When is it perjury?

[Marguerite Harkness]

Is it perjury when the Mayor lies the first time in the sworn deposition?
Or is it perjury when he changes the answer that was given under sworn oath?
When he changes his answer, IS that under sworn oath? Or not?

(I use the term "lies" because HE decided that was not the right answer, and he decided to change his answer.)

[Bridget Conant]

"Changing" your answers given in a sworn deposition doesn't mean the court changes your response. The original deposition remains in the record, as does the errata. Therefore, the witness can be questioned about the discrepancies in a trial, which may cause doubt about their credibility.

http://www.jonesday.com/files/Publicati ... ticle2.pdf

[tom monahan]

Bridget:

I believe that type of action (changing your answers) gave rise the famous Perry Mason question: "Were you lying then, or are you lying now?" Just saying....

[T Peppard]

...another one from the Perry Mason show:

There are times when you have to fight as a matter of moral and ethical principle-
https://youtu.be/iBFEqXynr8Y

[Marguerite Harkness]

Again I ask. Now that you've read the mayor's deposition, the plaintiffs' request, and Essi's commentary.
IS IT PERJURY YET????
Isn't that a federal offense????

[Brian Essi]

Again I ask. Now that you've read the mayor's deposition, the plaintiffs' request, and Essi's commentary.
IS IT PERJURY YET????
Isn't that a federal offense????

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/perjury

Perjury
A crime that occurs when an individual willfully makes a false statement during a judicial proceeding, after he or she has taken an oath to speak the truth.
The common-law crime of perjury is now governed by both state and federal laws. In addition, the Model Penal Code, which has been adopted in some form by many states and promulgated by the Commission on Uniform State Laws, also sets forth the following basic elements for the crime of perjury: (1) a false statement is made under oath or equivalent affirmation during a judicial proceeding; (2) the statement must be material or relevant to the proceeding; and (3) the witness must have the Specific Intent to deceive.
The punishment for perjury in most states, and under federal law, is the imposition of a fine, imprisonment, or both. Federal law also imposes sentencing enhancements when the court determines that a defendant has falsely testified on her own behalf and is convicted. Under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, the court is required to automatically increase the defendant's sentence.
Two federal statutes govern the crime of perjury in federal proceedings. Title 18 U.S.C.A. § 1621 codifies the Common Law of perjury and consists of the elements listed above. In 1970, the scope of section 1621 was expanded by the enactment of 18 U.S.C.A. § 1623. Section 1623 changes the definition of intent from willfully offering false testimony to merely having knowledge that the testimony is false. In addition it adds to the definition of perjury to include the witness's use of information, including any book, paper, document, record, recording, or other material she knows contains a false material declaration, and includes proceedings that are ancillary to any court, such as affidavits and depositions, and Grand Jury proceedings. Section 1623 also contains a retraction defense. If, during the proceeding in which the false statement was made, the person admits to the falsity of the statement before it is evident that the falsity has been or will be exposed, and as long as the falsity does not affect the proceeding substantially, prosecution will be barred under section 1623.
Commentators believe that the existence of these two federal statutes actually frustrates the goals of Congress to encourage truthful statements. The reasoning behind this concern is that when a retraction exists, prosecutors may charge a witness with perjury under section 1621 and when a retraction does not exist, the witness may be charged under section 1623.
Two variations of perjury are Subornation of Perjury and false swearing; in many states these two variations are separate offenses. Subornation of perjury is a crime in which the defendant does not actually testify falsely but instead induces, persuades, instigates, or in some way procures another witness to commit perjury. False swearing is a false statement made under oath but not made during an official proceeding. Some states have created a separate offense for false swearing, while others have enacted perjury statutes to include this type of false statement. These crimes also may be punished by the imposition of a fine, imprisonment, or both.
Further readings
Aycock, George W. III. 1993."Nothing But the Truth: A Solution to the Current Inadequacies of the Federal Perjury Statutes." Valparaiso Law Review 28.
Curriden, Mark. 1995. "The Lies Have It." ABA Journal 81.
Feinstein, Ami L. 1993. "United States v. Dunnigan and Sentence Enhancements for Perjury: Constitutional Perhaps, but Unnecessary in Fact." American Criminal Law Review 31.