New HD Channels on Cox

The jumping off discussion area for the rest of the Deck. All things Lakewood.
Please check out our other sections. As we refile many discussions from the past into
their proper sections please check them out and offer suggestions.

Moderator: Jim O'Bryan

Bryan Schwegler
Posts: 963
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 4:23 pm
Location: Lakewood

New HD Channels on Cox

Post by Bryan Schwegler »

I just noticed that we now have The National Geographic Channel and A&E in HD.

NGC in HD, what a happy day. :)
Stephen Eisel
Posts: 3281
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:36 pm

Re: New HD Channels on Cox

Post by Stephen Eisel »

Bryan Schwegler wrote:I just noticed that we now have The National Geographic Channel and A&E in HD.

NGC in HD, what a happy day. :)
NGC is a highly addictive channel.. Be careful :D
John Walsh
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:51 pm

Post by John Walsh »

Now if we can just get the Big Ten Network.
David Lay
Posts: 948
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 8:06 pm
Location: Washington, DC
Contact:

Post by David Lay »

John Walsh wrote:Now if we can just get the Big Ten Network.
Probably won't happen any time soon, as long as they want $1.10 per viewer from the cable & satellite companies...
New Website/Blog: dlayphoto.com
Stephen Eisel
Posts: 3281
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:36 pm

Post by Stephen Eisel »

I think with Direct TV that we get this for free.
David Lay
Posts: 948
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 8:06 pm
Location: Washington, DC
Contact:

Post by David Lay »

Stephen Eisel wrote:I think with Direct TV that we get this for free.
The problem with Big Ten Network is that they are demanding $1.10 per viewer from the cable/satellite providers for rights to carry the network, which is unheard of, especially for a network which is brand new.

Unless they lower their demands, it's a fat chance that more cable/satellite companies besides DirecTV will carry it.
New Website/Blog: dlayphoto.com
Stephen Eisel
Posts: 3281
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:36 pm

Post by Stephen Eisel »

David Lay wrote:
Stephen Eisel wrote:I think with Direct TV that we get this for free.
The problem with Big Ten Network is that they are demanding $1.10 per viewer from the cable/satellite providers for rights to carry the network, which is unheard of, especially for a network which is brand new.

Unless they lower their demands, it's a fat chance that more cable/satellite companies besides DirecTV will carry it.
that is a rip off... I noticed yesterday that in 600's on Direct TV that were several College Football games on.
David Lay
Posts: 948
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 8:06 pm
Location: Washington, DC
Contact:

Post by David Lay »

Michael Rosenberg calls Big Ten Network a 'greedfest':

http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/arti ... /708300408
New Website/Blog: dlayphoto.com
John Walsh
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:51 pm

Post by John Walsh »

Did you read the entire article? He calls the battle between the Big Ten Network and Comcast a "Greedfest", not the network exclusively. Keep in mind the cable companies can advertise on these networks during the games, so to think that they are protecting their customer is not truly accurate. This is about negotiating a better price and where the network will be placed within the channel tiers.

This is no different than the battle between Sportstime Ohio and the local cable/dish companies a couple years back. When all was said and done, the Tribe was available to all who had cable just as planned. The same will happen here.

If you're a Buckeye fan and you think missing a few lower tier football games is a bad thing, wait til basketball season, 65% of all Big Ten hoops will be on the Big Ten Network.
Post Reply