Corey Rossen wrote:Jim,
What is your take on the formation of the new healthy organization? Should it be frowned upon, mocked and ridiculed because of the situation you say it derived from? Or, should it be the "lemonade" made from the situation. There is a real opportunity for the community to capitalize and benefit from an organization such as this (just as other communities have community-health related organizations). I understand it does not provide jobs or the same healthcare a hospital offers, but should the community as a whole take a step towards an opportunity to be heart-healthier or turn its collective nose up and shun the opportunity? You know the downside of a lack of heart-health, what is your stance?
Corey
My stance on this is the same as it has always been. It is the same on saving the hospital or building whatever.
I want to understand how we got here, and why City Hall had to lie every step of the way. This is why I said what you quote in your posts. Don't really care about Build or Save, until we found out what went wrong and what can we fix.
Corey what is better a $16 million dollar private group looking for health money, or the City getting $120 million to build a rec center or whatever?
That is what we are talking about, many lawyers including one from the DOJ, now retired, think we are owed a lot more money. At what point is getting more a bad thing?
After understanding how we got here, I could support a completely autonomous citizen group looking into it, but they would have to start fresh.
I am having a hard time believing anything from City Hall, they lie, connive, misrepresent, and are control freaks, and it is getting worse not better.
.