to the election would have been a liability at best for Build Lakewood.

[cmager]

It appears she may have removed herself from the board. You cannot click on her name any longer. But she made one last post!

Maybe she was banned.

I doubt she was banned. I think it's more likely that she was benched by Build Lakewood. Having her in the rotation as we lead up to the election would have been a liability at best for Build Lakewood.

...helpfully, you mean "Build Lakewood" rebranded by discredited, conflicted dark money Lakewood Insiders as "Lakewood Voters for Progress" (and Multi-Year Fraud).

[cmager]

It appears she may have removed herself from the board. You cannot click on her name any longer. But she made one last post!

Maybe she was banned.

I doubt she was banned. I think it's more likely that she was benched by Build Lakewood. Having her in the rotation as we lead up to the election would have been a liability at best for Build Lakewood.

...helpfully, you mean "Build Lakewood" rebranded by discredited, conflicted dark money Lakewood Insiders as "Lakewood Voters for Progress (and Multi-Year Fraud)"

[m buckley]

It appears she may have removed herself from the board. You cannot click on her name any longer. But she made one last post!

Maybe she was banned.

I doubt she was banned. I think it's more likely that she was benched by Build Lakewood. Having her in the rotation as we lead up to the election would have been a liability at best for Build Lakewood.

...helpfully, you mean "Build Lakewood" rebranded by discredited, conflicted dark money Lakewood Insiders as "Lakewood Voters for Progress (and Multi-Year Fraud)"

Mr. Mager, Thank you for the assist. I can't keep up with those guys.
"Lakewood Insiders for Progress" is that right?

[cmager]

It appears she may have removed herself from the board. You cannot click on her name any longer. But she made one last post!

Maybe she was banned.

I doubt she was banned. I think it's more likely that she was benched by Build Lakewood. Having her in the rotation as we lead up to the election would have been a liability at best for Build Lakewood.

...helpfully, you mean "Build Lakewood" rebranded by discredited, conflicted, dark money Lakewood Insiders as "Lakewood Voters for Progress (and Multi-Year Fraud)"

Mr. Mager, Thank you for the assist. I can't keep up with those guys. "Lakewood Insiders for Progress" is that right?

Sure, that works as an alternate descriptor for discredited, conflicted, dark money "Lakewood Insiders Misleading Lakewood Voters"

[Brian Essi]

It appears she may have removed herself from the board. You cannot click on her name any longer. But she made one last post!

Maybe she was banned.

I doubt she was banned. I think it's more likely that she was benched by Build Lakewood. Having her in the rotation as we lead up to the election would have been a liability at best for Build Lakewood.

...helpfully, you mean "Build Lakewood" rebranded by discredited, conflicted dark money Lakewood Insiders as "Lakewood Voters for Progress (and Multi-Year Fraud)"

Mr. Mager, Thank you for the assist. I can't keep up with those guys. "Lakewood Insiders for Progress" is that right?

Sure, that works as an alternate descriptor of discredited, conflicted, dark money "Lakewood Insiders Misleading Lakewood Voters"

Messrs. Buckley and Mager,

You are so gentlemanly.

May I suggest the following descriptor "Fraud" from ordinary parlance be included in the rebrand of the rebrand.

One common definition of "fraud" is a person or thing intended to deceive others, typically by unjustifiably claiming or being credited with accomplishments or qualities.

In think it is accurate that LVFP "intends to deceive others by unjustifiably claiming or being credited with accomplishments and qualities." i.e., its a fraud.

So how about: "Lakewood Insiders For Fraud"

And their "Forward" mantra be rebranded as "Fraud-ward"

My apologies, as has been noted, I am not very good at messaging.

[cmager]

It appears she may have removed herself from the board. You cannot click on her name any longer. But she made one last post!

Maybe she was banned.

I doubt she was banned. I think it's more likely that she was benched by Build Lakewood. Having her in the rotation as we lead up to the election would have been a liability at best for Build Lakewood.

...helpfully, you mean "Build Lakewood" rebranded by discredited, conflicted dark money Lakewood Insiders as "Lakewood Voters for Progress (and Multi-Year Fraud)"

Mr. Mager, Thank you for the assist. I can't keep up with those guys. "Lakewood Insiders for Progress" is that right?

Sure, that works as an alternate descriptor of discredited, conflicted, dark money "Lakewood Insiders Misleading Lakewood Voters"

Messrs. Buckley and Mager, you are so gentlemanly.
May I suggest the following descriptor "Fraud" from ordinary parlance be included in the rebrand of the rebrand. One common definition of "fraud" is a person or thing intended to deceive others, typically by unjustifiably claiming or being credited with accomplishments or qualities. I think it is accurate that LVFP "intends to deceive others by unjustifiably claiming or being credited with accomplishments and qualities." i.e., its a fraud.

So how about: "Lakewood Insiders For Fraud"...and their "Forward" mantra be rebranded as "Fraud-ward"
My apologies, as has been noted, I am not very good at messaging.

Mr. Essi, we are quite civil, thank you! To my thinking, one does not want to torture it too much. One wants the same structure and cadence, and one wants to draw from the same word palette, so as to memorably link the presented message with the more true message.

To me, LIFF is reasonable, but Fraud-ward seems a bit tortured. Reasonable people may disagree

[Corey Rossen]

Maybe she was banned.

Hey Deck/Observer,

Was she banned?

[Bridget Conant]

No, we have her blindfolded and gagged in our secret back room where we talk about you.

[Patrick Wadden]

Nice!

[Kate McCarthy]

No, we have her blindfolded and gagged in our secret back room where we talk about you.