TRAFFIC: A MESS > DETROIT @ WARREN
Moderator: Jim O'Bryan
-
jackie f taylor
- Posts: 773
- Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 8:47 am
TRAFFIC: A MESS > DETROIT @ WARREN
ON WARREN road, I drive south from Clifton, towards Detroit, more often than not, cars traveling west on Detroit, creep forward "to make the light" and they' get stuck in the intersection, no one can move, isn't there a law? Where is the traffic enforcement?
-
Michael Deneen
- Posts: 2133
- Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 4:10 pm
Re: TRAFFIC: A MESS > DETROIT @ WARREN
"The Powers That Be" like it this way.
They want to slow traffic in downtown in an attempt to have drivers notice local businesses.
If there is an accident or two at that intersection, that's just the cost of doing business.
They want to slow traffic in downtown in an attempt to have drivers notice local businesses.
If there is an accident or two at that intersection, that's just the cost of doing business.
-
Corey Rossen
- Posts: 1663
- Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 12:09 pm
Re: TRAFFIC: A MESS > DETROIT @ WARREN
I actually think that the traffic conditions are bad for businesses. Drivers pay more attention (as they should) to cars around them and the numerous traffic lights. This means that window displays and promotional signage goes mostly unnoticed. A business can spend a lot of money on a sign but if no one has a chance to look up at it is it really worth it?
Corey Rossen
"I have neither aligned myself with SLH, nor BL." ~ Jim O'Bryan
"I am not neutral." ~Jim O'Bryan
"I am not here to stir up anything." ~Jim O'Bryan
"I have neither aligned myself with SLH, nor BL." ~ Jim O'Bryan
"I am not neutral." ~Jim O'Bryan
"I am not here to stir up anything." ~Jim O'Bryan
-
Michael Deneen
- Posts: 2133
- Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 4:10 pm
Re: TRAFFIC: A MESS > DETROIT @ WARREN
I agree. In addition, many folks (like me) avoid downtown whenever possible....which is defeats the purpose.Corey Rossen wrote:I actually think that the traffic conditions are bad for businesses. Drivers pay more attention (as they should) to cars around them and the numerous traffic lights. This means that window displays and promotional signage goes mostly unnoticed. A business can spend a lot of money on a sign but if no one has a chance to look up at it is it really worth it?
-
Dan Alaimo
- Posts: 2140
- Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 8:49 am
Re: TRAFFIC: A MESS > DETROIT @ WARREN
Isn't this kind of a BLM strategy on a municipal scale?
“Never let a good crisis go to waste." - Winston Churchill (Quote later appropriated by Rahm Emanuel)
-
Lori Allen _
- Posts: 2550
- Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2015 2:37 pm
Re: TRAFFIC: A MESS > DETROIT @ WARREN
I am not against people who ride bikes, however, when are the police going to start ticketing them? A lot go through red lights, right turn on red, etc. I thought they had to follow the rules of the road too.
-
james fitzgibbons
- Posts: 412
- Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 3:34 pm
Re: TRAFFIC: A MESS > DETROIT @ WARREN
I agree Lori, I have never seen a biker pulled over, they are supposed to obey the laws. Police do not have enough time to bother with it.
-
Corey Rossen
- Posts: 1663
- Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 12:09 pm
Re: TRAFFIC: A MESS > DETROIT @ WARREN
I have been pulled over in Lakewood on a bike for red lights.james fitzgibbons wrote:I agree Lori, I have never seen a biker pulled over, they are supposed to obey the laws. Police do not have enough time to bother with it.
Corey Rossen
"I have neither aligned myself with SLH, nor BL." ~ Jim O'Bryan
"I am not neutral." ~Jim O'Bryan
"I am not here to stir up anything." ~Jim O'Bryan
"I have neither aligned myself with SLH, nor BL." ~ Jim O'Bryan
"I am not neutral." ~Jim O'Bryan
"I am not here to stir up anything." ~Jim O'Bryan
-
michael gill
- Posts: 391
- Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2006 11:28 am
- Location: lakewood
Re: TRAFFIC: A MESS > DETROIT @ WARREN
I have also been pulled over in Lakewood for running a red light while cycling. And I know others who have, too, besides Cory.
-
tom monahan
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Fri Apr 10, 2015 12:48 pm
Re: TRAFFIC: A MESS > DETROIT @ WARREN
In the past three years, my wife and I have seen 10 bike riders obey the traffic laws. I have had three close encounters with bikers who blatantly disregard the law and put their lives in jeopardy . One of those was Tom Bullock who was going home after a council meeting and he was wearing a black helmet and dark clothing.
Mr. Bullock should sponsor legislation on the equipping of bikes for nighttime riding. These should include reflective safety vests, helmets, proper lighting and most of all, all bikes should be registered. A fair license fee, in my judgment, should be at least $25 per year if bikers want to share the roadway with automobile operators.
Mr. Bullock should sponsor legislation on the equipping of bikes for nighttime riding. These should include reflective safety vests, helmets, proper lighting and most of all, all bikes should be registered. A fair license fee, in my judgment, should be at least $25 per year if bikers want to share the roadway with automobile operators.
-
cameron karslake
- Posts: 646
- Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2015 8:35 am
Re: TRAFFIC: A MESS > DETROIT @ WARREN
What you are seeing, more and more often during the day, is the result of the "traffic calming" trend sweeping Cuyahoga County. If anything, this traffic calming philosophy creates more road rage if you ask me...and it's not necessarily directed towards the cars around you but to the idiots who create and approve such street striping that leads to gridlock. Detroit used to move along like nobody's business. Those were the days!
-
michael gill
- Posts: 391
- Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2006 11:28 am
- Location: lakewood
Re: TRAFFIC: A MESS > DETROIT @ WARREN
I'd like it if traffic laws were written to manage a given vehicle's potential danger to others.
For example, a 2000 pound steel box rolling down Detroit at 35 miles per hour is quite a bit more dangerous to other people than a bicycle rolling along at 15 miles per hour.
The person on the bike rolling along at 15 MPH is quite a bit more dangerous than a person walking.
People using public rights of way should be held accountable for the danger they pose to others.
For example, a 2000 pound steel box rolling down Detroit at 35 miles per hour is quite a bit more dangerous to other people than a bicycle rolling along at 15 miles per hour.
The person on the bike rolling along at 15 MPH is quite a bit more dangerous than a person walking.
People using public rights of way should be held accountable for the danger they pose to others.
-
michael gill
- Posts: 391
- Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2006 11:28 am
- Location: lakewood
Re: TRAFFIC: A MESS > DETROIT @ WARREN
But this is serious thread drift.
What began this conversation was someone pointing out that people driving cars habitually move into the Detroit Ave intersection with Warren and get stuck there after the light changes, effectively making a wall against traffic entering from Warren.
What began this conversation was someone pointing out that people driving cars habitually move into the Detroit Ave intersection with Warren and get stuck there after the light changes, effectively making a wall against traffic entering from Warren.
-
Peter Grossetti
- Posts: 1533
- Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2011 10:43 pm
Re: TRAFFIC: A MESS > DETROIT @ WARREN
This never happened when the X crosswalk was there.jackie f taylor wrote:ON WARREN road, I drive south from Clifton, towards Detroit, more often than not, cars traveling west on Detroit, creep forward "to make the light" and they' get stuck in the intersection, no one can move, isn't there a law? Where is the traffic enforcement?
"So, let's make the most of this beautiful day.
Since we're together we might as well say:
Would you be mine? Could you be mine?
Won't you be my neighbor?"
~ Fred (Mr. Rogers) Rogers
Since we're together we might as well say:
Would you be mine? Could you be mine?
Won't you be my neighbor?"
~ Fred (Mr. Rogers) Rogers
-
Michael Deneen
- Posts: 2133
- Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 4:10 pm
Re: TRAFFIC: A MESS > DETROIT @ WARREN
I remember the "X" crosswalk as a child.
It's the only one of its kind that ever remember seeing.
It stuck in my mind because it looked like a Confederate flag. (Back in the 70s, the Confederate flag did not have such negative connotations...it belonged to the Dukes of Hazzard and Southern rockers).
Does anyone know how long it was there?
Where did the idea come from?
Why did they get rid of it?
It's the only one of its kind that ever remember seeing.
It stuck in my mind because it looked like a Confederate flag. (Back in the 70s, the Confederate flag did not have such negative connotations...it belonged to the Dukes of Hazzard and Southern rockers).
Does anyone know how long it was there?
Where did the idea come from?
Why did they get rid of it?