I will also point out that No Child Left Behind and many other Federal regulations that have been passed have given public schools unfunded mandates which have hurt. That is one of the reasons that I am pleased that our new Congress and Obama is looking at this issue. Systems with a more diverse population get hurt.
However, I take exception to your statement:
My figures are not perception, they are reality. I have been very good about where I have gotten the numbers and have cited the websites from which they have come so that everyone can see the reality. The State of Ohio Department of Education Power User Reports, Ohio School Board Association and the Plain Dealer for the proposed salaryOn a side note: Before the next operating appears, the school board is going to have to strip the perceptions that accompany your post with the realities of my post. How much is enough to get the job done with a given set of variables? Voting the perceptions and not the reality could hurt many.
I question whether having a diverse population and being squeezed financially by unfunded mandates means that our superintendent should make 60% more than the Strongsville Superintendent when we are in economic distress. Or 60% more than he did previously in the same school district 10 years ago.
That other web site was giving the perception and I am paraphrasing that "since Madak is already getting retirement from the Lakewood Public Schools he is serving at a very low salary to help out the people of Lakewood" and isn't that a good example for the children of Lakewood that he would work at a lower salary since the he was already financially set." That is not reality.
I am totally for reality and not perception. I am strongly dedicated to excellence in education and want the best public schools for the children in Lakewood.
In the spirit of open government and separating reality from perception would the school board be willing to post the contract they are voting on Monday with all additional side contracts, addendums, etc.?