Okay, I'll buy that. So what if one of them had to get to Fairview in a big hurry? I guess it's all good as long as they defeat the referendum.Brian Essi wrote:Dan,Dan Alaimo wrote:Brian, your article in this week's Observer issue was excellent - perhaps one of the finest explanations yet of the hospital issue.Brian Essi wrote:The only road that leads to a hospital in Lakewood in the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth...that will bring accountability, compensation and Justice for those who destroyed the easy ride to the hospital 1 mile or less from our homes.
The heads of pins are "not roads to a hospital".
Everyone should read it, especially anyone on the fence or in support of closing the hospital.
http://lakewoodobserver.com/read/2016/0 ... nscover-up
That said...
You just hijacked a thread I started. The is about an actual problem with real roads leading to area hospitals.
And that said...
There are criticisms to be made:
* The City certainly knew about this construction well in advance and they could have made contingencies. At least publicize the routing Chief Gilman mentioned. Was it known before the rushed December vote? I'll bet it was.
* CCF closed the hospital much earlier than they originally planned. The City could have intervened and encouraged CCF to keep it open at least through the construction season.
I know directly from multiple reliable insiders on the deal.
So everyone should listen to this established fact:
The sole reason that they moved the hospital closing up to February was to manufacture a legal argument to defeat the referendum that they all knew was coming.
Given what this thread is about, that is just plain reckless evil on the part of Summers, Bullock, Butler and the other PAC of liars. They just don't care about people.
This whole thing stinks so bad that even a necessity like road construction gets tainted.
(Here's hoping I got this comment posted before Corey jumps in.)