Ahead at Lightspeed

The jumping off discussion area for the rest of the Deck. All things Lakewood.
Please check out our other sections. As we refile many discussions from the past into
their proper sections please check them out and offer suggestions.

Moderator: Jim O'Bryan

David Lay
Posts: 948
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 8:06 pm
Location: Washington, DC
Contact:

Post by David Lay »

Joe Ott wrote:computers stink... :)
Unless you're using a Mac.... 8)
New Website/Blog: dlayphoto.com
Rick Uldricks

Post by Rick Uldricks »

David Lay wrote:
Unless you're using a Mac.... 8)
Agreed! Macs rule! There are rumors that AT&T Uverse will play nice with Apple TV: http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atan ... v-in-2008/

The Uverse people stopped by my house yesterday to pitch the new system. Looks like Wyandotte is good-to-go for installation. They are coming back to install on Tuesday.
Teresa Andreani
Posts: 27
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2005 1:18 pm
Location: Lakewood, Ohio
Contact:

Post by Teresa Andreani »

Not available at my address as yet.
J Hrlec
Posts: 480
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2006 7:17 pm

Post by J Hrlec »

Hmmm ... I just switched after many years from At&t (old SBC) to COX. As far as internet speeds, cable still beats it.
Kevin Butler
Posts: 101
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2005 2:56 pm
Contact:

Post by Kevin Butler »

Some posters have made reference to an unseen agreement between Fairview Park and AT&T officials requiring AT&T to install the unsightly VRAD boxes underground there.

Yesterday I spoke with a representative of AT&T, who confirmed this is not the case: Fairview Park will not have underground boxes.

The news doesn't diminish my distaste for the equipment around Lakewood but it should, at least, clear up the misconception that we were left in a worse position than other nearby communities.

Kevin Butler
City Council, Ward 1
Brian Pedaci
Posts: 496
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 1:17 am

Post by Brian Pedaci »

Has anyone had this installed yet?
Stephen Eisel
Posts: 3281
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:36 pm

Post by Stephen Eisel »

I just dumped AT & T and went with Cox Cable for interenet and phone service.. ( I have Direct TV for television) My internet speed is definitley faster with Cox. If some one has this new service from A T & T then please let me know what the upload and down load speeds are... Thanks
Rick Uldricks

Post by Rick Uldricks »

We've had it for over a week and we like it.

We recently purchased an HDTV and getting HD service thru Dish Network would have required a 2nd dish hanging off of our house and Cox was A LOT more expensive.

The installation was interesting -- U-Verse can run off of CAT-5 Ethernet cable or traditional coax cable. CAT-5 is the preferred option. Insist on having them pull new CAT-5 cabling for you rather than using the existing coax.

The picture quality is better than Dish and better than Cox, there's even a way to remotely program my DVR thru a web portal - cool. The Internet speed seems a bit faster, I'm sure it's not as fast as cable though.

Overall, we're happy with it. :D
David Lay
Posts: 948
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 8:06 pm
Location: Washington, DC
Contact:

Post by David Lay »

I'm averaging 11Mbps up/1Mbps down with Cox.
New Website/Blog: dlayphoto.com
Stephen Eisel
Posts: 3281
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:36 pm

Post by Stephen Eisel »

Rick Uldricks wrote:We've had it for over a week and we like it.

We recently purchased an HDTV and getting HD service thru Dish Network would have required a 2nd dish hanging off of our house and Cox was A LOT more expensive.

The installation was interesting -- U-Verse can run off of CAT-5 Ethernet cable or traditional coax cable. CAT-5 is the preferred option. Insist on having them pull new CAT-5 cabling for you rather than using the existing coax.

The picture quality is better than Dish and better than Cox, there's even a way to remotely program my DVR thru a web portal - cool. The Internet speed seems a bit faster, I'm sure it's not as fast as cable though.

Overall, we're happy with it. :D
If only they had the NFL package...
Rick Uldricks

Post by Rick Uldricks »

Looks like U-verse is getting the Big Ten Network.

http://www.bigtennetwork.com/news/index ... eSource=26
Some of the local systems planning to carry Big Ten Network as part of their expanded basic level of service include Altatec Alta Municipal Utility, Cedar Falls Utilities, Celect Communications, Consolidated Communications Network Services, City of Wadsworth Cable TV, Dixon Telephone Company, Grundy Center Municipal, Harlan Municipal Utilities, Hiawatha Broadband, Horizon Telecom, Independence Communications, Iowa Network Services, Mid-Century Communications, Moultrie Telecommunications, Muscatine Power & Water, Oneida Cablevision, Spencer Municipal Utilities, The Community Agency and USA Communications. In addition, Big Ten Network has national distribution agreements with DirectTV and the new AT&T U-verseSM service, as well as a major regional agreement with Buckeye Cable.
User avatar
Jim O'Bryan
Posts: 14196
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 10:12 pm
Location: Lakewood
Contact:

Post by Jim O'Bryan »

New on Detroit AT&T's Lightspeed Cyber-Cafe

Image

Rumor has it service is slower than expected.



.
Jim O'Bryan
Lakewood Resident

"The very act of observing disturbs the system."
Werner Heisenberg

"If anything I've said seems useful to you, I'm glad.
If not, don't worry. Just forget about it."
His Holiness The Dalai Lama
Rick Uldricks

Post by Rick Uldricks »

deleted
David Lay
Posts: 948
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 8:06 pm
Location: Washington, DC
Contact:

Post by David Lay »

Can't you only get one HD stream to the home at a time?
New Website/Blog: dlayphoto.com
Jim DeVito
Posts: 946
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 7:11 am
Location: Lakewood, Ohio

Re: Where is Lightspeed? Cox Cable increase.

Post by Jim DeVito »

Joe Ott wrote:
Jim O'Bryan wrote: We all know Speedvision and F1 is worht it alone. through in the SCCA runoffs and you have a deal and a half..
.
Yeah. I think we just saw the last F1 race at Indy too.
F1 was fun but next year MotoGP is comeing to Indy! That wil be a blast! :D
Post Reply