What Does History Call The Marriage Of Big Business and Government?

The jumping off discussion area for the rest of the Deck. All things Lakewood.
Please check out our other sections. As we refile many discussions from the past into
their proper sections please check them out and offer suggestions.

Moderator: Jim O'Bryan

Brian Essi
Posts: 2421
Joined: Thu May 07, 2015 11:46 am

What Does History Call The Marriage Of Big Business and Government?

Post by Brian Essi »

It is happening in Lakewood. "In the words of City Council: Key Points of the Agreement"

"This agreement means a unique partnership between a community, its doctors and other healthcare providers".

The agreement (if we ever see it) is really only between the City and CCF--and not "a community and its doctors and other healthcare providers" so this is a dishonest and misleading statement i.e. Propaganda.

So what does history call it when a "powerful" leader and a unanimous City Council are in lock step have formed a marriage with a powerful and mighty corporate entity like CCF?
David Anderson has no legitimate answers
tom monahan
Posts: 86
Joined: Fri Apr 10, 2015 12:48 pm

Re: What Does History Call The Marriage Of Big Business and Government?

Post by tom monahan »

Brian:

It's called a "company town."
Brian Essi
Posts: 2421
Joined: Thu May 07, 2015 11:46 am

Re: What Does History Call The Marriage Of Big Business and Government?

Post by Brian Essi »

tom monahan wrote:Brian:

It's called a "company town."
Tom,

That presumes that our "powerful" executive and his legislators are in fact "weak". And you may be right. But one Legislator told me that. the Executive "really believes" in "his" plan. So that implies that it an almost dictatorial "solution" by a supreme leader albeit with the help and power of the almighty CCF. After all, CCF could not accomplish this witth the supreme leader and not could the leader have been rejected without the CCF.

So presuming our perceived "alpha male" leader is not weak, what model in history in the last 80 years or so speaks to the marriage of government and big business?
David Anderson has no legitimate answers
christopher dan
Posts: 60
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2015 4:48 pm
Location: ohio
Contact:

Re: What Does History Call The Marriage Of Big Business and Government?

Post by christopher dan »

the enron scandel?
Growing your own food that is pesticide and NON GMO-(genetically modified) is the key to health- www.cdan.towergarden.com :D
scott gilman
Posts: 82
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 6:10 pm

Re: What Does History Call The Marriage Of Big Business and Government?

Post by scott gilman »

Corporatism
Brian Essi
Posts: 2421
Joined: Thu May 07, 2015 11:46 am

Re: What Does History Call The Marriage Of Big Business and Government?

Post by Brian Essi »

scott gilman wrote:Corporatism
That implies "common interests". There may be common interests between Summers and CCF. However, in our city it is clear that a health half have different interests and another portion has been misled with lies and Propaganda
David Anderson has no legitimate answers
cameron karslake
Posts: 646
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2015 8:35 am

Re: What Does History Call The Marriage Of Big Business and Government?

Post by cameron karslake »

Fascism is what I call it.

New world order anyone?

One of the most difficult cancers to eradicate.

Hello?!

Brian, love your "hints"...
Dan Alaimo
Posts: 2140
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 8:49 am

Re: What Does History Call The Marriage Of Big Business and Government?

Post by Dan Alaimo »

This is not what Brian is after, but it certainly is quite Nixonian.
“Never let a good crisis go to waste." - Winston Churchill (Quote later appropriated by Rahm Emanuel)
Brian Essi
Posts: 2421
Joined: Thu May 07, 2015 11:46 am

Re: What Does History Call The Marriage Of Big Business and Government?

Post by Brian Essi »

cameron karslake wrote:Fascism is what I call it.

New world order anyone?

One of the most difficult cancers to eradicate.

Hello?!

Brian, love your "hints"...
Cameron,

I like your intellectual consistency and adherence to principle.
David Anderson has no legitimate answers
Post Reply