Again, it is not a tax but a fee.David Lay wrote:Stephen,
I pay rent to my landlord, who in turn pays property taxes on the property that I rent.
If I also had to pay a tax/fee/whatever, wouldn't that be double-dipping?
EDIT: According to the county auditor's website, my landlord paid 12,218.12 in property taxes last year for the building I live in.
Revenue Enhancing Ideas
Moderator: Jim O'Bryan
-
Stephen Eisel
- Posts: 3281
- Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:36 pm
-
David Lay
- Posts: 948
- Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 8:06 pm
- Location: Washington, DC
- Contact:
-
Stephen Eisel
- Posts: 3281
- Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:36 pm
-
Stephen Eisel
- Posts: 3281
- Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:36 pm
-
sharon kinsella
- Posts: 1490
- Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 7:54 am
- Contact:
-
David Lay
- Posts: 948
- Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 8:06 pm
- Location: Washington, DC
- Contact:
So, you're saying that renters should be liable for more taxes/fees/whatever than home owners?
A lot of people, myself included, rent because we can't yet afford to own a home.
A lot of people, myself included, rent because we can't yet afford to own a home.
New Website/Blog: dlayphoto.com
-
Stephen Eisel
- Posts: 3281
- Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:36 pm
-
sharon kinsella
- Posts: 1490
- Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 7:54 am
- Contact:
-
Stephen Eisel
- Posts: 3281
- Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:36 pm
-
Stephen Eisel
- Posts: 3281
- Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:36 pm
No, I am saying that the city should look at charging a residency fee to renters. Note the word fee.. Thanks for paying attention again Dave..David Lay wrote:So, you're saying that renters should be liable for more taxes/fees/whatever than home owners?
A lot of people, myself included, rent because we can't yet afford to own a home.
-
Stephen Eisel
- Posts: 3281
- Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:36 pm
You are not liable for property taxes as a renter. So how are you more liable for taxes then a home owner at $100'S annually?David Lay wrote:So, you're saying that renters should be liable for more taxes/fees/whatever than home owners?
A lot of people, myself included, rent because we can't yet afford to own a home.
-
David Lay
- Posts: 948
- Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 8:06 pm
- Location: Washington, DC
- Contact:
In a city that's known for high property taxes, that's the last thing we need.
New Website/Blog: dlayphoto.com
-
David Lay
- Posts: 948
- Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 8:06 pm
- Location: Washington, DC
- Contact:
Stephen, my rent pays for property taxes...so in effect I am liable, for the length of my lease.Stephen Eisel wrote:You are not liable for property taxes as a renter. So how are you more liable for taxes then a home owner at $100'S annually?David Lay wrote:So, you're saying that renters should be liable for more taxes/fees/whatever than home owners?
A lot of people, myself included, rent because we can't yet afford to own a home.
New Website/Blog: dlayphoto.com
-
Stephen Eisel
- Posts: 3281
- Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:36 pm
-
Richard Cole
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 1:42 pm
Earlier in the thread you said a registration fee than renters would be liable for - now it's a residency feeStephen Eisel wrote:No, I am saying that the city should look at charging a residency fee to renters. Note the word fee.. Thanks for paying attention again Dave..David Lay wrote:So, you're saying that renters should be liable for more taxes/fees/whatever than home owners?
A lot of people, myself included, rent because we can't yet afford to own a home.