‘Pull ’em up or pay up’ is new law
Moderator: Jim O'Bryan
-
Stephen Eisel
- Posts: 3281
- Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:36 pm
‘Pull ’em up or pay up’ is new law
This subject has come up a couple of times. This is how one community is dealing with baggy pants.
Baggy Pants (clicky here)
‘Pull ’em up or pay up’ is new law in Mansfield
MANSFIELD  “Pull ‘em up or pay up.â€Â
Anyone caught wearing sagging pants who exposes his or her underwear will be subject to a fine of up to $150 plus court costs, or face up to 15 days in jail.
Baggy Pants (clicky here)
‘Pull ’em up or pay up’ is new law in Mansfield
MANSFIELD  “Pull ‘em up or pay up.â€Â
Anyone caught wearing sagging pants who exposes his or her underwear will be subject to a fine of up to $150 plus court costs, or face up to 15 days in jail.
-
sharon kinsella
- Posts: 1490
- Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 7:54 am
- Contact:
-
Shawn Juris
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2010 5:33 pm
- Jim O'Bryan
- Posts: 14196
- Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 10:12 pm
- Location: Lakewood
- Contact:
now that is funnyShawn Juris wrote:Plumbers beware. There a "crack"down in Mansfield.
.
Jim O'Bryan
Lakewood Resident
"The very act of observing disturbs the system."
Werner Heisenberg
"If anything I've said seems useful to you, I'm glad.
If not, don't worry. Just forget about it."
His Holiness The Dalai Lama
Lakewood Resident
"The very act of observing disturbs the system."
Werner Heisenberg
"If anything I've said seems useful to you, I'm glad.
If not, don't worry. Just forget about it."
His Holiness The Dalai Lama
-
Stephen Eisel
- Posts: 3281
- Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:36 pm
-
Joe Whisman
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 9:06 pm
-
Stan Austin
- Contributor
- Posts: 2465
- Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 12:02 pm
- Contact:
-
Shawn Juris
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2010 5:33 pm
-
Phil Florian
- Posts: 538
- Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 4:24 pm
Don't forget Delcambre...the article cited this town's law as precedence. Be clear, though...they are talking Mansfield, LA, not Mansfield, OH.Shawn Juris wrote:when I think of fashionable, I think of Mansfield. NYC, LA, Milan, London and .... Mansfield.
I am glad that more traditional crime is so under control in Mansfield that officers can spend time staring at teenager's backsides.
-
Joe Ott
- Posts: 216
- Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 8:59 am
- Location: Lakewood
Why? Why is it ridiculous to expect common decency?sharon kinsella wrote:That is the most ridiculous thing I've heard in a long time (and it seems I've heard a lot of ridiculous things lately).
What a waste of time, money and resources, on fashion victims for pete's sake!
What is ridiculous is that laws are required because some people don't have common decency.
New laws aren't required. What ever happened to indecent exposure?
-
Richard Cole
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 1:42 pm
-
Phil Florian
- Posts: 538
- Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 4:24 pm
But since beer guts in NE Ohio are very common, wouldn't this be the very definition of "common decency?"Richard Cole wrote:I read the linked article, and while the intent might be baggy pants, it seems to me it could equally apply to middle-aged beer guts that are often on display on Detroit sidewalks.Joe Ott wrote: New laws aren't required. What ever happened to indecent exposure?
It's a joke. Adults always make a bigger deal out of a short-lived fashion disaster that kids adopt, usually perpetuating it longer than it might have lasted if people either a) ignored or b) laughed at it. I saw a couple teens, one with pants nearly down to knees, crossing the street. I just looked and giggled at him. He hiked them up and kept walking. It looks silly. Treat it as such. Yeesh. A generation from now, if Mansfield LA is still in existence and not swallowed up by the largest exposed underwear faux pas, some law wonk will be going through the various laws and rules and will find this gem and mark it up there with those laws that in some states still endorsed slavery or created a rule that a wife needed to follow the husband by 10 paces.
Seriously, if a single police officer in Lakewood arrested someone for showing a few extra inches of underwear, I will thank the gods that all other crime in the city (you know, acts that actually cause harm to someone or someone's property) has been abolished.
-
Mark Crnolatas
- Posts: 400
- Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 10:32 pm
- Location: Lakewood, Ohio
..
I think that when a guy waddles down the street, because his pants are hanging so low, then he bends over and they come down, which happened in front of Mahalls not long ago, then the guy should be ready to pay for his fashion sense, in front of the people and kids on Madison Ave.
What's a hundred to a cool guy? (no icon for lmao)
Mark Allan Crnolatas
What's a hundred to a cool guy? (no icon for lmao)
Mark Allan Crnolatas
-
Phil Florian
- Posts: 538
- Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 4:24 pm
Re: ..
Mark Crnolatas wrote:I think that when a guy waddles down the street, because his pants are hanging so low, then he bends over and they come down, which happened in front of Mahalls not long ago, then the guy should be ready to pay for his fashion sense, in front of the people and kids on Madison Ave.
What's a hundred to a cool guy? (no icon for lmao)
Mark Allan Crnolatas
See, this is where natural consequences come in. Instead of making it "bad" you make it "funny." Teens typically hate being funny (note: unintentionally funny) but love being bad or at least perceived as bad. The scene you described has been played out dozens if not hundreds of times...in Three Stooges, Little Rascals and on up to whatever modern comedy you want to describe. What would reinforce the idea that this is a bad fashion choice: Attention by police or a bunch of little kids laughing at you. Dress and act like a clown (even accidentally) then get treated like a clown. No need to bring the police into it.
-
Grace O'Malley
- Posts: 680
- Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2005 8:31 pm