Shawn Juris wrote:Jim,
I'm by no means an expert or even all that familiar with windmills and their cost/benefits over a life cycle. At the research and development phase though, Lakewood does appear to be a key location for this type of project. I would be surprised if the city was not approached or has not been actively seeking out the opportunity. From what I understand windfarms are being subsidized in some way. I imagine that its similar to the rents that buildings with high elevations collect from wireless company's so they can put up their antennas. While the technology hasn't yet perfected this product that doesn't mean that funds are not available and that the city does not stand to benefit from being involved. I suppose the real question here is who owns the waters off the coast of Lakewood?
Shawn
To my knowledge one of the leaders in getting windfarms off the coast of Lakewood is the Farris family. Their plan makes all the sense in the world.
My point is while many things seem green, in fact they are just "good feeling" projects for the community not real "green" efforts.
Rooftop gardens, some recylcing, many efforts are very worthwhile, others are so faux it is bothersome.
I was watching a great special where a girl was getting people at "green concerts" to sign onto a ban to outlaw di-Hydroganted Oxygen. No one refused to sign. It was explained that it came in rain, was filling rivers and lakes, and people could die in it. Of course it was H2O.
I believe that the city only truly recycles a small portion of what is sent in a recylelabels. Reasons being cost, need, and what can be.
While we all want to do the right thing, we should not leave our brains at the door.
This is why I put in sensible.
FWIW
.