***washing hands***Ivor Karabatkovic wrote: Rick,
If that blue Monte' Carlo came down your street bumpin' "Penny Lane" or "Let it Be" would you still call LPD on it every time it rolled by?
you betcha.
Moderator: Jim O'Bryan
Some may view wearing baggy below the crotch beltless pants, at times without the uniform of the day boxer underwear, as just a tad vulgar and rather uncivil behavior.Gary Rice wrote:
First of all, how DARE anyone criticize someone for baggy pants or types of clothing? Or their legal behaviors? That is simply none of your affair. Period.
Secondly, as has been said, there are serious laws regarding discrimination that will get you in very serious trouble if you in some way, discriminate against someone, particularly if they want to rent from you.
Then you are indeed the problem;
Not some child on the street with baggy pants.
You.
Very nice sentiments and all hold an emotional heart string. But also a premise created on the positive side of 'what if'? All people could and should be the salt of the earth. I truly used to believe that. But you are fantasizing in public. Why wait for Avon to send them in? Put up billboards in all the surrounding areas asking for "Give me your tired, your poor,Lynn Farris wrote:You don't know who these people are. Give me a break. These could be people who lost their jobs due to outsourcing and just need a new start. They could be the salt of the earth. They could have gone bankrupt due to medical expenses for a sick child. (By the way the number 1 reason for bankruptcies is medical expenses.) Many of us have needed help from time to time. Some of us are luckier than others and can ask a parent or friend if we need help. For some that friend is a church.
How exactly do you judge character? If it is not behavior and abiding by some social parameters of a civilized environment, then what is it? Sorry, rhetorical question. The assumption here is that they are all church going parishioners in some 1930's movie, starring Spencer Tracy. Nice thought. Too nice.Can we judge people by the quality of their character and not their pocketbook? This is a church that is doing this - and I would assume that these are parishioners, so I doubt that you have people drinking or using drugs or doing other anti-social behavior.
So let me understand this. Another town brings this "opportunity" to Lakewood. You worry that if you don't embrace it, the alternative is to give these people tents to live under bridges downtown? I agree --that is an outrageous position.The church is helping with job search according to the resident. They are helping the people to be self sufficient. Isn't this better than giving people tents to live under the bridge downtown?
LynnLynn Farris wrote:I agree it is interesting that an Avon Church wants to establish homes for their parishoners in Lakewood instead of closer to home. Maybe they are discriminating too and have a NIMBY attitude. I don't know any of these people. They may be salt of the earth or criminals. But doesn't everyone deserve to have a place to live and to have a second chance? Many are critizing these people without having actually met them or learned anything about them other than the church was assisting them. I would have to think of all the millions of people that need help, there has to be some reason the church picked these people to assist. They must of selected them for some positive reason. I pray that I am right and these people prove to be an asset to Lakewood.
The information came from a friend who was approached by the landlord.Dee Martinez wrote:I guess Im still a little unclear about the origin of this thread.
Do we know for a fact that "an Avon Lake church is paying rent for families to live in Lakewood?"